EU Moves One Step Closer to Mandating Apple to Switch iPhone, iPad, and AirPods to USB-C

"Take the USB-C software you already have in iOS/iPadOS and that you've already enabled in iPads, and also enable it in the iPhone, then switch the iPhone port from Lightning to USB-C"

Was that supposed to be hard?
“And while you’re at it, make it so it runs Andriod, they’re both phones, right?”

The ability to type something is easy. It’s vastly different from the ability to implement something. Especially something they don’t have a lot of experience with. When was the last time any company in the EU designed a phone? :)
 
This is going to be a mess. The next standard will come along and it'll take years and years to adopt it because they won't bother to pass new legislation to update things.

It's rarely good when government regulates tech. It generally leads to holding everything back.
The legislation doesn't force USB-C, it only forces an industry standard. If the industry as a whole decided in 2024 to move to USB-D, they could do that.
 
Like almost everything else in your life that is dictated by government standards and regulations. The horror.
I see your point ?, but my point is that this is about technology. Competition begets progress, regulation stability. You need both, but for tech I lean towards competition. And so does the EU by the way, just not where it comes to charging cables.
 
I see your point ?, but my point is that this is about technology. Competition begets progress, regulation stability. You need both, but for tech I lean towards competition. And so does the EU by the way, just not where it comes to charging cables.
Do you claim there is no competition in the aviation and automotive industries?

Those are two industries locked down extremely heavily with standards and regulations. Both are extremely competitive.
 
The only reason the lightning port lives on is for that sweet $$$ Apple receives from third-party licensors. From a user's point of view, it clearly sucks that you can't charge all your Apple devices with the same USB-C interface. Hopefully, this will finally give Apple a kick in the butt to get with the times and drop it.
 
I can’t believe some people are favouring Apple over this. It’s just a port. It won’t affect iPhones design neither hold Apple from moving forward for gods shake.
 
…often used a propiertery standard and not often with a good enough justification…
Assuming the company isn’t violating the rights of individuals, I think the consumer should decide what counts as “good enough justification.”
 
You dropped a decimal point...
He
So because new, superior tech will inevitably emerge we’re just supposed to let businesses do proprietary in whatever direction they choose for something as arbitrary as charging and data transfer?

Yes, power input and data transfer speeds will increase in the future. That’s inevitable.

But this isn’t rocket ships or nuclear reactors the EU is trying to regulate here. It’s charging ports and cables, nothing else. It’s plain old plastic and rubber insulation and copper wire paired with transistors and chips for getting electricity and data transferred to your phone.

If Apple can give you the exact same charging experience on iPads Pro as on iPhones but higher data transfer than Lightning then surely they can do the exact same thing on iPhones. What would get in the way for this or make it bad on iPhones?

Why not look at the upside -If anyone can take USB-C and make it even better than the competition and Lightning then it’s Apple.

This regulation cannot happen too fast. I’d want it from tomorrow if it were possible.

Nothing has ever been more common sense.
As I said in my first post: I personally welcome this. Bring on the Thunderbolt 4 iPhones! The industry has been moving towards a single charging/data interface standard for a long time, and USB-C (the plug) is where we are currently converging to anyway. However, we’ve been here before! And even this type of interface would evolve to a new standard (USB-D ?) that is more waterproof, less susceptible to dust, stronger, supporting higher power/data throughput or whatever. With this standardization progress will slow down in my opinion. But one standard will be nice?
 
The Soviet Union left production decisions up to government, how did that turn out?
I'm sure there is a good, comfortable place somewhere between the extremes of outright anarchy and soviet style governance - no point in comparing the phone-connector regulation to either.
How does government forcing a one-size-fits-all solution permit us to live in freedom, protect us from monoplies, and create an environment that allows innovation to flourish and enabling the development of new products? It runs counter to all those ideals.
With the connector, we're talking about an interface. And interfaces must be standardized to enable a free development and competition on either side of it.
You sound like someone who thinks that good decisions are made by amateurs sitting around a table and thinking hard. Free markets lead to much better outcomes by testing ideas in the market and selecting for those that succeed.
I think it's a bit arrogant to consider EU governing bodies and their experts a bunch of amateurs... And we had a free market for the smartphone charger for almost 15 years now - not such a short time before finally standardizing this interface (between device and power supply / periphery).
Mind you - only within the EU and only until there's a far more capable successor standard to USB-C.
That's not to say there aren't times when government needs to step in and fix distortions in the market, but do we really think the charging port is worth of the heavy hand of government?
Where's the heavy hand? I'm sure that phone manufacturers have been heard and voiced their opinion. And I personally believe that Apple is quite happy to finally be able to move its final products from the obsolete Lightning to USB-C - without having to take the blame this time round.
 
That would be fantastic.
It’s a dumb idea. It hinders progress. USB-C is a bit of a mess, with all the Alt-modes, etc. This would preclude the USB-IF from developing a USB-D standard in the future to resolve these issues.

Imagine if the EU tried to impose Micro-USB as a universal port. They actually considered it.
 
“The Party now dictates that one must eat one part of meat and three parts of vegetables every day. Oh and also one must recite the great words of Dear Leader every day for at least one hour. These are good to our citizens’ health and we will all live in a harmonious healthy socialist society.”
Hah, right? Imagine prohibiting children their freedom to shoot each other up in a school. Damn, socialists in Europe!
 
OK. But based on your user ID, you're US based - so why do you really care about European legislation then?
Here in Europe, most of us actually like to be governed effectively (not minimalistically) where it's good for EU citizens. Through a democratic process, and with the freedom of choosing between various different parties.

The outcome of the legislation wouldn't affect me even if we were talking about US legistlation. Like I said, I don't care if Apple uses Lightning or USB-C. I'm just saying this kind of thing is not something any government should be meddling in. How is this good for EU citizens? You already had a choice to buy other phones if you didn't like the fact that the iPhone uses Lightning. And this isn't them governing you - it's them trying to regulate a data/charging port standard device manufacturers use. Ridiculous. All it does is set precendent for progessively more and more invasive government control. But if you want that, I guess you're going to get it! I say be careful what you wish for.
 
Last edited:
This is going to be a mess. The next standard will come along and it'll take years and years to adopt it because they won't bother to pass new legislation to update things.

It's rarely good when government regulates tech. It generally leads to holding everything back.
Not necessarily true. The EU imposed the GSM standard in the 1990's and that gave Europe a large head start in cell phone deployment compared to the US. Didn't stifle innovation a bit.
 
while I totally do not like that politicians make these kind of mandates - Apple and all the others had plenty time to move towards USB-C across the board rather than continuing with proprietary crap.
For us consumers, it's a good thing.
Going "portliest" esp wireless charging, while convenient, it's counter environmentally friendly, wireless charging is just so inefficient
The largest iPhone battery is less than 17 watt-hours. If you drain it fully each day and charge it wirelessly with a very inefficient charger you are talking <6kwh a year. So worst case scenario, wireless charging is going to cost you a dollar/euro or two per year. If you binge watch a few seasons of a TV show on your iPhone instead of an LCD TV you saved your 6kwh right there.
 
It’s a dumb idea. It hinders progress. USB-C is a bit of a mess, with all the Alt-modes, etc. This would preclude the USB-IF from developing a USB-D standard in the future to resolve these issues.

Imagine if the EU tried to impose Micro-USB as a universal port. They actually considered it.
Imagine if they tried to impose mini-USB. Now that would've been the worst.

Agreed though - USB C is a mess. Most USB C cables only support USB2 speeds. Not all USB C chargers will charge all USB C devices.
I do, however, know that all my lightning chargers will charge all my lightening devices. Even if it's slow, I know it'll work. That's better than actual incompatibility.
 
Here in Europe, most of us actually like to be governed effectively (not minimalistically) where it's good for EU citizens. Through a democratic process, and with the freedom of choosing between various different parties.
This is the attitude that made me leave Europe. I prefer not to be "governed" but rather to self-govern. I'm a big boy.

I prefer minimal government with a remit to establish Justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to me and posterity.

Till those things are solved for, I definitely don't need some stooge in Brussels spending their time legislating what port my phone needs to have. I don't need to have my technology preferences dictated to me thank you very much.
 
Wonder if the EU have figured out that the only thing standard about USB-C is the physical connector. Everything else is open to manufacturers to do what the hell they want.
They know, they explicitly states in the standard the Typ C port. And USB Powerdelivery 2.0 to be universally supported. Then it’s assumed they will same protocol of whatever port the computer uses(usb?) and proprietary charging standards can be used as long as USB PD2.0 is the fallback. They allow it to the market and manufacturers to negotiate the details as long as the fundamental parts are compatible.
I reflect on a case when one of my colleagues asked if I had a USB-C cable for his phone. I said I think so, and gave him a type-A to type-C cable. It didn't work because it was apparently a data-only cable.
That’s not EUs concern, that’s up to the USB group to regulate how cables are allowed to be made. But EU want the cables and ports the device manufacturers provide to meet a higher standard of interoperability. A Samsung cable and iPhone cable should be able to be used interchangeably to provide fast charging and data transfer.
You don't have that problem with Lightning. Plug in a Lightning cable and it will work as expected (and should).
Unless it’s a cheap knockoff
Perhaps the EU should focus on more pressing issues like finding a way to stop paying obscene amounts of money to Russia for gas supply, which is indirectly funding the atrocities in Ukraine.
That’s a German and Italian issue EU is currently dealing with. And you can work on more than two things at the same time
EU regulations, because of those guys we have to click "Accept cookies" on every good damn site we visit.
I don't know what will happen with some new better/faster ports that future might bring? Are we stuck with USB-C forever now?

Still, looking forward for iPhone with USB-C. ? I will finally be able to plug the same (usb-c) headphones in my mac and my iPhone.
I don’t think EU will apologize forcing companies to tell you exactly what data they want to sell. You can always klick no xD

But yes I’m waiting to buy a new iPhone and toss all my lightning cables in the trash considering 99% of my things have USB C port.
Headphones, Xbox controller, camera, mouse, iPad Pro, Apple Watch, charging bricks.

Only my iPhone that needs to be changed
 
EU: "Time for everyone to use USB-C"
Apple: *releases port-less iPhone.
EU: *shocked Pikachu face
More like,
EU: "Time for everyone to use USB-C"
Apple: *releases port-less iPhone.
EU: Okay, I am fining you 10% of your worldwide revenue
Apple: So, what?
EU: No problem, I am now fining you 20% of your worldwide revenue
Apple: Ok, Ok, I get it. Puts USB-Cs on all products.
Apple Fans: USB-C is the best port in the world :)/s
 
[…]

But yes I’m waiting to buy a new iPhone and toss all my lightning cables in the trash considering 99% of my things have USB C port.
Headphones, Xbox controller, camera, mouse, iPad Pro, Apple Watch, charging bricks.

Only my iPhone that needs to be changed
Probably 2023. 2024 at the latest.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top