Space Karen always looking out for his incel troll fanbase. Big win for them.
So your theory is that Musk likes blocking people and therefore will REMOVE blocking from Twitter?Of course Elon wants this, because he has blocked dozens of people for saying bad things about Tesla, or SpaceX or Twitter (sorry X).
The best way to solve this is to delete Twitter from your life, makes for a great relaxing life.
No. The whole sentence reads “apps with … social networking services must include the ability to block abusive users from the service.”I read this as Twitter has to have tools for blocking abusive users, not that those tools need to be given to other users. So quite possible Twitter can remove blocking as long as it has a way to remove bad actors.
💯Just gets dumber...and dumber...and dumber. What a crock.
Can I get in on this? I want to waste my day arguing about the relative merits of some billionaire instead of using my day for anything productive or useful too.So your theory is that Musk likes blocking people and therefore will REMOVE blocking from Twitter?
I mean, seriously, WTF?
There are people every bit as insane on the left side of the fence as on the right side; they just suffer from Musk Derangement Syndrome rather than from subscribing to QAnon. But the incoherence, the lack of rationality, the conspiracy theories - zero difference between the two.
How long until he removes that feature? Twitter is a dumpster fire.
sure it is. i don't see the troll's contents i'm muting in my notifications. quite literally remotely close.Not even remotely close to accomplishing the same thing.
The free speech absolutist has no problem with dead naming, so let’s keep doing it to his business.Twitter no longer exists. I have seen some news sites referring to as X (fka Twitter) which seems to be the best approach.
The first highlighted text is quite literally what he means. "Blocking abusive users from the service" is speaking to X corp, not X users. Users have no control of who is allowed on "the service".That is not the way this clause is intended or will be interpreted.
It specifically states that it applies to user-generated content. All companies have the ability to control what is available on their back end. They wouldn't be able to program without it. This has everything to do with the user and not the company.
I see a lot of rage but I don’t understand the issue.
Once you mute someone they are gone from your Twitter. They don’t exist to you. So if someone is annoying you or harassing you - mute and they disappear. Boom. Done.
Why is it important to have block which just stops someone from seeing your tweets. The important thing is that people don’t get harassed, right?
sure it is. i don't see the troll's contents i'm muting in my notifications. quite literally remotely close.
Musk is drunk on power. He exercises it willy-nilly, ‘because-he-can.’Block will be reintroduced as a paid feature
I bet his friends and accolades will always have the block feature.
It’s funny isn’t it. Journalists are like crack addicts for this thing. Some have staked their whole careers on it. I didn’t realise this until recently.I’ve thought this a few times this year, but it’s become increasingly apparent that heavy twitter posters are so hopelessly hooked that they’ll keep coming back no matter what he does. In particular this includes most journalists and news figures, who will continue to give it free publicity in their articles and coverage thus upholding the idea of it being ‘important’.
You forgot the /sLove Elon! He’s the man!
Not sure if this is sarcastic or serious 🧐i thank Heaven Elon is an absolutist when it comes to free speech.
i shudder to think what he'd have done if he were a fascist
Did you read the article?mute. very simple.