The vast, vast, majority of iPhone users are not MacRumors readers and they don't know the difference between USB C, Lighting or USB A. They do know if you switch connectors on they're favorite smartphones, they will cut you.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
European Lawmakers Want to Force All Smartphones to Have Same Charging Port, Apple Defends Lightning
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
LOL. Shut your face apple, I hate that you've never used the 'regular' cables. And it's obviously been awful for the environment ever since you switched to lightening rather than micro usb. And there's even an iPad with USB C isn't there? FFS.. .
The law can have an expiration. I.e. all phones sold through 2023 must have USB-C ports.
This is the best of both worlds -> simplicity today and flexibility for tomorrow.
Government should have mandated this cable as the standard 30 years ago. Think how that would have saved humanity!
https://www.computercablestore.com/...er-cable-db25-male-to-centronics-36-male.jpeg
https://www.computercablestore.com/...er-cable-db25-male-to-centronics-36-male.jpeg
EBay. Genuine Apple in original packaging, ranging from USD $36 to $54. Not cheap, but Apple (if the packaging and seller statements are to be believed).
I get that you don't want to throw money at it, but if you need it, it's there.
While I agree in principle, I think perhaps we're all conflating the signals with the connector. USB-C is both. IMO, USB-C as a *connector* would be a great universal standard where all manufacturers would support the base requirements. Individual manufacturers could, then, support faster speeds, newer protocols, expanded capabilities, etc. Assuming that these connectors could have a 10-15 year life-span, I would suspect we'll be fully 'wireless' (e.g. NO connectors) long before that happens. Then for those devices that do still require a connector, this could still be a win.
EBay. Genuine Apple in original packaging, ranging from USD $36 to $54. Not cheap, but Apple (if the packaging and seller statements are to be believed).
I get that you don't want to throw money at it, but if you need it, it's there.
Oh my god...don't remind me...nightmarish. Also a reminder that dongles were NOT an Apple invention, either.
The bazillion dollar company, pushed around by a bunch of Euro-bureaucrats.
I kinda like it, to be honest. Especially with all the shenanigans Apple pulls with their power cords and adapters. USB-A to lightning. Lighnting to USB-C. USB-C to USB-C, and so on.
And the crappy adapters still packaged with "flagship" phones.
Watch how fast everything Apple goes to USB-C. It'll be like the blink of an eye...
I kinda like it, to be honest. Especially with all the shenanigans Apple pulls with their power cords and adapters. USB-A to lightning. Lighnting to USB-C. USB-C to USB-C, and so on.
And the crappy adapters still packaged with "flagship" phones.
Watch how fast everything Apple goes to USB-C. It'll be like the blink of an eye...
Will your current phone stop working if this law passed? Did Apple pay people for replacement headphones when they got rid of the headphone jack?
Last edited:
Apple's view might have changed since the time they said this. I agree, USB-C is more than adequate now for a transition but it'll still take years still because lightning is on older phones, ipads, pencil and headphones etc.
I think we all agree that legislation is a last resort and should be avoided if at all possible.
But Apple only have themselves to blame for this. They could have moved to USB-C 2-3 years ago, yet despite their “commitment” they are still making new iPhone models with proprietary lightning ports even today. Legislation may be the only way to stop Apple dragging its heels on this.
I work in a school that has a bunch of iPads in each class. A while ago, we got iPad charging stations from this company called Hercules Tuff. The charging stations & the lightning cables were super cheap (both price & quality). They broke easily, so I had to replace them. Plus, pretty poor customer service. I'll never buy from them again.
As for going to USB-C, I'm meh. So many accessories are already for lightning, so you'll have a lot of trash and/or adaptors needed, not to mention a lot of angry users. On the other hand, it will allow for a much broader range of accessories, too.
It would be interesting to see what would happen if iPads went to Thunderbolt 3/USB 4. I'd like to see what kind transfer speeds they would have with other iPads/Macs, as well as accessories.
Something I'd love to see, but know it'll never happen, is also add an SD card to iPhones & iPads.
As for going to USB-C, I'm meh. So many accessories are already for lightning, so you'll have a lot of trash and/or adaptors needed, not to mention a lot of angry users. On the other hand, it will allow for a much broader range of accessories, too.
It would be interesting to see what would happen if iPads went to Thunderbolt 3/USB 4. I'd like to see what kind transfer speeds they would have with other iPads/Macs, as well as accessories.
Something I'd love to see, but know it'll never happen, is also add an SD card to iPhones & iPads.
I would love for all devices to converge on the USB-C connector, but no two USB-C compatible devices seem to offer the same consistent protocol support, which is a nightmare. Honestly I think they should wait till USB4 is available and mandate a combination of that with USB-C. That way, we get up to 100W Power Delivery, up to 40GB data transfer speeds, full backwards compatibility with older USB standards, and all kinds of other guaranteed capabilities.
Between my Switch, MacBook Pro, iPad Pro and a few other devices, Lightning is slowly becoming obsolete in my home anyway.
Between my Switch, MacBook Pro, iPad Pro and a few other devices, Lightning is slowly becoming obsolete in my home anyway.
Wasn't this what happened when Europe insisted that a common charging port was required? https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MD820AM/A/lightning-to-micro-usb-adapter
I'm not a big fan of lightning because of the fritzed 4th (is it the 4th? others have seen it) pin that happens eventually on cables you have used with devices that draw a lot (arcing on that pin) and eventually renders the cable useless.. I've had 3 cables and an original Belkin Rockstar die this way before I found that the tedious answer is to connect the iPhone or iPad and THEN connect the other end... however, I think that these cables are common enough _not_ to require this kind of standardisation/regulation.. I mean it's not like the old Sony chargers with the wierd ends that were wire into the power brick is it?
I'm not a big fan of lightning because of the fritzed 4th (is it the 4th? others have seen it) pin that happens eventually on cables you have used with devices that draw a lot (arcing on that pin) and eventually renders the cable useless.. I've had 3 cables and an original Belkin Rockstar die this way before I found that the tedious answer is to connect the iPhone or iPad and THEN connect the other end... however, I think that these cables are common enough _not_ to require this kind of standardisation/regulation.. I mean it's not like the old Sony chargers with the wierd ends that were wire into the power brick is it?
sorry, no. The only reason Lightning even exists... licensing.
Apple will soon be moving to USB-C for the iPhone because the USB consortium last year approved the ability for companies to have a certification requirement for certain USB-C cables. This will allow Apple to only allow Apple-approved USB-C cables to be used with iPhones. Apple-approved=company paid a fee.
I'm not going to support some fancy fly-boy parallel standard. Serial served us fine for hundreds of years.
yea, it would make a pleasant change to it being a mega-rich private corporation that changes its mind every 5 years....