dxomark.com crowns ip6 gold standard of cameras

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by Raffi, Sep 27, 2014.

  1. Raffi macrumors 6502a

    Raffi

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2013
  2. macmacguy macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2014
    #2
    Very close results, so no big difference regarding cameras.
     
  3. Raffi thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Raffi

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2013
    #3
    They do say that the 6 shows luminance noise visible in low light conditions but other than that no much difference at all. Shows that camera is a big difference if your not buying an iPhone but not enough to justify the jump up to a larger phone.
     
  4. macmacguy macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2014
    #4
    It depends from person to person. Anyway, the camera is just one of the features of the phone, it depends how much influence it have on your choice.
     
  5. Appl3FTW macrumors 601

    Appl3FTW

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    #5
    The iphone 6+ is super crisp and color contrast is amazing. It trumps my contrast in rMini hands down.
     
  6. Raffi, Sep 27, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 27, 2014

    Raffi thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Raffi

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2013
    #6
    Color contrast is almost perfect according to the test and my eyeballs.
     
  7. Appl3FTW macrumors 601

    Appl3FTW

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    #7
    U sir have an awesome eyeballs
     
  8. hulk2012 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
  9. Raffi thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Raffi

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2013
    #9
    I meant perfect :)
     
  10. Appl3FTW macrumors 601

    Appl3FTW

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    #10
    Eyeballs too pointy
     
  11. nooaah macrumors 68000

    nooaah

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2009
    Location:
    Philadelphia, PA
    #11
    I LOLed
     
  12. deviant macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    #12
    And they still make some photos extremely blurry :D it's the software, right?
     
  13. CoilTap macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    #13
    Proving once again that higher megapixel counts are for chumps.
     
  14. Raffi thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Raffi

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2013
    #14
    All this chasing higher spec war is nonsense. Look what it did to PC's. Apple need to stick to its business model and we need to support them, or else we end up with android garbage.

    ----------

    I had no idea perforce was a word.
     
  15. Appl3FTW macrumors 601

    Appl3FTW

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    #15
    I would prefer the smooth efficient ecosystem of apple vs. spec greedy crapsung fandroids that's irritatingly annoying.

    Lulz strong aware @ perforce
     
  16. iPhone7ate9 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2014
    #16
  17. Raffi thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Raffi

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2013
    #17
    Proof? Any thorough test done with every smartphone camera and point and shoot in existence will do. Anything else is throw up coming out of someone's mouth.
     
  18. deviant macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    #18
    Countless photos on this forum? Macro shots are awesome. Scenery shots are meh
     
  19. iPhone7ate9 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2014
    #19
    It's pretty bad..
     
  20. Appl3FTW macrumors 601

    Appl3FTW

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    #20
    See it's awesome
     

    Attached Files:

  21. Raffi thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Raffi

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2013
    #21
    So thats the scientific test? Like the guy bending the iPhone huh? Or this guy going on tv saying a phone in his pocket bent? I understand that some people like internet rumors and nonsense but dxomark are accurate, a lot more than people on macrumors.
     

    Attached Files:

  22. Raffi thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Raffi

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2013
    #22
    proof? Here is a picture that I took. Notice that the fence is in focus, the net is in focus, the boy is in focus, and the background is in focus. Go take that same pic with another smartphone camera then come back and show us.
     

    Attached Files:

  23. deviant macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    #23
    I don't need scientific tests to see that my 4s pics are sharper than 6 photos. I'm only talking about sceneries. And it's probably just software applying too much noise reduction. If you can't see it you're blind, no scientific(or medical) tests needed.
     
  24. Raffi, Sep 27, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 27, 2014

    Raffi thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Raffi

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2013
    #24
    That is nothing more than some person in a forum saying that he thinks the 4s takes better pictures. There is no subtance to it. No one knows if its opinion, trolling, deliberate lies, or real. Does that make sense? If you go through the site you notice two things. One is that there is no advertising , which means they aren't catering to anyone and second they have pictures taken and show why they are better. You basically said that you don't like it.
     
  25. deviant macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    #25
    Nope. Cause that person ordered two pluses and is kinda expecting a raise in quality over his old 4s. Does that make sense?

    Look at this picture and try telling me it doesn't seem that it's painted. Try me. And there are COUNTLESS examples like that. Although SOME photos look awesome, can't lie. But there is some post processing problem in certain conditions.
     

Share This Page