My bias is clear.... That's a new one. I own more Windows based products than I do Apple products. Hmm, where do my loyalties lie, to my family and my country that's it.
You shouldn't jump to conclusions. You can even go back to my postings dealing with the <insert whomever> vs Apple vs <insert whomever> lawsuits, I always state that if Apple owes money to the patent holder they should pay.
So yeah, my loyalties again, what were you getting at again?
Now, back on topic:
The DA is pursuing charges based on what a specific anti-crime program, i.e. this type of case is their sole reason for existence, decided a crime had been committed and they should investigate the matter further. Our taxes are paying them either way, they might was well work.
Gee, they kicked in the door because the had... gasp a search warrant. The Search warrant, which by the way was signed by a judge, gave them a reason to enter the location listed on the warrant. They kicked in the door because no one was home to open the door.
Next time the police have a search warrant for your home, stand outside and tell them you won't unlock the door - they'll still kick it in or you can unlock it and save on the door repairs.
Apple's legal team may be "involved" but only to advise on Trade Secret violation issues. Gray would have been the original complainant, so they would confer with Gray first.
So I ask you why are you sticking up for people that broke the law?
What if I came by your house, noticed your car was in the street and decided you "abandoned" it since it's not in your garage or your driveway? Would you be ok if I took it, called the manufacturer asking if they want it back and then selling it when they say it's not theirs? Would you not be upset and expect the police to apprehend the person whom "found" your car?
I know the above is a stretch, just trying to prove a point.
