Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Of course Elon wants this, because he has blocked dozens of people for saying bad things about Tesla, or SpaceX or Twitter (sorry X).

The best way to solve this is to delete Twitter from your life, makes for a great relaxing life.
So your theory is that Musk likes blocking people and therefore will REMOVE blocking from Twitter?
I mean, seriously, WTF?

There are people every bit as insane on the left side of the fence as on the right side; they just suffer from Musk Derangement Syndrome rather than from subscribing to QAnon. But the incoherence, the lack of rationality, the conspiracy theories - zero difference between the two.
 
I read this as Twitter has to have tools for blocking abusive users, not that those tools need to be given to other users. So quite possible Twitter can remove blocking as long as it has a way to remove bad actors.
No. The whole sentence reads “apps with … social networking services must include the ability to block abusive users from the service.”
 
I see a lot of rage but I don’t understand the issue.

Once you mute someone they are gone from your Twitter. They don’t exist to you. So if someone is annoying you or harassing you - mute and they disappear. Boom. Done.

Why is it important to have block which just stops someone from seeing your tweets. The important thing is that people don’t get harassed, right?
 
So your theory is that Musk likes blocking people and therefore will REMOVE blocking from Twitter?
I mean, seriously, WTF?

There are people every bit as insane on the left side of the fence as on the right side; they just suffer from Musk Derangement Syndrome rather than from subscribing to QAnon. But the incoherence, the lack of rationality, the conspiracy theories - zero difference between the two.
Can I get in on this? I want to waste my day arguing about the relative merits of some billionaire instead of using my day for anything productive or useful too.
 
I found myself blocking all the advertisers on my feed, so it wouldn't surprise me if this is another way of making sure ad revenue can be sold as no one will be able to block adverts anymore. If that is the case, I wonder how many other people have been blocking adverts en mass for this to happen...
 
Yeah right, like he won't be able to block. Blocking for me, but not for thee. I think Mark will handle this in the Octagon:

you-try-to-block-me-mark-zuckerberg.gif
 

Attachments

  • you-try-to-block-me-mark-zuckerberg.gif
    you-try-to-block-me-mark-zuckerberg.gif
    3.8 MB · Views: 52
That is not the way this clause is intended or will be interpreted.

It specifically states that it applies to user-generated content. All companies have the ability to control what is available on their back end. They wouldn't be able to program without it. This has everything to do with the user and not the company.
The first highlighted text is quite literally what he means. "Blocking abusive users from the service" is speaking to X corp, not X users. Users have no control of who is allowed on "the service".

And no, a 100% decentralized, peer to peer social network would have zero control on who is allowed to connect to other users. Now I'm not sure how other decentralized apps are allowed on iOS like Damus but that would be seemingly in violation unless it's not 100% decentralized.

However second highlighted text could absolutely mean user blocking content but mute achieves the same purpose of not seeing unwanted content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schnort
I see a lot of rage but I don’t understand the issue.

Once you mute someone they are gone from your Twitter. They don’t exist to you. So if someone is annoying you or harassing you - mute and they disappear. Boom. Done.

Why is it important to have block which just stops someone from seeing your tweets. The important thing is that people don’t get harassed, right?

sure it is. i don't see the troll's contents i'm muting in my notifications. quite literally remotely close.

Have you considered that harassment can extend beyond the platform and information from your account can be used maliciously outside of twitter? It's not just about them disappearing to YOU. Sometimes, for your own safety, you need to disappear from THEM.
 
Block will be reintroduced as a paid feature o_O

I bet his friends and accolades will always have the block feature.
Musk is drunk on power. He exercises it willy-nilly, ‘because-he-can.’

the other organizing principle of Musk's stewardship of Twitter is to make it difficult for mainstream, righteous Americans to congregate on the site / app. every decision appears to be pro-trolls and anti-citizen

i thank Heaven Elon is an absolutist when it comes to free speech.
i shudder to think what he'd have done if he were a fascist
 
I’ve thought this a few times this year, but it’s become increasingly apparent that heavy twitter posters are so hopelessly hooked that they’ll keep coming back no matter what he does. In particular this includes most journalists and news figures, who will continue to give it free publicity in their articles and coverage thus upholding the idea of it being ‘important’.
It’s funny isn’t it. Journalists are like crack addicts for this thing. Some have staked their whole careers on it. I didn’t realise this until recently.

And the incredible thing is twitter only has about 250m users. Compared to other networks its reach is nothing. But because the media use it almost exclusively they amplify its importance to the wider world.

I’ve started to see why it’s a bit of an uphill struggle for even Threads to compete with it. Simply because the media create what’s “relevant” even if it isn’t even true.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.