Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,559
30,890


Twitter or "X" CEO Elon Musk today said that he plans to speak with Apple CEO Tim Cook about lower App Store fees for creators who earn money through subscriptions on the Twitter/X social network.

X-twitter-logo.jpg

In a post on creator support, Musk said that he plans to ask Apple to collect 30 percent of the creator fee that Twitter keeps rather than 30 percent of the total fee that a creator on Twitter earns. That would potentially give Apple a much lower cut of the money that Twitter is paying out to creators.

Musk said that Twitter does not plan to collect any fees from creators who earn under $100,000. After the $100k mark, Twitter will collect 10 percent of a creator's earnings, though the first 12 months will be free for all creators. If Apple agreed, Apple would be entitled to 30 percent of the 10 percent cut that Twitter takes from creators earning more than $100k.

Apple collects in-app purchase fees from subscription purchases that are made through the Twitter app on iOS devices. Apple earns 30 percent for the first year of a subscription, and 15 percent for each subsequent year. Apple takes the same cut of all digital purchases on the App Store, and the Cupertino company is not known for making exceptions to its rules.

Musk's request would not work with the current in-app purchase setup as Apple is collecting its fee from each subscriber who pays a creator rather than from the creator directly.

Facebook has protested the fee that Apple collects from the Facebook subscription option for creators, but Apple has not changed its policies. Facebook instead encourages people to support creators by subscribing on the web rather than on a mobile device, which is a method that Musk could use to limit the fees that Apple takes.

Musk has in the past criticized Apple's App Store fees, calling the cut that Apple collects "definitely not ok" and likening it to a "30% tax on the internet."

Article Link: Elon Musk Wants Apple to Lower Fees for 'X' Creators
 

tripsync

Suspended
Apr 24, 2023
1,160
703
Now Elon haters should say thank you for helping creators earn more money.

What kind of mental gymnastics are they going to pull now to justify their hate?

Do they hate on Apple for not allowing sideloading or hate the billionaire space man? Decisions decisions...🤣
 
Last edited:

CookItOff

macrumors member
Jun 11, 2023
60
250
Asking for a friend… Is this like Brand X putting up a table at Walmart and getting people to sign up on their way in and out of the Walmart, and then not expecting Walmart to take a cut for the traffic they provided? VS people just randomly finding Brand X’s store on the street and Brand X getting the full commission albeit very little traffic?
 

lotones

macrumors regular
Aug 6, 2010
149
193
Takes a real tool to spend $44 billion to buy and ruin a social platform millions of people used everyday, then sue a NON-PROFIT for "scaring away advertisers" when they tell the truth about how you invited racists, bigots, and liars back on the platform.

Actually, most tools are helpful. This one is just a self-absorbed fascist-leaning twit.
 

sw1tcher

macrumors 603
Jan 6, 2004
5,417
18,684
Musk said that Twitter does not plan to collect any fees from creators who earn under $100,000. After the $100k mark, Twitter will collect 10 percent of a creator's earnings, though the first 12 months will be free for all creators. If Apple agreed, Apple would be entitled to 30 percent of the 10 percent cut that Twitter takes from creators earning more than $100k.
So if a creator earns under $100K a year, Apple get's $0.

But if a creator earns, say, $200K a year, instead of Apple getting $60,000 (30%), Apple will get $6,000 or 30% of the 10%, or $20,000, that Twitter/X gets?

I'm sure Apple will go along with this idea.
 

TallGuyGT

macrumors 6502
Aug 8, 2011
396
1,005
NYC
Asking for a friend… Is this like Brand X putting up a table at Walmart and getting people to sign up on their way in and out of the Walmart, and then not expecting Walmart to take a cut for the traffic they provided? VS people just randomly finding Brand X’s store on the street and Brand X getting the full commission albeit very little traffic?
Or if a company placed ads on Twitter X and didn't pay for them.
 

tripsync

Suspended
Apr 24, 2023
1,160
703
But he sells "Full Self Driving" capability for $15,000 even though it doesn't exist. (and no, I don't think the beta counts, nor do I think the hardware on current Teslas will ever be capable of full self driving).

$15k is a preorder to lock in the price before they inevitably raise the prices again. And what does that have to do with this topic?
 

GMShadow

macrumors 68000
Jun 8, 2021
1,805
7,416
So if a creator earns under $100K a year, Apple get's $0.

But if a creator earns, say, $200K a year, instead of Apple getting $60,000 (30%), Apple will get $6,000 or 30% of the 10%, or $20,000, that Twitter/X gets?

I'm sure Apple will go along with this idea.

At the same time, it's actually offering Apple *some* fees, which is more than Epic and the rest have done. This might be a move toward trying to negotiate something.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.