But Apple didn't invent the cylindrical design, this is just the natural progression of PCs. Apple didn't innovate anything I swear!
Apple has copied a lot of stuff also. Did anyone think the company that made the first rectangular case would be the only one to do it?You'll be hard pressed to name one company who hasn't copied Apple yet.
I love it, yay for competition.
The resemblance this case has to the Mac Pro goes beyond its basic geometric shape. The vents on the bottom, the way it curves on the top, and the IO panel on the back are all dead ringers.I don`t get all the whining. After the first rectangular computer case was made there were and are tons of companies making rectangular cases. Where is the whining there?
It looks like apple stole the cylindrical idea from somewhere else anyway. 2005.
http://www.maximumpc.com/fic-piston/
![]()
Id buy this if it fit my GTX 970. But I'd love a case that looked like the classic G5 design, with maybe more ergonomic handles.
It is unfortunate that so much time and effort has been spent to create a good looking PC case that Apple will just shut down. PC cases are universally terrible, and there's really a market there.
One of these days I'll probably bite the bullet and buy a modified G5 case from eBay for my hackintosh.
The resemblance this case has to the Mac Pro goes beyond its basic geometric shape. The vents on the bottom, the way it curves on the top, and the IO panel on the back are all dead ringers.
I won't belittle the engineering skills of this group, as I'm sure they put a lot of time an effort into it. I'm frankly impressed that they managed to make this work with a standard motherboard form factor. But still, it's obviously meant to look like a Mac Pro.
Any symmetrical shape is ‘designed’ to fit inside a cylinder. A cube would have fit just as well and the additional side could house CPU No.2? As it happens they have a single CPU and dual graphics cards, three parts that produce significant heat, hence the three sides.The triangular core was designed to fit inside a cylinder.
![]()
If the Mac Pro didn't have the triangular core... they could have made a cube.
[doublepost=1456002836][/doublepost]
Perhaps because round cases aren't really a good idea?
Not even sure I’d call it real innovation. Our large power modules weigh about 60kg and have a ‘unified' heatsink that carries the IGBTs. On the smaller power supplies we make each transistor has its own heatsink.In a way I agree, but consider this: if you were to make a cylindrical PC case, how much different can you make a cylinder design from a trash can or Mac Pro? Seriously, think about it. In fact people can find trash cans that look almost the same as the mac pro.
The 'real' innovation in the mac pro is the unified heatsink, and Dune isn't doing that, I think people are just overreacting to appearances.
I've done two G5 conversions now, first mATX and 2nd full ATX, using kits from David Chugg @ thelaserhive and I gotta say, I think I genuinely think it is worth it for the following reasons:
1. Re-purposing is even cooler than recycling, it makes me feel good and saves something beautiful from the landfill
2. The cases are attractive, airflow is awesome, and the pop out side door design totally rules. Swap a drive or card in seconds.
3. Apple logo with no risk of lawsuit
4. Tons of room inside, no limitations on any reasonable customization, full size graphics card no problem, liquid cool if you like.
5. Sense of accomplishment from the experience, just-right level of complexity, better pride of ownership
6. Ability to upgrade to your heart's content, no need to buy another case for the indefinite future.
I encourage anyone considering this to go for it regardless of your OS preference. You can get an old G5 case for less than $100 on eBay or Craigslist, they are past 10 years old now and have reached end of life so everyone is dumping them. From there you can spend another $100-$200 for a kit or just hack n slash and do it all yourself if you have more time than money.
Caveat, I seem to spend 3-5 full days on each mod and my wife hates me for it.
Photos, mostly of the ATX build with a few of the mATX at the end.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/phryr461b4ub7k1/AAASBcLx3i-H7resqrn1l7R-a?dl=0
Any symmetrical shape is ‘designed’ to fit inside a cylinder. A cube would have fit just as well and the additional side could house CPU No.2? As it happens they have a single CPU and dual graphics cards, three parts that produce significant heat, hence the three sides.
A Banana Guard is designed, (shaped specifically), to fit a banana. They could just have easily put it into a square box and distributed packing and then said it’s designed to fit a banana.
Great stuff, congrats. Modding can take a lot of time but it's a great hobby, definitely worth it. By the way, I hope you changed that stock intel heatsink, it doesn't seem noisy but under load it can get annoying...
Internally it is very different, yes. But for all the talk of improved airflow, the point of this product is its appearance. Apple doesn't make cases, no. And that fact leaves the market open for things like this.Apple doesn't sell cases and as a whole there is more unlike the mac pro than like it as the internals are/will be completely different and there is far more to the inside of a computer than the outside. I won't be getting one OR a mac pro but people are running on emotion for a billion dollar company over logic.
If apple were selling cases then it would be different. I really will be surprised if apple shuts them down.
In fact tgere is already at least one company selling full computers.
http://m.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=I...m2428.l1313.TR7.TRC2.Ximagic+pi&sqp=imagic+pi
Of all this truly beautiful AND practical industrial design iterations that Apple engineers crafted, invented and brought to perfection, they seriously copy THIS??? The only one I remember, that is NEITHER?
This case iteration was not only hard to look at, but at the same time impractical. It requires about as little desk space as it offers internal peripherals. But "pro" users that attach a lot of external storage sure did not care..
Either way is just as likely. As I said before. They know that they will base everything around three major heat producers. They they ask themselves, ‘Hmm what’s a neat way to package this?’So you think Apple started out making a small computer... settled on the radical triangular core... and THEN decided to wrap a cylinder around it?
That doesn't sound right.
I think Apple wanted to make a cylindrical computer... and the triangular core was the best way distribute the internals.
But hey.... we'll never know.![]()
Thanks for the positive comments guys. One thing I love about the community like macrumor is that its a place where you hear peoples opinions about various topics. There have been some really intelligent people commenting in these forums and I value the comments that have been made regardless if they like the Dune Case or not. The Dune Case is not for everyone and my purpose here in this thread is to help the readers understand that the Dune Case is simply a PC Case not a desktop computer. I had a vision to do something different for the PC and one year later we have the Dune Case. I made a lot of sacrifices away from family to bring something to the community that I think they would like which is not the conventional case made out of sheet metal but rather a case built with quality materials. We are a small startup and I hope we can get as much support for the Dune Case to enable us to continue to make a difference in design and build quality for the PC Case. Thanks everyone here for your contribution so far.
Yes. But there are people who want a very powerful consumer-level machine. Other PC manufacturers cover that really well, and Apple doesn't at all. So we either make Hackintoshes or get old Mac Pros because Apple hates us. I'd say Windows users have it easy... if they weren't stuck using Windows.The Mac Pro is a workstation, not a desktop PC, so it's no surprise it contains a Xeon and ECC RAM. It is overkill for most, but most people shouldn't be considering a Mac Pro.
It's meant to be the same shape as the fan. Doesn't the fan have almost the same radius as the case? I don't know how well a triangular case would have worked; it would have required a much smaller fan or a much larger case.So you think Apple started out making a small computer... settled on the radical triangular core... and THEN decided to wrap a cylinder around it?
That doesn't sound right.
I think Apple wanted to make a cylindrical computer... and the triangular core was the best way distribute the internals.
But hey.... we'll never know.![]()
They've got the exact same vent layout and tapering on the top and bottom. There are definitely ways they could have done it differently.In a way I agree, but consider this: if you were to make a cylindrical PC case, how much different can you make a cylinder design from a trash can or Mac Pro? Seriously, think about it. In fact people can find trash cans that look almost the same as the mac pro.
The 'real' innovation in the mac pro is the unified heatsink, and Dune isn't doing that, I think people are just overreacting to appearances.
Unix is one big reason. Also the non-janky UI and excellent developer tools.Whats so great about OSX.
In a way I agree, but consider this: if you were to make a cylindrical PC case, how much different can you make a cylinder design from a trash can or Mac Pro? Seriously, think about it. In fact people can find trash cans that look almost the same as the mac pro.
The 'real' innovation in the mac pro is the unified heatsink, and Dune isn't doing that, I think people are just overreacting to appearances.
Unix? It's horrible and sluggish. Back when it was fitst released and still is today. On any hardware.Unix is one big reason.
I don`t get all the whining. After the first rectangular computer case was made there were and are tons of companies making rectangular cases. Where is the whining there?
It looks like apple stole the cylindrical idea from somewhere else anyway. 2005.
http://www.maximumpc.com/fic-piston/
![]()
Apple didn`t make tbe first rectangular phone, the first rectangular tablet. How about rectangle shaped monitors? Who made the first? The apple watch, rectangle, they copied rectangle watches. The apple watch is different than other rectangular watches? This case will hold a different computer than the mac pro. Same argument. Seriously I don't get the whining, would it be better if only one company made one shape of each thing? Christ.
[doublepost=1456034581][/doublepost]Apple has copied a lot of stuff also. Did anyone think the company that made the first rectangular case would be the only one to do it?
Is anyone getting upset about apple copying to make the pen for the ipad pro? The internals of this cylindrical case are different as are the pen so it IS the same thing. People getting upset over external shape.
Just happened to read this earlier.
http://www.applegazette.com/feature/6-things-apple-did-not-invent/
The real innovation in the Mac Pro is $$$$$$ apple has the funds to create customs Components that fit into it, for instance good luck getting 2xfull GPUs in a PC version.
Soooo....given the PC components you can buy these days, a cylinder case is kinda a waste of time due to the design/space restrictions. If your want a mini factor , get a cube. Cannot see any company making components that will fit cylinder cases anytime soon. A shuttle PC cube can take 2xgpu.