I can only imagine how much an Apple iCar will cost.
Last edited:
Considering the increased competition of electric cars from various manufacturers, Tesla might end up not having the lions share of the marketplace for electric vehicles.big blunder by Tim Cook. oof.
For real?I am for one glad that that acquisition never went through. I love Apple, but healthy competition never hurt anyone.
And tesla is absolutely whipping every other vehicle manufacture at the moment, when it comes to experience, which is what apples always been about.
It’s finally exciting to see someone beating apple at their own game for once
Nope. Smart move by Tim. Cash burning Tesla who’s only profit is related to selling electric vehicle credits to other auto companies which will go away. Stock price is irrational exuberance and does not correctly value Tesla fundamentals.
Really? How many Apple Cars are there on the road right now? Must have missed them.Are you for real with this comment? Tesla isn't beating Apple at doing ANYTHING. Apple is at an Alpha stage right now with their car project. Sounds like you just want to see Apple fall down flat on their butts because your comment makes no sense. You mentioned competition. If anything it's TESLA that needs the competition from Apple since they have a current product that needs a competitor. SMH.
...and they would have 100x the quality they have now.Thank goodness Apple didn't buy Tesla. Otherwise, Tesla cars will cost twice as much.
competition has been coming since 2013 https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303653004579210053345661982Considering the increased competition of electric cars from various manufacturers, Tesla might end up not having the lions share of the marketplace for electric vehicles.
I hope you realize your post is contradicting of itself? You're doing nothing but agreeing with what I posted. 🙄Really? How many Apple Cars are there on the road right now? Must have missed them.
Tim Cook is great at supply chain logistics (not this year), but also not that great when it comes to thinking outside the box
Does Apple need to do a blockbuster acquisition to find success? Beats and P.A. Semi seem to be bigger finds for the company than grabbing a company at its height.Tim Cook's hesitancy to make large acquisitions and instead focus on mainly organic growth is admirable. However, in hindsight, the analyst calls for Apple to purchase Netflix and Tesla many years ago seem like they would have been a good idea.
Indeed there is something very weird about how finance pubs are covering an Apple car. The pieces don't add up.Where is Apple going to build a vehicle? They going to buy a factory, and where? They going to subcontract this to Foxconn, and where would that be built? Unlike the Buick midsize SUV, built in China but no one really knows that, this vehicle will have a country of origin everyone knows about, and unlike my iPhone, people will care.
There is no infrastructure for this thing. They will create battery designs, auto drive systems, and that will be licensed to firms which are still burgeoning on electric vehicles.
You are underestimating China.funny how you immediately go straight to focusing on the stock price.
the electric vehicle credits will go away when the other auto companies go bankrupt because they can't figure out how to build an EV in time. even if they do, then there's the charging infrastructure. EVEN if they figure both of those out, they don't know how to sell a car without having a huge traditional marketing budget which Tesla spends $0 on, so how are they going to beat Tesla on price given the feature set? and if they somehow figure out all of those 3, then Tesla's full self driving software will be running live which will take car companies another 4-5 years to figure out. they can't even get over the air updates working so customers have to bring in their car to the local dealership to update the firmware. hilarious.
It's a blunder because if you could go back in time, knowing what we know now, Tim would surely do things differently.And how is this a blunder? Apple is far wealthier than Tesla. Just because Telsa reaches out Apple to purchase the company doesn't mean Apple has to do it. Apple doesn't need Tesla to build cars.
If you believe two major things:big blunder by Tim Cook. oof.
I’d love to see the look on his face when Apple releases this groundbreaking tech.Musk in a separate tweet said that the Apple Car rumors are "strange if true" and that a monocell design is "electrochemically impossible."
We don't need another Beats fiasco.Tim Cook's hesitancy to make large acquisitions and instead focus on mainly organic growth is admirable. However, in hindsight, the analyst calls for Apple to purchase Netflix and Tesla many years ago seem like they would have been a good idea.
Apple has done just fine without making these purchases, but has been unable to grow revenue the past 4-5 years until the pandemic spurred growth. It would be interesting to know how a Netflix and Tesla purchase years ago would have changed Apple's course.
Disclaimer: Apple and Tesla are some of the largest portions of my portfolio.
No, Apple doesn't NEED Tesla. But the point of buying an established company in an industry that you want to enter is to get into the market faster. You pay a premium to move more quickly. Let's say the rumor is true and Apple starts making a small amount of cars in 2024, it will take them many years to ramp up production to get to a meaningful amount (to move the needle on Apple's overall revenue.) Maybe as long as 2030.And how is this a blunder? Apple is far wealthier than Tesla. Just because Telsa reaches out Apple to purchase the company doesn't mean Apple has to do it. Apple doesn't need Tesla to build cars.