Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Totally agree. Now I can focus on real social interactions instead of social media interaction. I still have a Facebook page, but have not posted to it in over two years.

Would both of you like an award or medal for your achievement?
 
I hardly use the app but it is still on my phone. According to usage in settings, over the last 7 days it has used over 4 hours of background task. What is it doing? I need to delete this app.
 
The only thing I could think of why Facebook app is draining battery, because it's running in the background. That means Facebook is doing something other than just a social app. The possibilities are endless if the app is constantly running in the background monitor every activity of the user.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GreginNJ
Delete the app and stop using Facebook period. Your life will improve dramatically. I'm currently three months clean.
I guess you were trying to use it a certain way. Try others maybe? I find it valuable for keeping in touch with friends who moved away, very easy to see where they're up to and vice versa.

Edit: seems like a lot of people got rid of it! I wonder if others considered using it differently, like image sharing amongst distant friends and messaging. You don't need to do status feeds, people :)
 
Maybe this has something to do with the Facebook app continuously playing static over the speaker (at low volume). After you scroll past a video for the first time after opening an app (don't even have to click it and watch it... just scroll past it), you can hear a small amount of static continuously playing from the phone's speaker!

It happens on my phone and my friend's phone... so I assume it's not just us.
This! So much this!
I've noticed it too...
 
  • Like
Reactions: kevo0822
(Disclaimer - I have never used Facebook, so my opinion is based purely on research and observation. Your opinion may differ based upon your own experiences.)

This is always going to be a trade-off:

Facebook has made a decision to make the interaction as friction-free as possible, and in order to do so, it needs to keep running. If they chose not to have it "always on", it could potentially be slower to load, and thus it may be used less. This is a bigger concern for them, because they then lose ad revenue.

Ultimately, it is the choice of the user - if you choose to utilize Facebook, then you have two means of accessing it. The browser will load slower and use more data; the app will use more battery.

BTW - for those that have elected to discontinue use of Facebook, or those that are contemplating discontinuation, the following short video may be of interest:

http://www.businessinsider.com/social-media-impact-brain-relationships-siegel-2014-12

As well as this article:
http://www.businessinsider.com/young-people-flock-away-from-social-media-2016-2
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteveW928
Here's a tip, if you must use AOL, er I mean Facebook (like you're running a business and need a presence) open Facebook in Safari in p0rn, er I mean private mode. No need for the app at all.
 
The only thing I could think of why Facebook app is draining battery, because it's running in the background. That means Facebook is doing something other than just a social app. The possibilities are endless if the app is constantly running in the background monitor every activity of the user.

Or, much like the rest of Facebook, it's a steaming pile of...

I guess you were trying to use it a certain way. Try others maybe? I find it valuable for keeping in touch with friends who moved away, very easy to see where they're up to and vice versa.

Edit: seems like a lot of people got rid of it! I wonder if others considered using it differently, like image sharing amongst distant friends and messaging. You don't need to do status feeds, people :)

Oh, for sure, it has it's usefulness. It's also good for very targeted marketing. The problem is that it's very design will end up being it's demise, which will eventually kill off your use-case, or make it so painful you'll move to some alternative.

Facebook has made a decision to make the interaction as friction-free as possible...
BTW - for those that have elected to discontinue use of Facebook, or those that are contemplating discontinuation, the following short video may be of interest...

Actually, they made the decision to make it more crack-like (the drug), but I get what you're saying. It's designed so if you don't stay on it and constantly keep up with it, it's not useful. I log in now and then to post articles (a lot of folks just automate that), and to check on a small group of friends who haven't figured out how to use more civilized communication methods. So, I probably won't delete my account, but I'm far from their ideal user. :)

And, so long as there are real users using it, they've created a pretty effective finely targeted marketing platform (again, that is, so long as there are real users there, which might not be all that much longer, as you've pointed out).

But, also be aware that all these 'brain changing' studies don't necessarily mean what they claim. The brain is a physical storage device for the mind, so any time you change the input and behavior, of course there will be a difference expressed in the makeup of the storage. Drawing conclusions from that is pretty meaningless though. That's better left to the psychologists.

Here's a tip, if you must use AOL, er I mean Facebook (like you're running a business and need a presence) open Facebook in Safari in p0rn, er I mean private mode. No need for the app at all.

No kidding! As a website developer, I'm constantly fighting this idea that Facebook is a website. Sure, it's a site on the Web, but it's much more akin to AOL or CompuServe than what we now know as a website. Heck, Facebook has even been trying to setup 'Internet' access in various countries, where by 'Internet' it means Facebook. Yikes!
 
  • Like
Reactions: GreginNJ
Would it be safe to assume at this point that they know the battery is going to be affected but they just don't care and keep as much background crap running as possible?

I would love to see an option in iOS to disallow all background activity on a per app basis. Basically when I click the home button in an app it closes completely and doesn't stay in the app switcher. That would be a perfect solution to Facebook. Instead now I have to close the app and then go into the app switcher to really close it.

Don't get it no-one replied to you because...
Actually you can, Settings/General/Background App Refresh
 
Don't get it no-one replied to you because...
Actually you can, Settings/General/Background App Refresh
You beat me to it

And in fact, mine is always off, and the battery usage is way down at the bottom of almost all other programs. So, I have absolutely no battery draining issue with Facebook.

My usage is like: Phone 23%, Mail (I have 4 accounts using push) 15%, Messages 13% and Facebook is 3%.
 
Last edited:
Don't get it no-one replied to you because...
Actually you can, Settings/General/Background App Refresh

Wow I really wish I would have thought of that... you know, like everyone else who was affected by this "bug" the last time around when Facebook was still doing god knows what in the background even with Background App Refresh turned off. I have background refresh turned off for everything and Facebook still uses more battery in the background than when I actually use the app. But thank you for the snarky, albeit uneducated, response.
What I mean for iOS is to completely 100% KILL the app when I push the home button so there is no chance at all it is thinking about or doing anything while it sits in the app switcher. Clearly Facebook's app is an example of how that could help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flowsy
That POS app has been deleted way before the battery drain issues were made public, for battery drain reasons. I use safari, I can peek into it, see an ugly meme, and not pop.
 
Wow I really wish I would have thought of that... you know, like everyone else who was affected by this "bug" the last time around when Facebook was still doing god knows what in the background even with Background App Refresh turned off. I have background refresh turned off for everything and Facebook still uses more battery in the background than when I actually use the app. But thank you for the snarky, albeit uneducated, response.
What I mean for iOS is to completely 100% KILL the app when I push the home button so there is no chance at all it is thinking about or doing anything while it sits in the app switcher. Clearly Facebook's app is an example of how that could help.

If you disallow background refresh for an app and you don't use the app (switch to another App) it shouldn't use anything except for what is in RAM, that is what I know about it, I could be wrong.
The reply was not meant to be snarky, if that's how you feel then accept my apologies.:)
 
Last edited:
I guess you were trying to use it a certain way. Try others maybe? I find it valuable for keeping in touch with friends who moved away, very easy to see where they're up to and vice versa.

Edit: seems like a lot of people got rid of it! I wonder if others considered using it differently, like image sharing amongst distant friends and messaging. You don't need to do status feeds, people :)

I guess that's why I don't "hate" Facebook, all I use it for is keeping in touch with family; maybe a couple of groups. Don't see much reason to hate it besides privacy concerns, (in my opinion) since everything else on the Internet is essentially stalking you one more thing isn't going to matter.
 
This the only app that I have to force close every time I am done with it. Otherwise it will burn through battery in battery in the background even with background refresh disabled. Facebook has no respect for its users. Apple needs to clamp down on intentionally wasteful apps. There should be no way to run in the background if I, as the user, say no.
 
For comparison, for the last 7 days.. Twitter had 11.4 hours on screen and only used 22%. I'd say that's pretty dang good
 
I guess that's why I don't "hate" Facebook, all I use it for is keeping in touch with family; maybe a couple of groups. Don't see much reason to hate it besides privacy concerns, (in my opinion) since everything else on the Internet is essentially stalking you one more thing isn't going to matter.
Yeah, I see people deleting their accounts due to game invites or other silly features. I don't get those because I use it with like-minded people - just to keep in touch with others! It's easier than email, accessible from any device or computer, especially easier when dealing with multiple people at once. And I find it really useful for group calenders too. Where Apple group-calendars only work with other iOS and OSX users, FB ones work with everyone.

Nowhere does it state you have to use Facebook like the stereotype.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.