Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is what $1 billion in cash looks like. Now multiply it by 44.
dgJJmnf9eRE7VfPX7rHg_OUFCSps9A8JA79-9Ny7yLU.jpg
That really is a lot to fathom thats how much he had to contribute for this purchase. He seriously must have a lot of back-end plans that nobody’s aware of to spend that type of cash flow on an entity that I don’t believe is worth ~ 44 billion.
 
Hmm, what exactly are all the Tesla cars I see on the road then? What up with all those rockets I see that deliver astronauts to the ISS then land the booster back on terra firma for reuse? I'm pretty sure there are real tunnels being dug in Vegas as well.

While FSD isn't ready for prime time, yet, it is really foolish to label his collective accomplishments as "vapourware".

What have you done today to better the world?
LOL. Search out “Thundef00t”, on YouTube. Pay attention to the data and calculations, not the person.
Then come back and tell me I’m wrong.
 
When the government uses their platform to censor people, that's no longer the issue ... and it's no longer just "their" platform. And that IS The issue. This has gone far beyond just being a social media platform. It's become a weapon (Facebook included) of the government to attack free speech not only in this country, but around the world. It's dangerous, unconstitutional, and you should be worried. They call it "misinformation" while constantly contradicting themselves weeks or months later, which means they were the ones spewing misinformation. But only the ones backing their agenda are immune to being canceled by this "misinformation" ... or even worse ... the "scientific consensus" ... which is not a thing as we have seen the "science" change about 1,000 times in the last two years, which is the fastest I've ever seen scientific things change since I've been alive.

If you haven't noticed the glaring problem with what's going on with big tech lately, and you don't have a problem with it, you are seriously lost.



That's another issue entirely, but that is definitely a big one. In California, apparently telling people they are thieves for stealing is racist, so they passed that law where anything stolen valued at under 1,000 dollars can't be prosecuted. So of course shops all over California are leaving and they don't understand why. It's probably because they don't want to be robbed blind until they no longer have any products to steal. And Kamala Harris herself literally bailing criminals out of prison only for them to turn around a day later and commit the same crimes. The level of corruption going on is beyond anything I ever imagined would be possible.
I’m not sure where this turned into a discussion about the government censoring their platform.
I replied specifically to the OP for a reason. If you look back you’ll see.
 
I’m not sure where this turned into a discussion about the government censoring their platform.
I replied specifically to the OP for a reason. If you look back you’ll see.
The response was relevant to the comment. I was expanding on the fact that they are no longer just a social media platform. They have worldwide influence and are now being used as a tool of the government to censor people. The government wasn't something you talked about, but it is pertinent to what's going on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Elon Musk money screamed!

I can't believe a single person can buy a massive social media platform like that. Hopefully Twitter doesn't end up like Facebook.
I hope I’m wrong, but I can almost guarantee it will.. if 1. It hasn’t already… 2.… wait that’s all I got 🤷🏽‍♂️
 
Last edited:
In my opinion it was the very high profile court case of Musk being sued for defamation over a tweet he made which has formed maybe part of his reasoning for buying twitter because the court case brought free speech into question, basically it being was he allowed to insult someone by calling them 'pedo guy' and surprise suprise, a US jury found him not guilty.



The man who brought the case forward, this is a statement from his lawyer
Mr Unsworth's lawyer Lin Wood said their side would leave the court "with our heads held high" but that the decision was "not a good verdict for society".
"This verdict sends a signal, and one signal only - that you can make any accusation you want to, as vile as it may be and as untrue as it may be, and somebody can get away with it," he said.

and I agree with the lawyer because it will open the floodgates on people using free speech to be vile and insulting towards others and get away with it. This is going to be Musk's version of Twitter, open season on everyone and the argument of 'free speech' will be used as it's justification.
 
That really is a lot to fathom thats how much he had to contribute for this purchase. He seriously must have a lot of back-end plans that nobody’s aware of to spend that type of cash flow on an entity that I don’t believe is worth ~ 44 billion.
He just wanted more followers 😉

I read online: That Elon says it's about the very importance for there to be an inclusive arena for free speech.
Twitter has become kind of the de facto town square, so it’s just really important that people have both the reality and the perception that they are able to speak freely within the bounds of the law.
 
Last edited:
Literally what makes you think a car company CEO can save a social media company other than the fact that he’s rich?
What makes you think an electronic payments CEO (PayPal) could launch a successful automobile company? Or spaceship company? Oh wait…
 
  • Love
Reactions: Boyyai
In my opinion it was the very high profile court case of Musk being sued for defamation over a tweet he made which has formed maybe part of his reasoning for buying twitter because the court case brought free speech into question, basically it being was he allowed to insult someone by calling them 'pedo guy' and surprise suprise, a US jury found him not guilty.



The man who brought the case forward, this is a statement from his lawyer


and I agree with the lawyer because it will open the floodgates on people using free speech to be vile and insulting towards others and get away with it. This is going to be Musk's version of Twitter, open season on everyone and the argument of 'free speech' will be used as it's justification.

First mistake was probably having Lin Wood as his attorney.
 
First mistake was probably having Lin Wood as his
In my opinion it was the very high profile court case of Musk being sued for defamation over a tweet he made which has formed maybe part of his reasoning for buying twitter because the court case brought free speech into question, basically it being was he allowed to insult someone by calling them 'pedo guy' and surprise suprise, a US jury found him not guilty.



The man who brought the case forward, this is a statement from his lawyer


and I agree with the lawyer because it will open the floodgates on people using free speech to be vile and insulting towards others and get away with it. This is going to be Musk's version of Twitter, open season on everyone and the argument of 'free speech' will be used as it's justification.
so nothing will change then
 
I happily have never had a Twitter account, or any social media ever.

I think people/consumers tend to forget that social media is optional, but once they become engulfed, they don’t know how to get out of it. That’s not a life I’d want to live.

I agree completely. No twitter, no instragram. I have a Facebook account with no friends, completely set to private so I could use my Oculus Quest 2. Social media is an addiction, the fact that a multi billionaire has bought the company has people shaking worried about their fix. Maybe not the best analogy but I do think people are far to hooked on social media platforms and would have serious trouble leaving them completely, not just jumping to a different one.

You have complete control with social media. Someone harassing you? You can block, mute and report and then never hear from them again. I do feel sorry for those who get so shook up online, I can't imagine being so overwhelmed by something strangers say online.
 
Nothing has happened to Twitter yet but people are still very triggered. The idea that "people I disagree with" will be allowed to speak without censorship and warning labels is appalling to some. Other forums, present company excluded, should take note that people don't like one sided heavy handed censorship.
 
Social media companies should not be dominated by the whim of one person. We've had that already with news agencies and that experiment did not turn out well for democracy.

"Had" that already? We still have that. It continues today. What does this post even mean? Someone creates a social media company and that's okay but one person buys it and it's not okay? Makes no sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boyyai
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.