Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
1. We never gave £350 million per week to the EU after rebates and income from other schemes.

2. £350 million per week sounds a lot but is a negligible drop in the ocean compared to the actual NHS funding (over 2.5 Billion per week) and would have no measurable impact.
You may want to check your work: 350 mn/2.5 bn = 14%.
 
Nigel, who loves everything British and dislikes Europe, but who married an Irish and then German nationals.
Nigel, who's childern hold both German and British passports and speak "perfect" German.
and who's lineage is German on one side of his family.

the man is a parody of himself, and rather ironically the only place that would give him a seat at in government was the EU, the UK wouldn't touch him with a barge pole
You are certainly right, but what is wrong with the British people? Why did they believe such a liar when the rest of the world has always known what a charlatan this guy is.
Or does their royal democracy have a problem?

If 1.3 million of the 33.5 million voters had voted differently, the system would not have been completely overturned. 1.3 million can be bought with demagoguery (£350 million a week slogans, bureaucratic horror-picture sermons...) in any Third World country.

It was astonishing that even a former European industrialised country, some with a high level of education, was so permanently infected. Shocking. A country with lots of lovely people is sinking into insignificance.
 
Last edited:
Jealous of all our EU friends getting free roaming #UK
For now. The old contracts / agreements between EU and UK prociders from pre-brexit are still in place. The UK ones therefor grab some extra revenue, at no additional cost.

when those contract end, presumable in the next 3 years, this will change as well.
 
For some perspective of how this was portrayed in the UK.

During the transition period (after the vote already happened to leave) when we (the UK) were negotiating our exit from the EU some said we wouldn't lose this roaming benefit.

And of course we have done so. And you can pretty much put on probably 100 other things people said we wouldn't lose, the beneficial aspects of being a EU member that we have lost. I'm yet to see any benefits to leaving to be honest with you.
Uh…vaccines. Have you forgotten that one already
 
Uh…vaccines. Have you forgotten that one already
That one never existed. We already had our own drug and vaccine approval program. Even the BBC reported we wouldn't have been hindered by being in the EU in our vaccine rollout program:

The MHRA is well-regarded as a world leader in the regulation of medicine, and it has certainly chosen to move faster with vaccine approval than the EMA.

"Our speed or our progress has been totally dependent on the availability of data in our rolling review, and the rigorous assessment and independent advice we have received," Dr Raine said.
But again, the MHRA didn't have to rely on Brexit to do that.
Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/55163730
 
In many countries getting a SIM (e- or otherwise) it’s not that simple and it involves filling forms with personal info and having ID (or passport) scanned or photocopied by shop staff. Maybe not everybody is willing to do that, and often these forms are all in the local language. That being said the free roaming, although extremely convenient is certainly not the only benefit of EU membership. Free trade and membership of the common market outweighs by itself the cost of eu membership. The U.K. has already lost more than they ever paid in decades of membership, and it has just left.
 
The £350m figure was genius as it got Remain constantly speaking about EU budget which was a very weak area for Remain. Whether the net figure was £350m or £250m a week either was a campaign win for Leave
Sure, very clever, I’m sure the naughty minds behind this sneaky move will enjoy watching the smoking ruin U.K. economy is becoming. History will not be kind of them, so they should enjoy their brief moment of glory.
 
Originally, EE, O2, Three, and Vodafone, representing the largest mobile operators in the UK, stated they had no plans to reintroduce roaming charges after Brexit, but all have since announced changes, some under a "fair use"
What a surprise, “we won’t do that” until they are allowed to do it
 
I knew I was missing a couple levels of bureaucracy. Thanks! :)
The elected EU member governments negotiate and vote on relevant EU matters in the European Council (with even a veto for each elected government on critical matters), as do the elected MEPs in the European Parliament. The Commission is jointly nominated by the elected heads of national governments similar to a national cabinet but are then also elected (confirmed or rejected)by the elected MEPs.

The word you had been grasping for without success is democratic processes. All significant decisions in the EU are actually based on democratic processes, Brexit propaganda has just successfully spread near-complete ignorance about that in the UK.

Which is sort of understandable when you're only used to the cash-for-honors system in the UK with an unelected upper house, an unelected monarch effectively above the law and secretly interfering with legislation and an electoral system which doesn't even satisfy basic democratic norms (heavily distorted majorities effectively independent of actual vote shares – the UK could only keep that system within the EU because it was "grandfathered in" back then; Nowadays that alone would already prevent the UK from rejoining the EU, one of many special privileges the UK has now lost irrevocably).
 
You are certainly right, but what is wrong with the British people? Why did they believe such a liar when the rest of the world has always known what a charlatan this guy is.
Or does their royal democracy have a problem?

If 1.3 million of the 33.5 million voters had voted differently, the system would not have been completely overturned. 1.3 million can be bought with demagoguery (£350 million a week slogans, bureaucratic horror-picture sermons...) in any Third World country.

It was astonishing that even a former European industrialised country, some with a high level of education, was so permanently infected. Shocking. A country with lots of lovely people is sinking into insignificance.
The reason they believed him I’ve that unfortunately despite the tolerant image that is often portrayed. England (in particular) is quite hostile and isolationist.

There’s also a significant proportion of the population who are either racist or participate in casual racism.

The UK isn’t the friendly, tolerant nation it wants people to believe.
 
For some perspective of how this was portrayed in the UK.

During the transition period (after the vote already happened to leave) when we (the UK) were negotiating our exit from the EU some said we wouldn't lose this roaming benefit.

And of course we have done so. And you can pretty much put on probably 100 other things people said we wouldn't lose, the beneficial aspects of being a EU member that we have lost. I'm yet to see any benefits to leaving to be honest with you.
Surely there's suddenly a lot less foreigners taking all the jobs ;)
 
Nigel, who loves everything British and dislikes Europe, but who married an Irish and then German nationals.
Nigel, who's childern hold both German and British passports and speak "perfect" German.
and who's lineage is German on one side of his family.

the man is a parody of himself, and rather ironically the only place that would give him a seat at in government was the EU, the UK wouldn't touch him with a barge pole
Now you're just reminding me that your entire royal family are Germans 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: constructor


So-called mobile phone "roaming" will remain free within the European Union for another decade, the European Commission has confirmed.

European-Commisssion.jpg

The governing body said that a political agreement had been reached between the member states and the European Parliament to extend the practice until 2032.

In a press release announcing the agreement to extend the free roaming policy, the European Commission said:
Prior to 2017, when roaming charges were abolished in the EU, holidaymakers and business travelers across Europe would often be stung by excessive phone bills when they got home, with network operators charging exorbitant fees for calls, text, and data used abroad.

Years of campaigning saw the practice scrapped in the EU, meaning mobile customers generally no longer have to worry about roaming charges when using their phone in the EU, with most phone tariffs counting calls, texts, and data used in EU countries as equivalent to domestic use.

Commenting on the latest agreement to extend the practice, commissioner for the internal market Thierry Breton said: "Spending holidays in Greece, Austria or Bulgaria, visiting customers or suppliers in Italy or Estonia… traveling abroad without having to worry about phone bills is a tangible part of the EU Single Market experience for all Europeans."

Given that the United Kingdom has formally exited the European Union, UK residents won't be able to enjoy the benefits of free roaming when they use their phones abroad.

Indeed, when the EU trade deal was signed in December 2020, mobile operators were once again able to charge customers when traveling in Europe with "transparent and reasonable rates."

Originally, EE, O2, Three, and Vodafone, representing the largest mobile operators in the UK, stated they had no plans to reintroduce roaming charges after Brexit, but all have since announced changes, some under a "fair use" clause.

Article Link: EU Member States Agree to Extend Free Mobile Roaming Policy Until 2032
Except of course ‘free roaming’ doesn’t actually happen. Foreign telcos still pass the charges run up when someone is abroad to the telco in the person’s home country. Under ‘free roaming’ these costs are shared out to everyones bills instead of just the people running up the bills.
So all that ‘free roaming’ does is ensure that poor people who never travel in the EU end up subsidising the calls of those who do.
 
Nigel, who loves everything British and dislikes Europe, but who married an Irish and then German nationals.
Nigel, who's childern hold both German and British passports and speak "perfect" German.
and who's lineage is German on one side of his family.

the man is a parody of himself, and rather ironically the only place that would give him a seat at in government was the EU, the UK wouldn't touch him with a barge pole
Another Remainiac who can’t differentiate between the “EU” and “Europe” 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lemon Mac
Except of course ‘free roaming’ doesn’t actually happen. Foreign telcos still pass the charges run up when someone is abroad to the telco in the person’s home country. Under ‘free roaming’ these costs are shared out to everyones bills instead of just the people running up the bills.
So all that ‘free roaming’ does is ensure that poor people who never travel in the EU end up subsidising the calls of those who do.
In the age of near-universal IP infrastructure even for voice communication those costs are really just marginal any more, not remotely on the level of old-time expensive switched phone lines.

So what Telcos were doing there was really just scalping their customers without actual costs justifying the outrageous markup and you're sounding rather desperate to justify another Brexit turd being delivered as predicted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.