I have excellent memory, so it’s not a problem for me anyway.I have unique, extremely strong passwords for dozens of sites and accounts, important ones that I try to change frequently. Unlike my avatar, I don’t have an eidetic memory nor do I have the time I would need to devote to keeping them in my memory. Especially since technology has already provided an adequate solution.
You can’t recover files off the internal SSD with T2 even if you haven’t enabled encryption?I understand Apple's point of view for restoring backups, especially since they have removed the user's ability to recover files from failing hard drives with the T2 chip. If they encrypt iCloud too then a SSD failure and a forgotten password means you lose everything.
In the meantime, can't you just store anything you want encrypted in an encrypted folder?
This sounds like a very reliable method indeed, but it wouldn't work for my since most systems enforce very specific password standards, e.g. must be precisely ten characters long, has to contain at least on number and one special character, must not contain any words from the blacklist (that you can't check yourself, but obviously most names are on it), must not contain more than two similar characters in succession, must not contain more than three characters in the same succession as in your last password, must be different from the last six passwords...Buy tomorrow's newspaper take a page with lots of text and frame it. Select an article and let's say pick sentence 15. That's your password. The "painting" on the wall won't lett you forget the password. All you have to do is remember the sentence number. Worked for me for years.
You can find a fitting sentence with number and symbols. I haven’t seen a website that requires a specific length of password in a very long time. I see a minimum of 8 with extra symbols usually.This sounds like a very reliable method indeed, but it wouldn't work for my since most systems enforce very specific password standards, e.g. must be precisely ten characters long, has to contain at least on number and one special character, must not contain any words from the blacklist (that you can't check yourself, but obviously most names are on it), must not contain more than two similar characters in succession, must not contain more than three characters in the same succession as in your last password, must be different from the last six passwords...
Therefore writing them down it is.![]()
I definitely agree with them.
How does this work from a tech perspective? The data would be just one giant blob and not searchable or indexable in any way, right? If I wanted to restore anything, I'd have to restore everything?
We should be very careful what we ask for. While I value privacy, there are legitimate reasons for someone else to have the key to our files. For example, should something happen to your spouse or parent (stroke, severe accident, etc), all their info would permanently be locked out, including all their photos. We live in an age where the photos of all our loved ones reside on our iPhones and iCloud. There must be a way to salvage them.
How does this work from a tech perspective? The data would be just one giant blob and not searchable or indexable in any way, right? If I wanted to restore anything, I'd have to restore everything?
How do you restore an iCloud backup if you forgot your password? You can’t! This article is full of baloney!
In today's world, there is no excuse not to have the password securely written / printed out and safely put away.How do you restore an iCloud backup if you forgot your password? You can’t! This article is full of baloney!
Glad to see the EFF publicly pushing for this. Apple needs to take heed.
I want safety. I promise not to complain if I go senile and forget by password.
You won't complain but there will be masses blaming Apple from not being to get their precious pictures back that they failed to backup to a secondary means. I see it on forums now people that actually opted into 2FA get upset when they have to use Account Recovery because they no longer have a trusted phone number, then they complain how long the verification process is. Failing to read the document that says it's automated and calling Apple won't change the time. I think if people want further encryption and concerned on legally who has access to their iCloud information, just don't use it. Use iTunes, and turn on backup encryption and let the legal system send a subpoena for your whole computer and network records.
The biggest problem is too many people are lazy. They don't use password managers, they use the same password on multiple sites, they create accounts and link them to social media, and last but not least, they expect someone else (like Apple) to protect them from themselves. Too many people are stuck on stupid.You won't complain but there will be masses blaming Apple from not being to get their precious pictures back that they failed to backup to a secondary means. I see it on forums now people that actually opted into 2FA get upset when they have to use Account Recovery because they no longer have a trusted phone number, then they complain how long the verification process is. Failing to read the document that says it's automated and calling Apple won't change the time. I think if people want further encryption and concerned on legally who has access to their iCloud information, just don't use it. Use iTunes, and turn on backup encryption and let the legal system send a subpoena for your whole computer and network records.
What benefit is there to Apple if they have to yet still act as a gatekeeper for an irresponsible person? If you're going to demand encryption higher than what anyone currently wants in iCloud, then that party to bear the responsibility of complete handling IMHO. If people make demands, I would give them want they want with full disclosure, "if you lose this key, you lose your data, don't file a court order because in our terms and conditions which you skipped reading, we warned you"Couldn´t there be 2 options, one option where it is like today where Apple also has access to a key, and the other option where only the end user has the key. That way people could choose which one they want.
You are in control of what apps can use iCloud for, the setting is in your phone. And if a company isn't disclosing that it's housing it's data on iCloud in it's Terms & Conditions, that's a 3rd party company issue.You can’t avoid the issue like you suggest; it’s not just about backups. Lots of apps store information on iCloud directly.
Yes, you can prevent iCloud access in apps, but often that means the apps won’t function fully, and you won’t be able to automatically sync data between devices, etc. So my iPad can’t see the information i just saved on my iPhone when i turn off iCloud for that app.What benefit is there to Apple if they have to yet still act as a gatekeeper for an irresponsible person? If you're going to demand encryption higher than what anyone currently wants in iCloud, then that party to bear the responsibility of complete handling IMHO. If people make demands, I would give them want they want with full disclosure, "if you lose this key, you lose your data, don't file a court order because in our terms and conditions which you skipped reading, we warned you"
[doublepost=1551401884][/doublepost]
You are in control of what apps can use iCloud for, the setting is in your phone. And if a company isn't disclosing that it's housing it's data on iCloud in it's Terms & Conditions, that's a 3rd party company issue.
I turned off any app from directly storing in my iCloud except Apple apps with a flick of the wrist, at least for the companies that show on Settings > Name > iCloud, under my Apps that use iCloud list.
Bottom line is, if we're going to use something and want to take additional security, it's our responsibility to maintain that security. iCloud isn't forced on any one, it's one service you can opt into.
For a company to choose to do that, that means they are also adding on additional cost, people already complain that 5GB isn't enough. Just imagine the cost absorption for that level of coding and encryption to be implemented, the cost gets passed on to someone to turn a profit.Yes, you can prevent iCloud access in apps, but often that means the apps won’t function fully, and you won’t be able to automatically sync data between devices, etc. So my iPad can’t see the information i just saved on my iPhone when i turn off iCloud for that app.
Why not just offer a switch to encrypt iCloud, complete with all the necessary warnings and confirmations, and leave it up to the users?
Who cares? They do this on macOS already with time machine backups. You can choose to encrypt them or not.You are too much relying on "common knowledge" or responsibility the usual user is capable, "charging" on his/her own shoulders....
Too many of them are not really knowing, what they are doing.
And one day you go senile and forget your password, and your promise not to go senile and forget your password.I want safety. I promise not to complain if I go senile and forget by password.
Everything on your iPhone is encrypted. And still it's searchable and indexable and everything. Without the right key it's just a giant glob and not good for anything. With the right key it's all there.How does this work from a tech perspective? The data would be just one giant blob and not searchable or indexable in any way, right? If I wanted to restore anything, I'd have to restore everything?
If people complain that 5GB free storage is not enough, they can get 50GB for less than a dollar a month. And the cost of coding and encryption? Whatever it costs (and it's not _that_ much) is divided by hundreds of millions of customers.For a company to choose to do that, that means they are also adding on additional cost, people already complain that 5GB isn't enough. Just imagine the cost absorption for that level of coding and encryption to be implemented, the cost gets passed on to someone to turn a profit.
And if on a Samsung phone they can restore all their data (with everyone else and his dog also able to restore their data), what is their next phone going to be? Apple doesn't want to be right, they want to sell.What benefit is there to Apple if they have to yet still act as a gatekeeper for an irresponsible person? If you're going to demand encryption higher than what anyone currently wants in iCloud, then that party to bear the responsibility of complete handling IMHO. If people make demands, I would give them want they want with full disclosure, "if you lose this key, you lose your data, don't file a court order because in our terms and conditions which you skipped reading, we warned you"
Apple can provide iCloud information that includes name, address, email, mail logs with date/time stamps, photos, Safari browsing history, iMessages, and more, with full details outlined by Apple on its privacy site.