Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Problem with Safari!

After the upgrade I can no longer watch videos on ABC.com TV shows when I use Safari. Firefox works fine with the TV shows but on Safari only ad shows or preview videos works okay. But when I click on featured shows the loading animation will show up, but just the loading animation the show won't start at all. So far that's the only major problem I have since updating to Snow Leopard the rest are just minors. Anybody else has the same problem?
 
This "freely use computing hardware the way they want" notion lives and dies in small corners of the internet, and in the even smaller corners in which Apple fan sites live, fuelled mainly by the geek/tech-enthusiast minority that (wrongly) thinks it knows whats best for everyone else. In fact, Apple seems to know best. Period

I see, us Linux users don't know what's best for everyone but Apple and their users do.



:confused:
 
I see, us Linux users don't know what's best for everyone but Apple and their users do.



:confused:

Judging by the state of Linux today, judging by the direction in which the entire industry is moving (where Apple leads), absolutely.

Apple has tapped in to the technological sweet spot of our time, and they're capitalizing on it. The day everyone tries to be more "Linux-like" (probably the first and last time you'll ever read that phrase), the rights of the argument might shift.
 
Not all of us are like that. I have 10.4 (albeit a PPC copy) through 10.6 retail discs in my closet. Not running 10.6 fulltime, but I've paid for my copy and in a few months time will use it.

I agree. I always have bought the retail copies. Even though now I have three hackintoshes (can use torrented stuff) and one powerbook (cannot install SL), I am still going to order SL very soon. And then I will install SL on all Hac Pros
 
Indeed.

SL is just the right upgrade for the right price. Frankly, I was ready to pay $129 for it. A lot of us were.

Why? I haven't read anything positive about Snow Leopard yet - what would make you want to pay $129 for strictly under the hood improvements (which based off what I've been reading aren't necessarily improvements)?
 
Some do it because it is there!

HUH! Hogwash! :p. Most of the hackintoshers are already breaking EULA's and are proud of it and have the audacity to have an excuse for doing it as if the excuse justifies it so if you think for one minute they are even willing to pay $30 when they can just torrent it you are giving them too much credit.

I was one that purchased 4 9500/9600 Mac Clones. They worked great with Apple's OS up to OS X. They were only licensed to go to about 8.1, whatever was the last release before HFS+. We were not treated as outlaws when we used the new versions of the Mac OS.

Now people running Hacintoshes are labeled as criminals. When I get time to build one I will like many will purchase our own copy to go with our Mac OS running computer. Just as there is a group of Windows computers that like to assemble their computer from the parts they want, the same hods true in the Mac group. Apple is really only spending money & effort on those companies that openly sell the Mac OS installed on the non Mac hardware. They knew that when they went to a computer that was really generic, like a Windows's PC that they would have to give up total hardware control. If they didn't then their head is farther in the sand than I would imagine.

Make your own Hacintosh, you may like it better thanyou thought you would.

My old name that came during the Mac II, IIx IIfx time frame was Dr Frankentosh. This was earned when I built my Mac IIfx from parts. It never had a case or speakers.
 
SL was cheap because there's nothing to see.... Unfortunately, as Apple gets more popular, its quality keeps falling. I've collected a serious of inexcusable bugs so far, including problems with mail rendering, inability to use some photo hosting sites, and also the primary purpose of my iMac, which is iPhoto. My machine no longer recognizes my cameras, even after the .1 release. This is a mess, and I may have to backgrade to a known good release (even 10.5.7 introduced sev1 bugs like my bluetooth no longer working (with Apple hardware) and that's the only input devices I have)
 
I haven't read anything positive about Snow Leopard yet

:confused:

Have you been reading at all?

http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2009/08/mac-os-x-10-6.ars


SL was cheap because there's nothing to see.... Unfortunately, as Apple gets more popular, its quality keeps falling. I've collected a serious of inexcusable bugs so far, including problems with mail rendering, inability to use some photo hosting sites, and also the primary purpose of my iMac, which is iPhoto. My machine no longer recognizes my cameras, even after the .1 release. This is a mess, and I may have to backgrade to a known good release (even 10.5.7 introduced sev1 bugs like my bluetooth no longer working (with Apple hardware) and that's the only input devices I have)

Are you sure your problems aren't just your own that you're projecting on to everyone else? That seems like a hobby around here.
 
Had I wanted to deal with the rest of your post, I would have quoted the rest.

And you can call Apple's record successes - in a recession, excuses.

I call it facts.

Are you so blind you can't read or do just not bother? Or both? I never mentioned nor brought up anything general about their sales. I was strictly talking about the usefulness in price comparisons.

Again, let me spell it out for you. My comment was about the point of discussing the price of Windows in regards to OS X and vice versa. They're both parts of different business strategies so comparing them price to price is pointless.

Thus over to the next part in my post, for a price vs price comparison to be useful we would need for both OS's to be available under the same type of distribution strategy.

Now if, and only if, Apple would have the balls they would make it available. The tragic result, unfortunately, of Apple taking Microsoft head on would probably leave them smeared all over the wall so let's just hope they don't. Competition is the best for all of us end-users.

If you need a more elaborate explanation than that, find a friend to do it for you. Though I don't think you're even trying and that's the really sad part. There's really little point in having any discussion with someone as heavily biased as you. It just doesn't bring anything to the table. Heck, even Laguna has his moments but he at least he reads the posts from start to end.

If you would like to admit that you missed my point and missinterpreted the whole thing, feel free. It would only make you greater.
 
Are you sure your problems aren't just your own that you're projecting on to everyone else? That seems like a hobby around here.

There's plenty of evidence that a lot of people are having problems with 10.6 - so your "nothing's wrong" attitude is just as misplaced as the post that you are criticizing.
 
:confused:

Have you been reading at all?

http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2009/08/mac-os-x-10-6.ars




Are you sure your problems aren't just your own that you're projecting on to everyone else? That seems like a hobby around here.

what a clueless fanboi. I bet I've had macs longer than you have. I do software project management for a living and know what quality is and isn't. You want to recreate my issues? I can give you the details.. I repeat. This is a mess quality wise, and Apple has acknowledged most of the bugs I've reported to them.
 
Totally pleased now

After getting my internet wireless connectivity problems solved, I am thoroughly pleased with 10.6. It seems to boot up twice as fast as it did. The improvements are refinements. I notice when I use Checkup, both processors now seem to be doing an equal amount of work. In 10.5 processor 1 did 80% of the work. Even Sierra Watcher the driver for the USB 881 air card is nice and stable, no reinstalling the device every third or fourth launch. Apple better have some good tricks up it sleeve for 10.7.
:D
 
100% on CPU 1 and 0% on CPU 2 is good....

I notice when I use Checkup, both processors now seem to be doing an equal amount of work. In 10.5 processor 1 did 80% of the work.

In general, it's a bad thing to see both CPUs at 50% vs seeing one CPU at 100%.

There's significant overhead and costs with dealing with cache and other state if you "ping-pong" a thread between CPUs.

On the other hand, if before it was 80% on one CPU and with 10.6 it's 80% on both CPUs - then you're getting twice the work
done!
 
Are you so blind you can't read or do just not bother? Or both? I never mentioned nor brought up anything general about their sales. I was strictly talking about the usefulness in price comparisons.

Again, let me spell it out for you. My comment was about the point of discussing the price of Windows in regards to OS X and vice versa. They're both parts of different business strategies so comparing them price to price is pointless.

Thus over to the next part in my post, for a price vs price comparison to be useful we would need for both OS's to be available under the same type of distribution strategy.

Now if, and only if, Apple would have the balls they would make it available. The tragic result, unfortunately, of Apple taking Microsoft head on would probably leave them smeared all over the wall so let's just hope they don't. Competition is the best for all of us end-users.

If you need a more elaborate explanation than that, find a friend to do it for you. Though I don't think you're even trying and that's the really sad part. There's really little point in having any discussion with someone as heavily biased as you. It just doesn't bring anything to the table. Heck, even Laguna has his moments but he at least he reads the posts from start to end.

If you would like to admit that you missed my point and missinterpreted the whole thing, feel free. It would only make you greater.

So having balls to do something in this case would be to act stupidly anyway. You're implying that Apple having the guts to do something would only result in failure. So why imply that at all? Even if Apple *did* have the balls, they still wouldn't do it because they aren't stupid.

There's nothing wrong with the spirit of your post. Just your logic. Or lack thereof.

And yes, I most certainly am heavily biased toward Apple. Why wouldn't I be? MS does an excellent job ensuring that, year after year as well as the rest of this sleepy industry.

I'm probably a "fanboi" because most of what MS has done for the past decade, and are doing now, really doesn't merit any significant level of excitement.

You'll forgive me if I have little to no faith in a company that has been in a near-comatose state when compared to a rival half its size and half its resources.

When it comes to the consumer sphere, MS hasn't known WTF it's doing for years. Sorry for not being super-pumped about their latest me-too attempt - the Zune HD, for example, a device that is yet again, trying to ape what Apple has already chewed up and spit out. How the hell am I supposed to react after years of MS mediocrity when we have a company like Apple churning out winning products on a regular basis?


what a clueless fanboi. I bet I've had macs longer than you have. I do software project management for a living and know what quality is and isn't.

No problem. Tell me how long and I'll arbitrarily beat it by at least three years. The internets are fun like that.

In cyberspace, we're all experts. With years of experience, managers and designers all.

As if any of that actually means anything. No one really cares. And I'm the Easter Bunny, and know what quality is and isn't.

So let's see your list of problems so the rest of us can reproduce them.
 
So let's see your list of problems so the rest of us can reproduce them.

Seriously, *LTD*, you should start many of your posts with </tact> - since they're totally lacking in it.

Lighten up a bit, and accept that both "half full" and "half empty" are valid viewpoints. Apple's not perfect, Apple's not complete crap, Microsoft's not perfect, Microsoft's not complete crap.
 
Kudos!!

I think the main reason for the sales spike is the lack of incompatibility with apps and other devices. Apple=awesome!
 
We ordered the same number of copies that we sold in the first two weeks of Leopard's launch and we sold out in an hour and a half.

It's selling very bloody well.
 
Early Snow Leopard Sales More Than Double Those of Leopard

This just in: $130 (leopard) is more than double $30 (snow leopard).

the_more_you_know2.jpg
 
Early Snow Leopard Sales More Than Double Those of Leopard

This just in: $130 (leopard) is more than double $30 (snow leopard).

the_more_you_know2.jpg

While that's funny, I think they mean unit sale, not dollar volume.

But I like the "More You Know" graphic :).
 
At this price, anything would sell like hot cakes... even Vista.

I wonder, how much interest the new OS would generate if it was the regular 129 USD. Personally, as I recently got rid of my 1st generation unibody MacBook and got a slower MacBook Pro with a better screen and Firewire, I can update for free (or some P&P). So far, I haven't.

If it was my choice, I would still have Tiger. My first Apple portable had Tiger on it and it was great. With Leopard came endless upgrades, patches, bugs and features that I don't use. Eventually, I will upgrade, but it will not happen before 10.6.2, I think. I became very cautious about Apple's efforts recently.

Some Apple nazis and fanboys might feel differently, but I have more regret that I missed out on the free Windows 7 release candidate offer. I wouldn't use it as a primary OS, but I know that that is the OS that has real relevance. 10 % is still a relatively small minority. There is more need for a good MS OS than a polished version of Leopard. That will be the OS that MS Office will be based on, that most game designers will base their products upon; and that will be the OS that the overwhelming majority of people will use most of the time.

And whoever says that "At the current rate, Apple could immediately cease OS development for a decade and still be ahead of Microsoft in the operating systems "race."", is an infatuated moron.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.