I mean, isn't that the basis of their whole business, though? Their entire reason for being is to harvest and aggregate all possible data about their users in order to monetize them. It seems odd to expect that they would "keep our data safe" or have regard for user privacy. They exist to destroy your privacy.Facebook can say anything it wants, but their recent past experiences show that they have zero regard for user privacy and for keeping our data safe.
That's a good pro!So easy to cover that led showing you are recording. A dab of black paint, or electrical tape. 3D videos of women’s and men’s gym rooms for sale. Although could come in handy for monitoring police for unjustified use of force…
pretty much, yes.Guess everyone wearing the iconic Wayfarer design is a douchebag, huh?
- Depending on your preferences, we also store and process information about your voice interactions to help improve Facebook Assistant. You can manage voice storage to improve Facebook Assistant in your Settings. You can also access and delete stored information in your Settings or in Your Facebook Information. When voice storage for product improvement is on, we use machine learning and trained reviewers to process information to improve, troubleshoot, and train Facebook Assistant, and we share that information with certain third parties for product improvement. We also share such information for law enforcement purposes or as otherwise required by law as described in the Facebook Data Policy under “How do we respond to legal requests or prevent harm?”.
Fixed it for you as I am not an Apple worshiper.If they had an Apple logo on them,everybodymany on here would be singing their praises to the heavens.
Probably as intended. Remember the original purpose of Zuck creating Facebook.
They spy on every Facebook user in some way, regardless of whether any of them think they’re important enough.
Spying is a badly chosen word; I used it because you used it. What's really happening is that these corporations are making money by treating us like cattle. My pics aren't meant for that, even if they're innocuous. Also, none of my other associated data or metadata is for that. They're not paying me for my participation in their scheme because the "product" they offer me as bait is designed to THWART my preferences while serving their purposes. It's not a balanced exchange in any way.There ain't no such thing as a free lunch. You know what I mean? What they will ‘spy’? Pics of your dog and your trip 2 miami?
Maybe by changing the window of acceptability. We certainly see enough of that going on with insane politicians and their cults, as well as the entire goddamned computer industry (if it uses software, it's effectively unreliable and without warranty, which was unique in all industry until the tech industry pushed its way into everything and lobbied to legally enforce their illegal EULAs and all the special pleading ******** they use to avoid taking any responsibility for their own products).It's absolutely happened, especially with Google Glass -- because those were initially sold to developers, and the general public couldn't yet buy them. That created a lot of paranoia around them, since they weren't a product most people could really try out themselves and see what they really did and didn't do.
A private bar or club can ban whatever they like, just like some enforce arbitrary dress codes (like no tennis shoes). But eventually, I think the idea of glasses with cameras integrated will become mainstream enough that people stop treating it like a special situation. Every smartphone on the planet can do the same stuff and people always have them in hand in these establishments.