I do want to point out that there was once a company called Apple that received a 500,000 government backed investment (if someone knows the details, please correct me).
Yeah, we're going to need a source for that.
I do want to point out that there was once a company called Apple that received a 500,000 government backed investment (if someone knows the details, please correct me).
http://www.sbia.org/?page=sbic_program_historyYeah, we're going to need a source for that.
With all respect, this is not personal, but please understand that you are parroting the UN/Agenda 21 bullshaite that is designed to have you psychologically take responsibility for the consequences of a very very small global elite's crusade to rape the planet for their own psychotic motives.We can't continue polluting like we are, and not giving a damn about what our chemicals are doing to the world.
That's your opinionIf you actually know who he is, that honestly makes things look worse.
With all respect, this is not personal, but please understand that you are parroting the UN/Agenda 21 bullshaite that is designed to have you psychologically take responsibility for the consequences of a very very small global elite's crusade to rape the planet for their own psychotic motives.
I think he made an uncharacteristically harsh statement. My impression was that he was expressing his lack of concern over losing some talent to Apple. Now he is trying to moderate that. Sometimes I say stuff that is not exactly what I mean.Is this the going trend these days ? Make a nasty statement and then backtrack the very next day ?
Sorkin..Musk... I wonder who is next in Line![]()
I think he made an uncharacteristically harsh statement. My impression was that he was expressing his lack of concern over losing some talent to Apple. Now he is trying to moderate that. Sometimes I say stuff that is not exactly what I mean.
Agenda 21? Agenda 21? Really?
Has MacRumors been taken over my WingNutDaily? People that can't hold a coherent thought subscribe to the wild eyed paranoid fantasies of that, and the other genre publications... (Rense.com?)
Where did the money come from to save GM? It wasn't free. There's opportunity cost to it. Who's to say that a private company wouldn't have bought GM and tried to fix what was wrong with it. Hey, isn't that what happened to Chrysler??
I'm to say that. There was no money for anything - it was a liquidity crisis. No one had enough cash to cover their debt and the banks seized up. That means people couldn't borrow to buy cars. And companies couldn't borrow to buy GM.
Where did the money come from? Well the gov't issued more cash, so the money came from a small devaluation of the dollar, which is better than total economic collapse and a worthless dollar... So, ya, all things considered I'm pretty good with all this government intervention. Frankly, we'ed be better off with more - they should have prosecuted the criminal bankers.
Can you explain which subsidies Tesla is receiving in comparison to other manufacturers?
The $7500 rebate doesn't go to Tesla. It goes to the car buyer. The ZEV credits come from other car manufacturers. Every car manufacturer is eligible for both of these.My point isn't that he's receiving subsidies that others aren't. My point is none of his products have turned a profit and the only thing keeping his company afloat (and him rich) are our tax dollars.
Let's take a look at your logic. Since the bailouts of GM and the banks, the government (really the Fed) has printed $4T in 7 years. Because now there is a moral hazard to saving the entire stock market.
You have seen some devaluation in the dollar but the inflation has been primarily in housing, commodities, and stocks. Who owns these assets? The 1% do. Because they got the new money first.
What happens to the 99%? They have to deal with higher rents because of real estate going higher. They have to do deal with higher food prices because commodities go higher and their purchasing power goes down because they can't beat inflation because they don't own stocks.
After seven years of this policy, we now have greater inequality than we did before. That is the result of this misguided policy.
And after all is said and done, people complain about the the rich getting richer not realizing it was their support of these bailouts that are the true cause in the first place.
Early macs weren't hits either, they were expensive, reliable machines purchased by what millennials might call "hipsters."
View attachment 591660
This is what his picture says to me.