Taking in consideration how fast Apple bends over for CCP I'm sure they can work something out with EU's law and avoid fines.
China doesn't have this insanity.
Taking in consideration how fast Apple bends over for CCP I'm sure they can work something out with EU's law and avoid fines.
So?
Good one 🤣China doesn't have this insanity.
Those fines? That, if a business does not adhere to the new regulations, it effectively takes the profit motive out of operating in the EU? And the fines are not on profits made in the EU, but on profits made OUTSIDE the EU? Fines of this level are clearly punitive.The claim isn't based in reality.
They just want them to give more access to competitors and other businesses. That's it.
I’m just saying that Apple doesn’t get the final say. There are Apple shareholders that are more keenly aware of how these changes will affect their bottom line than anyone here. If those shareholder see material damage to Apple’s profitability by making the proposed changes AND see material drops in Apple revenue by continuing to operate in the region with the fines in place, one of the outcomes could be just to get rid of the App Store in the EU. With no App Store, there’s no more ‘gatekeeper’ as there’s no more ‘Apple monopoly on Apple’s iOS Apple App Store’. Apple’s market share would drop (not too far, they’ve only got 20%Making lots of money in Europe beats making little to money in Europe.
That's why they won't leave.
Nonsens is larger than the GDP of 7 really small(and poor) EU countries.
They aren’t. Everyone can purchase iPhones and Apple is free to distribute compliant products and provide compliant services.run adverts explaining how the politicians caused this and why they are responsible for restricting your right to purchase the new iPhones.
Any company (or even private individual) in America should be familiar with the concept.Fines of this level are clearly punitive.
I‘m still waiting for the business case how Apple would be better off by not making money from the EU than continuing to do.and both the EU and Apple would be fine in the end.
And if the EU wanted JUST that, they could have it. But, they don’t, they want to run Apple’s business. Which, in the end, MAY be acceptable to Apple, may not.LoL, CCP wanted to sit in Apple's chair and the got just that.
Well, I mean, as long as that authoritarian regime isn’t attempting to fundamentally alter the way Apple does business… Which, is kinda funny. If you’d asked me which region, the EU or China would have been the first to try to take over how Apple does business, I’d likely have incorrectly guessed China.This is funny one, anyway it's great to see that "Apple's way of doing business" can align with the habits an authoritarian regime. Really great.
Nah, there’s no way that this would ever be able to be spun into a “not our fault” thing. Far better to just take the actions, maybe with a small neutrally worded announcement including, “We understand the EU regulations and plan to follow them completely”, and then sail off into the sunset.Just don’t sell the new iPhones in Europe. run adverts explaining how the politicians caused this and why they are responsible for restricting your right to purchase the new iPhones. OR sell iPhones with sideloading enabled and charge €5k per handset to offset the potential loss in revenue because of the new EU rules. Again, highlight that it’s like this because of the new rules.
20% is the max fine for violating the law for a second time. You are being deceitful with this attempt to suggest that EU is after 20% of Apple's global revenue.Ah, you're (mostly) right. I'd misread the table I'd linked as being the EU and the nations of the EU, but it was all of Europe.
So, I've corrected my post-- 20% of Apple's revenue is more than the individual GDP of 9 EU nations. As I pointed out, corporate fines could become a massive revenue stream for the EU.
Apple may simply not want to change their business to fit what the EU feels they should be regarding sideloading. In NOT changing, they would be liable to pay the fees and it would be wrong to simply NOT pay the fees. Continuing the same business as they always have, BUT with huge fees on top of it which could cut Apple’s profits in the region in half may not be a business that they want to maintain. Shutting down the App Store in the EU would work to end the ‘gatekeeper’ fines as no one, in the EU, would be installing apps on the iPhone. (EU developers, of course, would still be able to deploy to App Stores in other regions, so their revenue could continue)I‘m still waiting for the business case how Apple would be better off by not making money from the EU than continuing to do.
Even on platforms where sideloading is possible, the dominant store operator makes most of the revenue.
So, Apple merely has to line the coffers of the EU for a few years, change nothing and the EU would be happy with the status quo? My impression is that these would be continual, but if this is just a bit of EU extortion, then Apple could continue to operate, they’d just take a hit to their bottom line for a few years.20% is the max fine for violating the law for a second time. You are being deceitful with this attempt to suggest that EU is after 20% of Apple's global revenue.
And second It's not 9 countries it's 7 like I've wrote, not to mention that it says right in your link that the 2021 revenue was $365.8B not $380.
Nah, there’s no way that this would ever be able to be spun into a “not our fault” thing. Far better to just take the actions, maybe with a small neutrally worded announcement including, “We understand the EU regulations and plan to follow them completely”, and then sail off into the sunset.Apple will continue making billions in other countries, and the EU will continue to thrive as well.
Of course not, EU is a democracy, they don't have the same goals China has.And if the EU wanted JUST that, they could have it. But, they don’t, they want to run Apple’s business. Which, in the end, MAY be acceptable to Apple, may not.
The really funny thing is how CCP's desire to control and oversee every move of their citizens aligns with Apple's way of doing business.Well, I mean, as long as that authoritarian regime isn’t attempting to fundamentally alter the way Apple does business… Which, is kinda funny. If you’d asked me which region, the EU or China would have been the first to try to take over how Apple does business, I’d likely have incorrectly guessed China.
...and no one in their right mind would be buying iPhones for hundreds of Euros without installable third-party apps.Shutting down the App Store in the EU would work to end the ‘gatekeeper’ fines as no one, in the EU, would be installing apps on the iPhone
I'm not sure why you'd deliberately crappify the phone/OS. A phone with no first-party apps, backup support isn't going to sell well.Simply create another iOS:
1. iOS 16 - Worldwide (as Apple see it)
2. iOS 16 - Gatekeeper (where the phone starts and you have only apps: phone and browser. That’s! No back up solution, no update, no support. In one word Freedom (who requested it))!
LoL, good jokes.So, Apple merely has to line the coffers of the EU for a few years, change nothing and the EU would be happy with the status quo? My impression is that these would be continual, but if this is just a bit of EU extortion, then Apple could continue to operate, they’d just take a hit to their bottom line for a few years.
Huh?Sideloading??
This is about stores building user-purchase-profiles and tracking your every move in life. And probably even more than that since they'll have access to even more hardware data than ever before. This is a privacy disaster and you think "just don't side load" even begins to address that problem?
No Europe is still quite a bit bigger than China. You are probably getting confused as China is the second biggest single country but the EU is a massive collection of countries.$90 billion in revenue? That’s US numbers. China is second and the EU is third with quite a bit less than $90 billion in revenue.
Huh?
This EU law is mandating that Apple give users certain options—to replace default apps, to sideload, to use hardware features such as NFC. It is not preventing the use of Apple Pay, or mandating that you install apps which invade your privacy.
What is the scenario you're worried about?
To be fair the cookie nag screens are awful. You can get used to them though there’s plugins and extensions even on iPhone now that just hide them plus auto fill with settings you want.Well I can't wait to see kind of horrible unintended consequences will come from this (see cookie nag screens everywhere). I can see many people accidentally uninstalling Safari and the App Store and then they have no way of putting anything else on their phone (I work with people that only own an iPhone and don't even have a computer they could use to sideload apps back onto it).
You are aware of the GDPR which protects you from these things that you mention?
Why? The standard is already there, RCS. If every app must comply to RCS, you have interoperability. Of course iMessage would have exclusive and richer features, but at least some of them like read receipt, groups, file sharing... are supported