Maybe they shouldn'tApple and its defenders need to stop pretending this is about privacy, security and convenience. If that that was the case Apple wouldn’t allow any non-Apple IAP in apps whether the good being purchased was digital or physical.
Maybe they shouldn'tApple and its defenders need to stop pretending this is about privacy, security and convenience. If that that was the case Apple wouldn’t allow any non-Apple IAP in apps whether the good being purchased was digital or physical.
Under the new order, Apple is:
So I don't think Apple can tack on new fees when a judge specifically lifted the rules preventing external purchasing mechanisms against In-App Purchasing and communication to the developers web site? Apple has been hosting for example Netflix app on the app-store for free with Netflix website doing all the financial transactions. Smaller developers could be active when right to do the same.
This is probably the best outcome possible. Apple loses. Epic loses. Consumers and every other developer wins. Epic, we thank you for your sacrifice lol!
Seems like a fair ruling, but yet again, the Government sticking its nose where it doesn't deserve to be, by dictating what a private business does with their product.
There are some major inconsistencies in the decision which will likely be challenged on appeal. For instance, the judge makes the injunction nationwide despite only ruling the anti-steering violates California state law. Also, the judge ruled Apple cannot anti-steer payment methods under the injunction, but then found Epic in breach of contract for introducing it's own payment method which is in contradiction to the injunction.
I think this is the most interesting part of the case. No wonder why the stock is slumping. 70% of app store revenue comes from games. And only from 10% of app store users. Massive concentration of revenue that could be at risk with the ruling.
Anyway, epic’s motive for this was something else.
Apple lets developers give their software away for free on the iPlatform with the intent of making the money on transaction fees. Now, developers want to use the Apple iPlatform for free, and not pay Apple for transactions. They want Apple to give away their platform for free.
What are you talking about.....I have safari and Chrome and Google on both of my iDevicesApple can still decide who lives and who dies on the appstore and nuke any developer
at will, without recourse. This is horrible. It just has too much power with the ability to dictate arbitrary rules and add new ones all the time as it sees fit.
Speaking of arbitrary, no other web browser engine than Safari is allowed. That's mind-blowing.
Engine, not browser itself. All of those other browsers are still working with the guts of Safari, so to speak.What are you talking about.....I have safari and Chrome and Google on both of my iDevices
Does not Apple OWN the ecosystem? Whats mind blowing is you think everything should be free.Apple can still decide who lives and who dies on the appstore and nuke any developer
at will, without recourse. This is horrible. It just has too much power with the ability to dictate arbitrary rules and add new ones all the time as it sees fit.
Speaking of arbitrary, no other web browser engine than Safari is allowed. That's mind-blowing.
Okay, but as a consumer, I can still use them and I always use Safari or ChromeEngine, not browser itself. All of those other browsers are still working with the guts of Safari, so to speak.
They poked the bear and got eaten.The judge's ruling makes it clear that Epic Games violated its contract with Apple, and that Apple's decision to terminate Epic's developer account was "valid, lawful, and enforceable."
Let's see how significant those 'savings' are going to be."Fortnite will return to the iOS App Store when and where Epic can offer in-app payment in fair competition with Apple in-app payment, passing along the savings to consumers."
Oh yeah... because it's your choice to not be on the App Store!
That would seem to then open up Apple to a new lawsuit.Not sure all developers win if Apple changes its contract terms to require a cut of all sales, on or off the app store.
Pretty sure it was 20% when Fortnite briefly had third-party payments.Let's see how significant those 'savings' are going to be.
If I had a dollar for every time my son asked when Fortnite was returning to his iPad, I'd have a lot of dollars.I think it's good both Apple and Epic got spanked. Apple should provide its users with as many options as possible for app purchases and payments. Epic should pay a price for violating the terms of its contract with Apple and hurting iOS users.
Change "desperation" for "greed" and you're 100% correct.With this ruling, Fortnite is technically back allowed in the app store even if they want to use their own payment method (as long as Apple restores their dev account). That's all they SHOULD want, and it's what they got. Anything else is just desperation.
Since the injunction against banning Unreal from the AppStore was lifted, how long before Apple bans that developer account?
Apple and its defenders need to stop pretending this is about privacy, security and convenience.
I too used to think Apple cared about privacy and security. Then the CSAM debacle happened.The good news is I'm not pretending. It really is about those things.
I want fewer entities, not many, holding my demographic data, email address, preferences, etc: Privacy.
I want fewer entities to hold my payment information and some semblance that the app I buy isn't malicious: Security.
I want to go to one store to buy what I want: Convenience.
You can handwave "App1e Fanb0yz lol" all you want but there are real reasons I choose to remain in the Apple ecosystem.