Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple and its defenders need to stop pretending this is about privacy, security and convenience. If that that was the case Apple wouldn’t allow any non-Apple IAP in apps whether the good being purchased was digital or physical.
Maybe they shouldn't
 
Under the new order, Apple is:

So I don't think Apple can tack on new fees when a judge specifically lifted the rules preventing external purchasing mechanisms against In-App Purchasing and communication to the developers web site? Apple has been hosting for example Netflix app on the app-store for free with Netflix website doing all the financial transactions. Smaller developers could be active when right to do the same.

Sure they can, the judge did not say charging a fee was illegal, the ruling even said it was legal and enforcable per the contract.

This is probably the best outcome possible. Apple loses. Epic loses. Consumers and every other developer wins. Epic, we thank you for your sacrifice lol!

Not sure all developers win if Apple changes its contract terms to require a cut of all sales, on or off the app store.

Seems like a fair ruling, but yet again, the Government sticking its nose where it doesn't deserve to be, by dictating what a private business does with their product.

There are some major inconsistencies in the decision which will likely be challenged on appeal. For instance, the judge makes the injunction nationwide despite only ruling the anti-steering violates California state law. Also, the judge ruled Apple cannot anti-steer payment methods under the injunction, but then found Epic in breach of contract for introducing it's own payment method which is in contradiction to the injunction.

Two sperate issues - one was illegal under CA law, the other a perfectly legal contract.

I think this is the most interesting part of the case. No wonder why the stock is slumping. 70% of app store revenue comes from games. And only from 10% of app store users. Massive concentration of revenue that could be at risk with the ruling.

Apple will find ways to make up for it form developers.

Anyway, epic’s motive for this was something else.

Yea, they want 100% of IAP revenue plus free access to the app store.

Apple lets developers give their software away for free on the iPlatform with the intent of making the money on transaction fees. Now, developers want to use the Apple iPlatform for free, and not pay Apple for transactions. They want Apple to give away their platform for free.

Isn't going to happen. The upshot to all of this may well be higher costs for iOS developers.
 
Apple can still decide who lives and who dies on the appstore and nuke any developer
at will, without recourse. This is horrible. It just has too much power with the ability to dictate arbitrary rules and add new ones all the time as it sees fit.
Speaking of arbitrary, no other web browser engine than Safari is allowed. That's mind-blowing.
What are you talking about.....I have safari and Chrome and Google on both of my iDevices
 
This is like cutting off your nose to spite your face. You have one of the most popular games in history, and you can get back onto the App Store, and even tell people “hey, if you wanna buy stuff you gotta do it on our site!” now.

The publicity stunt failed, people don’t perceive you as a hero, cut your losses, and take a small victory.
 
Apple can still decide who lives and who dies on the appstore and nuke any developer
at will, without recourse. This is horrible. It just has too much power with the ability to dictate arbitrary rules and add new ones all the time as it sees fit.
Speaking of arbitrary, no other web browser engine than Safari is allowed. That's mind-blowing.
Does not Apple OWN the ecosystem? Whats mind blowing is you think everything should be free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlphaCentauri
It seems like an overall win for Apple as the lowest friction payment option, ApplePay, is probably what people will preferentially pick. We’ll see how the likes of Epic display & label said buttons!

The judge's ruling makes it clear that Epic Games violated its contract with Apple, and that Apple's decision to terminate Epic's developer account was "valid, lawful, and enforceable."
They poked the bear and got eaten.
 
"Fortnite will return to the iOS App Store when and where Epic can offer in-app payment in fair competition with Apple in-app payment, passing along the savings to consumers."

Oh yeah... because it's your choice to not be on the App Store!
Let's see how significant those 'savings' are going to be.
 
Not sure all developers win if Apple changes its contract terms to require a cut of all sales, on or off the app store.
That would seem to then open up Apple to a new lawsuit.

"While the Court has found that evidence suggests Apple’s 30% rate of commission appears inflated, and is potentially anticompetitive, Epic Games did not challenge the rate. Rather, Epic Games challenged the imposition of any commission whatsoever. Nor did plaintiff show either that the provision of the DPLA which required developers."

So if evidence already suggests that Apple's commission is inflated, it only becomes more so when you still pay the commission, but no longer receive the services and benefits of Apple's IAP. Apple would then open themselves up to accusations of rent seeking, as those opting out of using Apple's IAP pay the same rates as those opting in.

Epic's mistake here appears to be attempting to get a free ride rather than pay a reasonable price for the ride.

Additionally, nothing indicates would Apple be entitled to a cut of purchases made outside of the app. Here's the relevant excerpt.

"The Court also notes that in the but-for world where developers could use an alternative processor, Apple would still be contractually entitled to its commission on any purchase made within apps distributed on the App Store."

This would be no different than Netflix and Spotify not giving Apple a cut for purchases not made in the app. Apple is now being forced to treat all apps like they were only allowing "reader" apps to be treated.
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
Reactions: the future
I think it's good both Apple and Epic got spanked. Apple should provide its users with as many options as possible for app purchases and payments. Epic should pay a price for violating the terms of its contract with Apple and hurting iOS users.
If I had a dollar for every time my son asked when Fortnite was returning to his iPad, I'd have a lot of dollars.
 
With this ruling, Fortnite is technically back allowed in the app store even if they want to use their own payment method (as long as Apple restores their dev account). That's all they SHOULD want, and it's what they got. Anything else is just desperation.
Change "desperation" for "greed" and you're 100% correct.
 
Since the injunction against banning Unreal from the AppStore was lifted, how long before Apple bans that developer account?

That would be tough for Epic: If they could not properly support iOS in Unreal, that would drive developers increasingly to Unity. Less Unreal usage would decrease the pull to Epic store (with them waiving Unreal licensing fees there). That might end up being a critical blow in competition with Steam and others...

Apple would get hurt in this as well by causing lots of headaches to 3rd party developers who have built on Unreal. But it might still make sense to crush Epic just to deliver the message for anyone else considering a similar stunt against Apple.

I do not think they will do it. Instead, they will only cut Epic's own games from iOS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mabhatter
Apple and its defenders need to stop pretending this is about privacy, security and convenience.

The good news is I'm not pretending. It really is about those things.

I want fewer entities, not many, holding my demographic data, email address, preferences, etc: Privacy.
I want fewer entities to hold my payment information and some semblance that the app I buy isn't malicious: Security.
I want to go to one store to buy what I want: Convenience.

You can handwave "App1e Fanb0yz lol" all you want but there are real reasons I choose to remain in the Apple ecosystem.
 
What Tim Sweeney tried to do was like if Coca-Cola sued WalMart for not letting them put a Coca-Cola brand vending machine inside WalMart from which Coke would take 100% of the profit. What he got was still the privilege of being able to put up signs inside WalMart advertising a Coke kiosk behind WalMart that sells Coke at 0.70 instead of a dollar. To be sad and defeated over that… what a sad small man.

Don’t bite the hand that feeds you, throw a tantrum because they stopped feeding you for the biting, then whine again because the world didn’t see things in the infantile way you see things, hoping everyone would get mad at the hand and force the hand to feed you despite any biting you’d like to do.

Congrats on the victory, Apple. You never deserved to get bit.
 
The good news is I'm not pretending. It really is about those things.

I want fewer entities, not many, holding my demographic data, email address, preferences, etc: Privacy.
I want fewer entities to hold my payment information and some semblance that the app I buy isn't malicious: Security.
I want to go to one store to buy what I want: Convenience.

You can handwave "App1e Fanb0yz lol" all you want but there are real reasons I choose to remain in the Apple ecosystem.
I too used to think Apple cared about privacy and security. Then the CSAM debacle happened.
 
Tim Sweeny is crying somewhere, and I like that.

He did this all wrong and tried to get a bunch of 11 year olds on his side and failed miserably
 
  • Like
Reactions: brucemr
The judge did a great job, however, this is only a minor win for Epic. They really wanted to have their own payment processing embedded within the game not just links, or to be able to bypass the App Store, altogether.

From Apple’s perspective this will be somewhat annoying but, essentially, they have 90 days to change the relevant App Store rule and maybe come up with a new fee arrangement for apps using their own payment systems. I think they’re drinking champagne in Cupertino
 
  • Like
Reactions: brucemr
Even though I kind of already predicted the outcome at the outset of this lawsuit, I’m still disappointed to see apple winning this round. It seems regulating big tech nowadays has become nearly impossible because they are way too powerful.

Even with other issues looming around Apple, I now can comfortably say they are way too big to fail and there will be no legal path exist to regulate their behaviour. They did whatever they wanted to be what they are today, and will continue to do whatever they want in the future. God bless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brucemr
I wonder if Apple will ever let them back in the App Store. Also, will they kick out Unreal engine? They would potentially really mess things up for Epic with that move.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.