That's what we need... more cameras around the clock, 360°, everywhere, always.
Big brother is watch-ing you.
That's awesome.Here's an alt version I also presented to the editor that some might appreciate…
View attachment 1790345
I don’t know. Portal at least does something that almost no one else was doing (perhaps the Echo Show, but I’m not sure if it has a camera or offers video calling). I don’t really see what Facebook’s watch would offer that isn’t already offered by the Apple Watch, Fitbit, any number of WearOS devices, any number of fitness enabled pseudo-smartwatches from legacy watch companies (like Tissot), or even third rate Chinese smartwatches in the sub $50 range. Smartwatches with fitness features are a dime a dozen these days (almost literally), and Facebook Messenger is available on WearOS and watchOS already. I don’t think most users want to use Facebook on a smartwatch (anyone who would be willing to endure that experience should probably be treated for Facebook addiction!). And WhatsApp isn’t available on watchOS, but that’s not due to any limitation with the Apple Watch. Keeping WhatsApp exclusive to a Facebook watch puts Facebook dangerously close to anticompetitive behavior that definitely wouldn’t sit well with the respective regulatory bodies of places where WhatsApp receives significant use.Well… The Portal is a really cool device with one big asterisk… Facebook. I’m sure this could be cool too, but it’d share that asterisk and make it a no-buy. Too bad, really.
Eh the old hypocrisy argument, not buying it this time. There’s a difference between using Gmail (which I admit I do) or Oculus goggles (which I don’t, but irrelevant) and letting the Mark Zuckerberg data empire access cameras worn on your wrist. The ramifications for not just your own privacy and security but any random person near you when you wear that thing are what should be under consideration.Kind of funny how we've got 100 comments all saying the same thing about how horrible Facebook is, but we all know that half of them are from hypocrites that use Google products.
Most of the rest use DuckDuckGo and then there's other random search engines the rest use.
Anyways... it seems to me that this device is supposed to kind of be a smart-everything, not just a smartwatch or a smartphone. It's supposed to be attached to accessories to give the smart-form-factor you want at whatever time of day. The concept is intriguing. I could be persuaded to buy it, but I probably won't... I find it unlikely that it'll really do much of anything better than my iPhone and/or Apple Watch, or that it'll really have game changing features.
I think Neuralink is going to be the next (last?) tech frontier... that'll change everything.
Congrats. I hope macrumors pays you well. You’re hilarious.In this case, they're exactly the same.
yea I love my Oculus as well. Im not saying I like FB or will ever get rid of my watch, I just think majority are on it lolI not only own an Oculus Quest 2, but I LOVE it! I don't want them stealing my data for free, but when they're offering up VR, I'm willing to give a little. So I'll climb off my high horse before I end up falling and breaking a leg. Beside, the obvious answers have already been given in spades.
I'll just say, a detachable watch face, from ANY company, is something that gives me pause and I'd like to see it in action first.
Also, I think it would take something game changing to pry my Apple Watch off my arm. It's my least favorite Apple device, but when I had to go without it for a few months, it was missed WAY more than I expected.
Indeed. If there would be any government regulation ove seek products, I'd ask for camera blocker on those camera's can any wearer of that rear me ! -Hard pass. For eternity.