From yesterday i have issues with iOS 26 on my 11…… so….. I didn’t feel anything deferent with 17s.@DJTaurus how did it feel in the store? Did it bother you?
From yesterday i have issues with iOS 26 on my 11…… so….. I didn’t feel anything deferent with 17s.@DJTaurus how did it feel in the store? Did it bother you?
There is no sign to be positiveLet the iPhone arrive first before everything is demonized again.😎
I hope you didn’t do test well. Because this is the worst result I ever seen so farView attachment 2552519View attachment 2552526View attachment 2552527
The option doesn't change anything regarding frequency, hence only one screenshot. But the time how long the pixels are black is changed, see PWM on and off. With full brightness I can't see any change. At the moment I don't think it's good enough for me, but have to test first.
Device: iPhone 17 256GB
I would suggest Honor, nothing, Vivo, OP, or Xiaomi. They have better PWM dimming and some of them even better cameras than Apple or Samsung.I still have iOS 17 on my 11 Pro btw, I have a spare device where I tested iOS 18 first and now 26, those are worst iOS updates ever, particularly to ruined Photos app. I no longer can get used to new grid, styles and all this mess.
Not impressed by 17 Pro at all and leaning to go and upgrade to S25 Ultra. I am aware it has bad PWM frequency but Apple gave me no choice. I want camera first, viewing/sorting device second, editing device third. If PWM bothers me a lot I will probably just connect it to monitor for desktop experience, hopefully it has DeX mode.
Now with the news that PWM switch is actually doing nothing, not interested in waiting one more year for it all to be refined because I really need a more modern device and portable camera
View attachment 2552519View attachment 2552526View attachment 2552527
The option doesn't change anything regarding frequency, hence only one screenshot. But the time how long the pixels are black is changed, see PWM on and off. With full brightness I can't see any change. At the moment I don't think it's good enough for me, but have to test first.
Device: iPhone 17 256GB
No change my end after a play in store.
Iphone 17pro, PWM setting off and full brightness.
Immediate discomfort.
(I'll still keep my order which arrives in 2 weeks time but its not looking good)
So all in all, this is another big failure of OLED and continual ignorance of our group? I can't believe they come out PWM feature, while actually doing almost nothing??? Can we all together do something to raise our voice??? 😡
Can this false advertising and misleading feature be categorized into Consumer Deceptive Lawsuit?? Any lawyer in our group, pls advise, what we can do together? I am speechless now....being nice and patient is completely helpless in our century???I just cant believe they sat around a table and agreed on a decision to call it 'Disables pulse width modulation' in the setting wording.
iOS 26 might be giving more people eyestrain simply because its harder to look at with its increased transparency and reduced contrast. The eyes have to struggle more just to see everything clearly. Eye fatigue. It may not be due to increased dithering at all. But I certainly don't know.
What role does Pro Motion play, if any? Would locking the refresh rate to 60Hz stabilize things? I don’t see many people bringing up the Pro Motion fluctuations in terms of it may affect device comfort, given they theoretically can go as low as 1Hz.
iOS 15 was the last usable version of iOS I’ve been able to use on my iPhone 13. I did test iOS 18 on a separate iPhone 13 and it was much more tolerable than iOS 16/17.
Dithering would be the only flicker technique Apple could modify like that (GPU dithering) within a software update, correct?
Ok this might sound cynical... but perhaps whatever new dimming implementation was used on the 17 when that toggle is actuated, isn't actually now defined as pure PWM in the definitive sense. So they can legally say that PWM has been disabled - even though the screen still flickers like hell/Why on earth would Apple choose those words for
If some organization just research data within our forum group, that shall be substantial clinical evidence to prove the significant damage to people's eyes and health. And our eyes health life matter!It’s partially because there has been a lack of research into these particular technologies and also because of a lack of knowledge among users. Most people are unaware PWM and dithering even exists and instead blame symptoms on blue light, screen time, and age. It’s only within the last 5-7 years as companies like Apple have shifted to OLED which relies heavily on PWM and as dithering has been utilized more often to render the P3 colorspace across devices, especially LCD, that more and more users have been affected. At least that is my theory.
We are shifting from sRGB to P3 at a breakneck pace as companies race to market new displays as the most vibrant and PWM modulation is getting worse as smartphone brightness increases. This is a byproduct of a race to beat competitors in terms of display benchmarks, at the expense of health.
As far as the health basis for a lawsuit, you’d be initially relying on decades worth of established epilepsy research. It’s been determined Apple Silicon MacBooks are applying spatiotemporal dithering via the GPU occurring at approximately 15Hz over 4 frames per refresh cycle on a 60Hz refresh rate device. Additionally older Macs and newer Macs have TCON FRC (done via the display panel itself) at approximately 30Hz. These frequencies are well within the epileptic danger zone of 15-30Hz which can trigger seizures, and has triggered them in sensitive users.
More research would have to be done, but the science and data is there.