Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What are the biggest tech companies in Europe?
  1. Accenture (Ireland) - $39.1B. Accenture is a professional and technology services company headquartered in Ireland. ...
  2. SAP (Germany) - $27.4B. ...
  3. Capgemini (France) - $14.35B. ...
  4. ATOS (France) - $14.3B. ...
  5. T-Systems (Germany) - $7.74B. ...
  6. Computacenter (UK) - $5.74B. ...
  7. Amadeus IT Group (Spain) - $5.5B. ...
  8. Micro Focus (UK) - $4.8B.
US companies do real well b/c they use other countries for lower taxes, but stay here when it suits them in not having to deal with EU's so called "bs". As much as I don't like government overreach, corporate overreach can be VERY BAD. And Apple having trillions in the bank means they have the potential to be far worse than any government or company in the world. Remember that 1984 commercial where Apple mocks the Big Brother from 1984? Don't kid yourselves.. Apple was like that. It's just that they did a better job of hiding it back then was all. This even comes from big Apple fans who are heavily invested in not only iOS, but also MacOS as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dk001
Oh please. I said I plainly said I don't know what they do and note that you strategically removed my part about shell companies of which Apple has many.
If you seriously believe that no shenanigans go on at Apple then I'd have to say you sound deluded. Whether other companies engage in it is irrelevant. Apple have have a more than noticeable number of shady privacy scandals.

I use both devices when necessary. I'm not drowned in Apple flavoured sugary drinks.
Quote where I said that no shenanigans go on at Apple, I'm not going to defend strawman arguments
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
Apple having trillions in the bank means they have the potential to be far worse than any government or company in the world.
Apple "only" has around $50 billion in cash on hand. Their total assets are around $350 billion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
Apple "only" has around $50 billion in cash on hand. Their total assets are around $350 billion.
Correct. Yeah, "$3 trillion company" vs. "in the bank" was what I should've been more careful in distinction. However, this doesn't make Apple any less dangerous.
 
Second-hand sales have nothing to do with the potential EU regulation. The requirements for being classified as a gatekeeper were posted earlier. Something like the Xbox would seem to qualify.

I'm sorry, but Xbox and PlayStation aren't even close to fulfilling the requirements. Globally there are 60 million sold Xbox One/series x consoles.

more than 45 million monthly active end users established or located in the Union and more than 10 000 yearly active business users established in the Union in the last financial year
they are far away form this in EU.
  1. (…) has a significant impact on the internal market;
close to no impact
  1. it operates a core platform service which serves as an important gateway for business users to reach end users; and
users have multiple avenues to purchase games without using the xbox store
 
Correct. Yeah, "$3 trillion company" vs. "in the bank" was what I should've been more careful in distinction. However, this doesn't make Apple any less dangerous.
I'd argue $50 billion vs "trillions" does certainly make you less dangerous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
I don’t think anyone’s saying that Apple doesn’t need to follow them. They’re saying they are silly. If they’re put in place, Apple will of course have to follow them. If they end up costing Apple more than they can make off of the minority marketshare they hold in the EU, then Apple’s shareholders won’t support Apple doing business at a loss. Apple will lose money and EU users that really want Apple devices will pay gray market prices for them.

Remember, this is the same EU that told technology companies to standardize on Mini USB, so there’s some history indicating decisions they make are silly.
Same difference...
Apple doesn't want to follow EU laws because they think they're silly
Developers don't want to play by Apple's rules because they think they're silly
 
I'm sorry, but Xbox and PlayStation aren't even close to fulfilling the requirements. Globally there are 60 million sold Xbox One/series x consoles.
Microsoft said that they surpassed 100 million active Xbox live subscribers over a year ago. And not every Xbox user is on Live.
 
There is no "lock-in" with iMessage. You can easily switch to other services.
You can't use any other application to send text, but apple's iMessage app.
Why should a multi-billion dollar investment not be allowed to give you an advantage?!? That's just silly. Antitrust actions are generally about preventing competition, not having a competitive advantage. Of course, most people commenting on this topic can't tell the difference.
If they have the best product, they should succeed on the merit of the product, not the size of the user base

WhatsApp and telegram can attract users by having the best messaging service and functions, instead of the most users.
 
Second-hand sales have nothing to do with the potential EU regulation. The requirements for being classified as a gatekeeper were posted earlier. Something like the Xbox would seem to qualify.

They may not meet the 45 million EU citizen active monthly subscriber threshold. I think they are in the 25 million subscriber range globally. I have yet to see any reporting on the DMA applying to game console makers and they specifically exempted smart TVs so its difficult to know for sure what applies
 
You can't use any other application to send text, but apple's iMessage app.
Sure you can. Whatsapp, Messenger, etc.

If they have the best product, they should succeed on the merit of the product, not the size of the user base

WhatsApp and telegram can attract users by having the best messaging service and functions, instead of the most users.
That's certainly your opinion.
 
Microsoft said that they surpassed 100 million active Xbox live subscribers over a year ago. And not every Xbox user is on Live.
unless 50% of those exist in EU they do not fulfill this requirment.

do they have 10.000 actuve buisness users in EU?
the undertaking to which it belongs achieves an annual EEA turnover equal to or above EUR 6.5 billion in the last three financial years, or where the average market capitalisation or the equivalent fair market value of the undertaking to which it belongs amounted to at least EUR 65 billion in the last financial year, and it provides a core platform service in at least three Member States;

Do the have this revenue in EU?

You must fulfill every criterion listed in the DMA to be identified as a gatekeeper.
 
They may not meet the 45 million EU citizen active monthly subscriber threshold.
Fair enough, but the metric is users, not subscribers. My point was that the second-hand market for video games has nothing to do with it. :)

I think they are in the 25 million subscriber range globally. I have yet to see any reporting on the DMA applying to game console makers and they specifically exempted smart TVs so its difficult to know for sure what applies
Nope. They have over 100 million Live subscribers globally. Even more users.
 
unless 50% of those exist in EU they do not fulfill this requirment.
Nope. Less than 45% would do it. But you also have to consider non-subscribers in the user count.

I agree that they might not meet that arbitrary threshhold, but I think it's possible. The point of my original post was that the second-hand market for games is irrelevant to the requirements.
 
You can't use any other application to send text, but apple's iMessage app.
I can send and receive SMS with Skype and Google Voice and a dozen or so other messenger apps on my iPhone. The only limitation is they are not my default SMS app and receiving SMS on my primary number is difficult without forwarding. A third-party default client simply for SMS is not the solution people are really asking for. What they are really asking is for another proprietary messaging stack that just also happens to handle SMS.
 
Last edited:
really? so if i remove the iMessage app on my iPhone i will receive all my SMS text in the WhatsApp, messenger or telegram app that i use as teh default app? must be a new thing apple implemented i have missed
You just switched the goalposts from text messages to SMS messages. Regardless, it doesn't prevent you from switching to Android.

Seems to be the EU line of thinking.
Or your interpretation of it.
 
  • Love
Reactions: CarlJ
They may not meet the 45 million EU citizen active monthly subscriber threshold. I think they are in the 25 million subscriber range globally. I have yet to see any reporting on the DMA applying to game console makers and they specifically exempted smart TVs so its difficult to know for sure what applies
Consoles aren't touched because they don't come close to any of the requirements.

total end users are way too low for the consoles in EU. PC end users aren't included.

What the DMA covers is very detailed, i would say.

This is a core platform service covered by the DMA unless explicitly excluded as an exception
  • online intermediation services,
  • online search engines,
  • online social networking services,
  • video-sharing platform services,
  • number-independent interpersonal communication services,
  • operating systems,
  • cloud computing services,
  • advertising services provided by a provider of any of the services listed before.
 
You just switched the goalposts from text messages to SMS messages. Regardless, it doesn't prevent you from switching to Android.
how am i moving the goal post? text=SMS. i didn't say every message.

switching to an android phone is quite the leap for the minimum ability to receive a simple text in another app
Or your interpretation of it.
we will see
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
No, Apple SHOULDN’T cripple their products, they should merely follow the rules and laws defined by the EU and I don’t think anyone would disagree with that. IF, in the act of following the rules, products end up losing features OR some products become too costly to produce for the defined market, then companies wouldn’t be arbitrarily crippling their products, they’d be meeting the requirements set out by the EU.
The mental gymnastics are amusing. If Apple follows the rules and laws defined by EU they will add features and functionality not cripple the current functionality of their smartphones, like it was constantly suggested in this thread as a way to force apple's EU users to revolt(which won't happen anyway).

And for the last time. The comment I quoted stated the folowing: the threat of millions of devices losing iMessage, FaceTime, and the App Store framed properly will get the public on their side.

It very obviously suggested that Apple should threaten their EU consumers in such a way that they would side with them. It's an obvious blackmail suggestion.

Apple makes almost 20% of their total operating profit in Europe TODAY, under the current rules. Changes like the EU are proposing aren’t free for companies to implement. And, once implemented the ongoing support over time for those changes are also costly.
These are just your assumptions.
There's no objective reason Apple wouldn't just as profitable in terms of percentage in EU after the legislation changes, as the changes are for everybody anyway

If the cost of doing business in the EU rises to the point where that 20% operating profit is reduced to 5%, the shareholders would be asking some REALLY tough questions to Apple’s board about their commitment of dollars towards such a small return.
You are really reaching whit these doom and gloom assumption.

It’s not an argument, it’s a statement.
Nope, it's just a heavily biased assumption that shows lack of real arguments.

It’s only irrelevant because it’s an activity that’s occurring in reality right now where multiple companies based outside of a region are being affected such that it no longer is beneficial to maintain operations in that region. If the EU puts in place new rules and regulations such that multiple companies based outside of a region are being affected such that it no longer is beneficial to maintain operations in that region, THEN it would immediately become relevant. :)
It's irrelevant because it's a totally different situation.
I honestly don't understand the insistence on the hypothetical: "it is no longer is beneficial to maintain operations in EU" whit these new laws, it's just a huge unrealistic exaggeration.
 
Last edited:
Nope. Less than 45% would do it. But you also have to consider non-subscribers in the user count.
That is why I provided the number of sold consoles globally. The question is does the Xbox have CPS with more than 45 million active users in a month? Plus the other requirements
I agree that they might not meet that arbitrary threshhold, but I think it's possible. The point of my original post was that the second-hand market for games is irrelevant to the requirements.
the fact you can purchase games brand new without ever using the Xbox store is a very important metric
it operates a core platform service which serves as an important gateway for business users to reach end users

the Xbox store is not an important gateway to reach Xbox end users.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.