Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Drilling and solar are failures, and soon the car company will come down to Earth as no one will attain > 10% share of EVs. He wasted tens of billions all because of his Ego.
I'm just mentioning he is more than just a car company CEO. Never been on twitter, never will be. Don't care what he does with his money
 
If that chart is correct then it shows that Musk is a shrewd business man. A business that had/has potential but is poorly managed and thus drops out of popularity charts whereby it's value drops. A long comes a shrewd business man who thinks he can make the business good again buys it on the cheap. Wait till it's value drops and buy it on the cheap, it's how things are done in the business world.
I would ask where this has ever worked in the world of social media. This is more like Murdoch's purchase of MySpace, once these start going the way of the dinosaur there's no salvaging them. I think Elon treats it like his own billionaires playground, the premise of no rules will result in a haven for right wing fanatics in their own echo chamber but will further lose its appeal to the mainstream.
 
That’s fair. I rate you partially correct. It’s a matter of eroding precedents.

In 2013, Harry Reid and the Democrats lowered the vote threshold on nominees but not on Supreme Court justices. In 2017, Mitch McConnell extended it to Supreme Court nominees. Both sides are responsible.
Of course Reid ended the fillibuster on federal judges below the Supreme Court because McConnell was holding up all judicial nominees in violation of norms. "Both sides" may have played a part. But McConnell was clearly the primary cause. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: millerj123
Just a reminder that less content moderation ≠ more free speech.

It just means that the speech of the vulnerable, the harassed, and the targets of hate speech will be silenced, or at least chilled

Elon has a long hill to climb to prove that he now cares about the fair, but perhaps not favorable, views of everyone, particularly as they relate to him and his companies personally.
Very well said and I am in complete agreement with you.

Anyway, to my mind, this is an unwelcome and unfortunate development, and, apart from generating profit, I cannot see any positive outcome for Twitter (or for many - such as women, minorities, the vulnerable, people who are harassed and who are targets of hate speech - who currently use the platform).
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Also, you seem to be saying that half the employees at Qualcomm (50/50) and half of all Physicians (at least from 1991 to 2012 where 57% of male physicians donated to Republican candidates -- although declining to about 50% by 2012 -- according to a JAMA study) are unintelligent Christo-fascists who just do not care about people. Seems like an absurd claim but believe what you will.
A survey of well-educated GOP supporters from 2012 says nothing about their views of the the Republican Party in 2022. Obviously. Trump happened in-between.
 
Of course Reid ended the fillibuster on federal judges below the Supreme Court because McConnell was holding up all judicial nominees in violation of norms. "Both sides" may have played a part. But McConnell was clearly the primary cause. :)
That’s fair. 😊 Both sides play hardball.
 
Yes, let the lies and miss-information fly, let's let Trump take over the country and turn us into an Authoritarian government already. Sick of people having a say.
There is some breathtaking ignorance out there.

The translation of this post is— “if the people democratically vote Trump in, he’ll turn us into an Authoritarian gov’t.”

Well, it’s the people’s choice.

Plus— a true dictator has complete control of the gov’t. Trump never had that because so many in the bureaucracy and in Congress were against him.

The true danger is a totalitarian state where gov’t and industry collude to suppress free speech, which is what has been happening with the Democrats and Big Tech since 2020 and which Musk’s purchase of Twitter will hopefully address.
 
People wondering how Twitter will be under Elon.

Look at his companies. Innovative, successful, well meaning to society. He has an excellent track record.
Now look at his companies more closely. Abusive, ingrained with racism, late to deliver on promises almost without exception, propped up by unwavering support from weird nerds who choose to ignore the obvious reg flags.

I'm sure Twitter will be fine, but let's not pretend there aren't any issues with the businesses Musk involves himself in.
 
And the solution to this is not moderation or censorship. The solution is more free speech.
1. Maybe in a ideal world where propaganda can be marginalized. But on the internet, propaganda drives engagement.
2. Moderation is important part to free speech. The wheat needs to be separated from the chaff. Otherwise much of the value is lost.
 
Everyone seems to be arguing over a network that's essentially on its way out

Twitter is not the only "social" site hemorrhaging users lately. Many are seeing a decline due to the erratic behavoir of owners and management.

It appears that Musk has a personal agenda here with his throw away money and wants his own personal political playground. Those choosing to stay can be his pawns on a dying network but it's hard to see how it can be salvaged at this point. Look at AOL, MySpace and the trend FB is going, none of them have ever come back.

Great insight, when people can't handle opposing viewpoints or follow rules they may buy their own personal political playground and the few people that are on it are their pawns.

We'll have to wait and see how the Elon era goes, it will be interesting. I have high hopes that he will be able to clean up that mess.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: webbuzz
Been on for 13 years, and it’s now time to go. Sad day.

Like someone else said, lack of moderation doesn’t mean free speech, it means a hell scape of harassment. Will be encouraging everyone I know to move to Mastodon, but more than likely will just end up leaving non-Instagram social media altogether.

And with that... we have a muted thread. Go off, Elon nerds lol.

Edit: Still getting notifications for this for some reason. Keep it comin', weird nerds.

View attachment 1996602
"hell scape of harassment"
What do you call the last few years where the woke mob whipped into a frenzy by fake news & false narratives has attacked anyone who isn't goose stepping with them? You think the place where blue checkmarks circle jerk via virtue signalling was some Shangri-la of social media?
 
It’s not the airport, no need to announce your departure.
Been on for 13 years, and it’s now time to go. Sad day.

Like someone else said, lack of moderation doesn’t mean free speech, it means a hell scape of harassment. Will be encouraging everyone I know to move to Mastodon, but more than likely will just end up leaving non-Instagram social media altogether.
Mastodon who?
 
There is some breathtaking ignorance out there.

The translation of this post is— “if the people democratically vote Trump in, he’ll turn us into an Authoritarian gov’t.”

Well, it’s the people’s choice.

Plus— a true dictator has complete control of the gov’t. Trump never had that because so many in the bureaucracy and in Congress were against him.
Seems like you mistranslated there. The post that you responded to didn't say anything about returning him to office democratically. :)

It's not the people's choice when districts are gerrymandered to insure a political advantage within states and the House of Representatives. It's not the people's choice when in a 50-50 Senate the Democrats represent 40% more voters than the Republicans. It's not the people's choice when a Senate that lopsided has full control over appointments to the Supreme Court. It's not the people's choice when the Supreme Court doesn't represent the people. It's not the people's choice when Republicans have controlled the presidency for 12 of the last 30 years despite only winning the popular vote once. It's not the people's choice when the people are deliberately misinformed.

The true danger is a totalitarian state where gov’t and industry collude to suppress free speech, which is what has been happening with the Democrats and Big Tech since 2020 and which Musk’s purchase of Twitter will hopefully address.
Or like Desantis actually and plainly violating the first amendment in Florida.
 
1. Maybe in a ideal world where propaganda can be marginalized. But on the internet, propaganda drives engagement.
2. Moderation is important part to free speech. The wheat needs to be separated from the chaff. Otherwise much of the value is lost.

And who decides what is good speech vs. bad speech? Who does the "separating"? Sorry, but this concept of free speech is over 250 years old, and it has only been in recent memory that we've begun to emphasize "feelings" over objective truth.

In this new digital world, social media is in fact the new town square. We have allowed private companies to impose their own biases on the ability of people to communicate their ideas online. I am glad to see that with Twitter at least, that will stop. And the writing is on the wall for the other social media guys.

If you want to have your discourse in a moderated forum, well, here we are.
 
Literally what makes you think a car company CEO can save a social media company other than the fact that he’s rich?

I’ll never understand the blind loyalty to Elon Musk.
you're a robot.jpg
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.