Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
dxomark.com crowns ip6 gold standard of cameras
- Thread starter C. Robert
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Yeah the detail quality in that pic is pretty bad. Lots of smearing.
Most people don't want EVERYthing to be in focus btw.
----------
Well I have a 6 right here myself. All these people aren't trolling.
It's good when it's small. If you look full size it seems watercolor painting
----------
Photos are nice, it's the details that are kinda meh. Macros are awesome though. Lots of photos of bugs in that thread, spectacular.
It's good when it's small. If you look full size it seems watercolor painting
----------
Photos are nice, it's the details that are kinda meh. Macros are awesome though. Lots of photos of bugs in that thread, spectacular.
I agree the colors have been nice it's just that when you look closer everything looks like it has 300% noise reduction.
Processing problems is another word for user error.
----------
Most people don't want everything to be in focus? seriously. I have a 6 plus and two 5s' and it is very evident, that the 6 takes better pics, but that doesn't matter at all. What matters is that SCIENTIFIC tests that were done and it came out to be better. What I say is nothing more than an opinion and what you say is nothing more than an opinion.
Hahaha you're so full of ****** man.
People don't care about tests. People trust their eyes, not benchmarks
people with 6es are telling you there's something wrong, you're just to blind to see thatAww someone is defensive. The iPhone is what's processing the pics. If it laid off the noise reduction it would be an awesome camera.
And yes, having everything in focus is terrible unless you are a landscape photographer.
Nothing I've said is opinion, the details are blurred and smeared.
Im not defensive. You aren't giving any substance to the discussion. Its like someone saying a dyne meter isn't as accurate as their own feeling driving a car. Everything you said is opinion. Unless you get in a lab with multiple iPhones to negate differences, test them with every variable against her devices, then everything you say means nothing. I haven't seen anything blurred or smeared so there it is. My pinion against yours which doesn't matter. Maybe, next you'll go around telling people weight scales are wrong.
Well, yeah, the feeling you get when driving a car is more important than a lab test.
I showed You a photo that's all blurred . You claim to have never seen it. Thanks for confirming for us that you're indeed blind. And a blind fanboy for that matter, too.
Labs say cars consume * per gallon. It's always more in real life. Yay, labs!!!!
"Always more in real life" is that a fact?
So your more accurate than a lab? Give me a break. After any opinion you give say in my opinion. This test was done to show how cameras perform and tested with real machines. Maybe instead of seeing an ey doctor. I should just ask you if I need glasses? I bet your internal dental X-ray powers are also top notch.
----------
Not feeling but horsepower claims.
Back to your batting cage photo though, surely you see all the smearing going around the details? And everything being in focus is NOT a quality one would want in a camera.
Yeah, good luck with that attitude
" dude, I just saw a movie it was the best ever in terms of cgi " - " no it wasn't, where is the proof? Where are the lab test?" ! You must be fun in real life )----------
Sshhhh! His photos are perfect, labs said that! Also, his kid is the most handsome at school and has the longest "shtick" !! and I dare you to say otherwise
Yeah, good luck with that attitude
----------
Sshhhh! His photos are perfect, labs said that! Also, his kid is the most handsome at school and has the longest "shtick" !! and I dare you to say otherwise
I thought you would break under pressure of real world facts and honest debate. The cause I said so argument says a lot about someone.
Well sometimes it's nice to talk to people like normal people would, not have to act like we're all scientists in a lab.
The batting cage pic is something you usually only see on a DSLR. The human eye can't even replicate that. If the camera is too advanced for the photographer then that's a personal issue.
The only real world lab test you oughtta take is some eyes test. I get it, you got a new toy and you think it's the best ever and it probably is, but there are problems with it. Will they sort them out? Probably yeah. But you defend them like you've invested your whole life in that company. It's just silly
"Show me examples" "here" "huh? The guy that took that is probably an idiot, he's holding it wrong!!! Labs said its awesome!!!"The only real world lab test you oughtta take is some eyes test. I get it, you got a new toy and you think it's the best ever and it probably is, but there are problems with it. Will they sort them out? Probably yeah. But you defend them like you've invested your whole life in that company. It's just silly
Im not arguing what I think because its an opinion and I stated that. I am saying that dxomark the standard for camera testing said it tested better than any other phone. Your arguing that your eyeball is the camera test standard. That is something that I brush because its an opinion. I think some phone cases are ugly but thats my opinion. If someone goes out and conducts a survey of cases then thats more accurate than my eyeballs. If that doesn't make sense to you then there is no reason arguing.
----------
Go to a batting cage or something similar and try to focus everything in view. Then come back and tell us you were able to do it.
One case can be a lot better than the other, but If the case YOU Like is prettier you don't care what labs say. Your EYES decide if it's prettier or not. Those photos are not prettier than the others. I can't believe I have to explain it here. What is this, kindergarten????
You don't WANT everything in view to be in focus, that's the point of a DSLR.
Sorry I'm being mean I don't think the iPhone 6 is that bad of a camera I'm just very picky. I think if people really want good pictures they should get a real camera.
We are not talking about focus. We are talking about how photos are blurry and smudged, in a cage or not. Is it THAT Hard to understand ?
I haven't seen blurry or smudged. Im looking at pictures taken with my 6 and my 5 and the 6 takes better pics. More accurate and with less noise but like I said its my opinion. Your opinion is yours and it doesn't matter to anyone but you. People give opinions all day but you need to understand that most of the time they don't matter. Putting something on a scale is a lot more accurate than saying oh! thats heavy because to someone else it might be light. I like accuracy and facts you like people who agree with you.
----------
Look at this rebuttal to dxomark. The first you should notice is that the site is heavily advertised on. The second thing is that its an opinion piece.
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2012/04/dxomatter.html