Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
OK as much as I like the sentiment it's all fairy dust until there's a realistic chance of passage and the article already says it's been tabled. This is non-news. And that hasn't even gotten to the technical challenge of "end to end" encryption of all metadata; how will clients find each other the first time or after any change in address?

your confusion probably arises from the fact that "tabled" means the opposite in the US (where I am guessing you are from based the usage) as it does everywhere else.
 
Backdoors are asinine. Look how many flaws become backdoors and how they are exploited, and some never patched.

Having ANY vulnerability in ANY system, welcomes abusers and lessens security for all people that use that system, and anyone that is referenced in that system.
 
I don't trust the EU with its unelected elites deciding on our lives.
It's the same EU that wastes billions, lets in (or even (let) picks up at the other side of the Mediterranean Sea) illegal immigrants by the thousands, ...

As opposed to all those unelected people in Business ?
Multinationals can have a far bigger impact in your life and you have no control/rights over them.

After WWII, the world let in by the thousands immigrants from Europe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: barbu
People's private conversations should remain private, I wholeheartedly support e to e encryption to be law. Governments need to take responsibility for terrorism as its their fault entirely. The people had nothing to do with going to war in the Middle East. I'm sorry but spying on the public even for counterterrorism is unacceptable. Governments should learn that their actions abroad are what caused this mess in the first place and they're going to have to accept that they're gonna have to fix it not just try and prevent future acts. Say sorry, communicate and heal the wounds. Lack of empathy in politics saddens me and I end up asking why are they so cold and heartless.
 
Amber Rudd" said:
The U.K. home secretary Amber Rudd recently claimed that it is "completely unacceptable" that authorities cannot gain access to messages stored on mobile applications protected by end-to-end encryption. A leaked draft technical paper prepared by the U.K. government was leaked shortly after Rudd's comments, containing proposals related to the removal of encryption from private communications.

Our Home Secretary doesn't appear to grasp the concept that if you create a backdoor for the good guys then it's also a route which the bad guys will exploit too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gaspode67
Our Home Secretary doesn't appear to grasp the concept that if you create a backdoor for the good guys then it's also a route which the bad guys will exploit too.

That's because her boss is the old Home Secretary who also didn't understand that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gaspode67
Our Home Secretary doesn't appear to grasp the concept that if you create a backdoor for the good guys then it's also a route which the bad guys will exploit too.

To be honest, I haven't seen *any* politician that's been in the Home Office have the slightest idea about "t'interweb". The idea of banning encryption is the typical "We must be seen to do something. This is something, therefore we'll do it" type of reaction. It wasn't too long ago that the then-Home Secretary (whose name rhymes with Meresa Tay) proposed that all traffic should be trackable, and websites, email addresses logged. Now, anyone with even the most basic of experience in the real world will know that there is no way that international companies would agree to this. Imagine the likes of Apple, Philips, Dell, 3M, etc etc, purposely having their security weakened. It wouldn't happen. Anyone on the road for a company like that uses VPNs to allow access to the office servers for documentation, software, servers, etc. We need politicians who either know how the real world works, or at least to listenb to advisors who know this stuff. Instead, we have MPs, Ministers, and a PM who have basically come up through the typical "PPE/Classics Oxbridge" route with little or no experience of the world outside the Westminster village.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lankyman
What a shock...considering the EU is a subversive communist/globalist entity who don't want their "behind the curtain" manipulations made public. They only wave the "we are on YOUR side flag" when it suits them. If they were truly "on your side" then why did they allow allow the "refugee" invasion to happen?
 
What a shock...considering the EU is a subversive communist/globalist entity who don't want their "behind the curtain" manipulations made public. They only wave the "we are on YOUR side flag" when it suits them. If they were truly "on your side" then why did they allow allow the "refugee" invasion to happen?

You forgot the [/sarcasm] at the end of your post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MLVC
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.