Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So much for that lie being spread about Elon allowing anything to go on there. Violate the TOS, and you're still gone as it should be. Proving yet again the advertisers paused their campaigns for no reason other than pressure from activist groups.

But...but...but... FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!!! :rolleyes:

BL.
 
Half the people want hate speech online? Says who?

Anonymity is the reason why such speech is so pervasive online.

There are little repercussions online. Perhaps they need to start connecting names to accounts?

The idea that hate speech is something that can and should be enforced is not shared by as many people as you think. The enforce hate speech laws or rules, you need to designate someone to decide what gets censored and what doesn't, and the people who end up doing that in a society are the people you would least want to. And who are they to decide what the rest of us can think and say?

There is no way to do this without an eventual slide towards tyranny.

If you're OK with the power to censor people based on your political views, you should also be OK with other people having the power to censor you based on their political views. Fair's fair.

We all know what happens when a racist is outed.

Not sure what the point of all this bluster is.
 
This would have been an interesting meeting to sit in on.
The idea that hate speech is something that can and should be enforced is not shared by as many people as you think. The enforce hate speech laws or rules, you need to designate someone to decide what gets censored and what doesn't, and the people who end up doing that in a society are the people you would least want to. And who are they to decide what the rest of us can think and say?

There is no way to do this without an eventual slide towards tyranny.

If you're OK with the power to censor people based on your political views, you should also be OK with other people having the power to censor you based on their political views. Fair's fair.



Not sure what the point of all this bluster is.
You’re still ignoring that there are rules on Twitter, apple, workplaces, schools, etc for hate speech.

Remind me again are they tyrannical ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
You’re still ignoring that there are rules on Twitter, apple, workplaces, schools, etc for hate speech.

Remind me again are they tyrannical ?

Nah, you can't just refuse to engage with my argument while asking me to keep engaging with yours.

To enforce hate speech laws or rules, you need to designate someone to decide what gets censored and what doesn't, and the people who end up doing that in a society are the people you would least want to. And who are they to decide what the rest of us can think and say?
 
I wonder what leverage Elon has over Tim
🤔
I’m sure Twitter is a treasure trove of information. Anybody know how many shares of Apple stock Elon owns? Maybe one day we will all find out how they resolved this “misunderstanding”.
 
Well, these threads are always good for at least one thing - finding a couple more accounts to slap with an "ignore." It's a shame, since I don't want to only hear one side.

But when people are having a normal conversation about the topic at hand (Musk visiting Cook at the Apple campus) and the next thing you know the thread has been hijacked by screeds that include "woke" and "children having genital surgery" and "left-wing-racists" and on and on and on, ignore it is. I'm sure they'll get to Hunter Biden's laptop soon enough (if they haven't already - I stopped reading).

Most normal people I know don't derail conversations like this. They just live their lives and talk about what's being discussed. Like adults.
 
Well, these threads are always good for at least one thing - finding a couple more accounts to slap with an "ignore." It's a shame, since I don't want to only hear one side.

But when people are having a normal conversation about the topic at hand (Musk visiting Cook at the Apple campus) and the next thing you know the thread has been hijacked by screeds that include "woke" and "children having genital surgery" and "left-wing-racists" and on and on and on, ignore it is. I'm sure they'll get to Hunter Biden's laptop soon enough (if they haven't already - I stopped reading).

Most normal people I know don't derail conversations like this. They just live their lives and talk about what's being discussed. Like adults.
I mean...you are in the political section of macrumors. Why are you here?
 
The idea that hate speech is something that can and should be enforced is not shared by as many people as you think. The enforce hate speech laws or rules, you need to designate someone to decide what gets censored and what doesn't, and the people who end up doing that in a society are the people you would least want to. And who are they to decide what the rest of us can think and say?

There is no way to do this without an eventual slide towards tyranny.

If you're OK with the power to censor people based on your political views, you should also be OK with other people having the power to censor you based on their political views. Fair's fair.



Not sure what the point of all this bluster is.
We participate on platforms where we agree to potentially be censored all the time. This very forum for instance. As long as my governmentally protected right to free speech isn’t being infringed, there’s no issue.
 
We participate on platforms where we agree to potentially be censored all the time. This very forum for instance. As long as my governmentally protected right to free speech isn’t being infringed, there’s no issue.

I'm glad it's that simple for you. For the rest of us though, a platform as big and relevant as Twitter is a kind of town square, quite different from a forum for Apple enthusiasts. Being censored for political views on Twitter where a) basically everyone is, and b) there was a good faith expectation that the rules were politically neutral, is different.

Just because a company can write something into its terms of service and act according to those rules, doesn't mean the rules themselves are beyond scrutiny. Although this position of "well it's within their rights to do so" is often used when one wants to avoid the morality debate.

Censoring mean words on the internet might mean less mean words, temporarily at least. But you can't ignore the technical issue, which is that if you determine that "hate speech" is grounds for censorship, you need people to be deciding what hate speech is and who gets censored for it and when. Are you good enough to decide for the rest of us what we get to think and say? I'm not, and I don't think you are either.
 
I'm glad it's that simple for you. For the rest of us though, a platform as big and relevant as Twitter is a kind of town square, quite different from a forum for Apple enthusiasts. Being censored for political views on Twitter where a) basically everyone is, and b) there was a good faith expectation that the rules were politically neutral, is different.

Just because a company can write something into its terms of service and act according to those rules, doesn't mean the rules themselves are beyond scrutiny. Although this position of "well it's within their rights to do so" is often used when one wants to avoid the morality debate.

Censoring mean words on the internet might mean less mean words, temporarily at least. But you can't ignore the technical issue, which is that if you determine that "hate speech" is grounds for censorship, you need people to be deciding what hate speech is and who gets censored for it and when. Are you good enough to decide for the rest of us what we get to think and say? I'm not, and I don't think you are either.
The platform owner is good enough to decide. If you don’t like it, use a different platform. It really is that simple. If Musk wants to ban West for posting swastikas, that’s his prerogative. Why should popularity of a platform get to dictate whether or not the platform owner has to use their freedom of speech and freedom of association to assist someone else in making their own speech. What an absurd notion. If there is a critical mass of free speech absolutists, then their chosen platform will be a roaring success. I mean 4chan exists, but of course we see how popular that platform is. Probably because normal people don’t want that kind of garbage in their face every day.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mainsail
Why is MacRumors not talking about the limitation of airplay in China? I really want to know. Am I missing it somewhere? This has to be one of the biggest stories that is currently impacting Apple right now and this site can’t bring itself to post about it? Perhaps MacRumors should consider just deleting the political topic if they have interest to protect by talking about certain things?
Has MacRumors posted anything about Apple limiting the use of AirDrop in China? i tipped them off a couple of days ago and so far nothing. Why?

MR posted an article they based off 9to5Mac way back on Nov 9.
What specifically did you tip them off about a few days ago?


 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.