Phone numbers as addresses are terrible. They are short-lived, with laws requiring telcos to recycle “inactive” phone numbers within a matter of months. They are easily stolen by bad actors. Caller IDs are easily spoofed. They cease to work overseas, unless you pay exorbitant roaming fees. They change if you move countries.
All of these problems were solved decades ago by superior technologies such as email. And yet the world still revolves around phone numbers. I can’t even book a bus trip without being forced to provide a phone number. Let alone open a bank account, where I lose access to my money if any of the numerous issues I posted above occurs.
The world needs to stop using phone numbers as identification.
Well, that’s the rub. RCS remains a carrier service that uses the cellular data channel instead of the voice channel like SMS and MMS do. The Apple Discussion Communities are seeing users complaining about their iPhones not having the option to turn on RCS, only to find out their carrier either doesn't support it yet or needs to push configuration files. There are complaints about sending texts to an Android user and those texts are still sent using SMS. Then they are informed that not all Android phones have the feature or that the Android user’s carrier doesn't support RCS.Do the carriers have to support it to work cause if so good luck with that
This should already have been done before Apple being required to implement, in my opinion.
isn't WhatsApp totally encrypted? and its cross platform?
Do the carriers have to support it to work cause if so good luck with that
It’s curious… why wasn’t E2EE part of RCS from the beginning?
isn't WhatsApp totally encrypted? and its cross platform?
RCS also works with the Samsung Messages app. I’ve used it with Samsung users and it works.Yes and what's worse, Google is also effectively a gatekeeper for many. RCS only works on Google Messages. Use Textra or anything else and it just doesn't do it, apparently because it's a private API and Google doesn't let anyone use it.
And on their own Google Fi MVNO they have failed to provide Apple with the carrier bundle to enable RCS, so it still doesn't work on iPhone.
I've blocked a subset of my friends who use Android until this is implemented.
RCS also works with the Samsung Messages app. I’ve used it with Samsung users and it works.
How did you communicate with them before?
I've blocked a subset of my friends who use Android until this is implemented.
Samsung started making google messages the default app on their devices a few years ago and are recently phasing out Samsung messages entirely. Google took their approach with google messages because they couldn't get carriers to interoperate their RCS server protocals with each other and it's implementation was dragging on. So they implemented their own servers and bypassed carriers.From what I've heard, the Samsung Messages app is deprecated and will be/has been replaced by Google Messages.
Google Messages remains the de facto single RCS client for Android. They've just managed to create yet another messaging debacle.
I was looking in to this as recently as yesterday. I'd love a link to any other SMS client that supports it, but I know as recently as Monday Textra said they can't do it because Google won't let them. I don't even see Samsung Messages on the Play Store. Maybe it's only on their own app store. And from what I was reading, they were running their own RCS support which has now been discontinued.
Here in the US, all 3 major carriers have support for RCS out of the gate and all but one of their prepaid brands, Mint Mobile being the exception right now. Only independent MVNO's are lagging behind right now for the most part in the US. So it's not that bleak of a picture everywhere.Well, that’s the rub. RCS remains a carrier service that uses the cellular data channel instead of the voice channel like SMS and MMS do. The Apple Discussion Communities are seeing users complaining about their iPhones not having the option to turn on RCS, only to find out their carrier either doesn't support it yet or needs to push configuration files. There are complaints about sending texts to an Android user and those texts are still sent using SMS. Then they are informed that not all Android phones have the feature or that the Android user’s carrier doesn't support RCS.
RCS was greatly hyped and Apple was bludgeoned over not supporting it. People assumed (not a good idea when it comes to tech) that RCS was universally deployed already and Apple was finally giving in. Well, iOS 18 now supports RCS and users are finding out RCS is not universally deployed yet. Not all carriers and not all Android versions support it yet either.
Samsung started making google messages the default app on their devices a few years ago and are recently phasing out Samsung messages entirely. Google took their approach with google messages because they couldn't get carriers to interoperate their RCS server protocals with each other and it's implementation was dragging on. So they implemented their own servers and bypassed carriers.
With the app now the default on any recently sold android phone from the last few years this isn't much of an issue unless people don't like the app. I'm hoping with Apple's involvement now with the RCS standard and carriers, more third party apps like Textra will be able to implement the services now and not be gate kept by Google on Android.
My cell number has been attached to me for 25 years. Of the two email addresses I would have used 25 years ago one the provider is long gone and with it the address and the other isnt one I typically use today.Phone numbers as addresses are terrible. They are short-lived, with laws requiring telcos to recycle “inactive” phone numbers within a matter of months. They are easily stolen by bad actors. Caller IDs are easily spoofed. They cease to work overseas, unless you pay exorbitant roaming fees. They change if you move countries.
All of these problems were solved decades ago by superior technologies such as email. And yet the world still revolves around phone numbers. I can’t even book a bus trip without being forced to provide a phone number. Let alone open a bank account, where I lose access to my money if any of the numerous issues I posted above occurs.
The world needs to stop using phone numbers as identification.
Completely irrelevant in Europe.
Here it's whatsapp town.
All the people I know with an iPhone NEVER used iMessage once.
I wish people would just drop this damn app, so that I could as well...
Oddly enough everyone loved Telegram here...they're in for a cold shower soon enough 🤣
Phone numbers as addresses are terrible. They are short-lived, with laws requiring telcos to recycle “inactive” phone numbers within a matter of months. They are easily stolen by bad actors. Caller IDs are easily spoofed. They cease to work overseas, unless you pay exorbitant roaming fees. They change if you move countries.
All of these problems were solved decades ago by superior technologies such as email. And yet the world still revolves around phone numbers. I can’t even book a bus trip without being forced to provide a phone number. Let alone open a bank account, where I lose access to my money if any of the numerous issues I posted above occurs.
The world needs to stop using phone numbers as identification.
You can keep your mobile number for life.Sure. But you need to agree to Meta's terms to use it.
A decentralized system like RCS is superior, IMO, but it's probably way too late.
I don't know about the world, but the US probably should stop issuing "regional" phone numbers to cell phones. In other countries you can keep your cell number for life.