Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, I agree somewhat.

In the end, they edit the photos anyways. The video doesn't really live up to what it says.
imo.
no hate'n.

i love how he says olympus in the beginning. :D haha.

[nikon beginner photographer; photoshop user for about, 4 years.]
 
As a serious amateur photographer... I totally agree that too many photographers focus on tech specs instead of thinking about creating compelling images.

Photography is ART. Art has nothing to do with megapixels. It's about conveying emotions and inspiring your viewers.

It's not that better technology has no role... just as with better canvas or paints for a painter... every piece of technology can be utilized by a good professional. It's just that the technology is certainly secondary to good artistic vision and excellent field skills. Only after you are truly a master of your craft does the technology start to make a (significant) difference.

Every time I see a soccer mom walking around with a huge DSLR with a stock lens on it and it set to Auto... I want to find out what salesman at Best Buy told her that was a good idea and kick him right in the nuts!

One thing I regularly tell people that are interested in my camera gear is: DONT BUY A DSLR UNLESS YOU WANT TO DO PHOTOGRAPHY AS AN ART FORM. A really good point and shoot will produce better pictures on Auto than a DSLR. And just as with this story, if you give a point and shoot to someone with good creative vision and is a master of their craft they can create spectacular photographs.

Anyway... this isn't going anywhere. If you want to get into photography... just start learning about how to take compelling pictures... even if all you have at your disposal is an iPhone...

Not entirely true. I recommend the entry level DSLR to friends who complain the point-n-shoots are too slow. If you have little kids the speed and FPS of the DSLR is a must. So, kit lens + full Auto isn't all that bad if you bought the camera for its response time and FPS only. Don't get too angry at the soccer MILFs :)
 
the best camera

The best camera is the one that is most useful to you at the time you take a picture.

I used to carry an iphone 3G and a Canon P&S as day to day cameras. I took better shots with the Canon, because it was more versatile, exposure & ISO range, zoom lens, aperture range. But that came all to naught because the condition of NiMH batteries on the Canon (even with spares) deteriorated far more quickly than the Lithium battery on the phone. It turned out often that the camera I could rely on was the phone because it was the only one that had a charge when I needed it – to capture a particular moment.

I have since changed to a P&S with lithium batteries.

Moral of the story, you need a lens and a light sensitive medium to take photo. How good that photo is, is up to the photographer or chance.
 
Well a recent fashion photo shoot conducted by fashion photographer Lee Morris using only an iPhone 3GS for the camera work.
 
I like fashion photography very much, and these shots are really great! I'm impressed by the fact they have been made just with the iPhone. Of course I realize that there has been a lot of post-production, but actually who cares? The fact is, iPhone can sometimes stand in for the professional camera, though of course it will never be able to replace it.
 
Just shows you how much of a sham business photography is. Like high priced art its all in your head and makes full use of the herd mentality.
 
Anyone that knows about two words about photography would tell you that the camera in 3GS is just pure crap.
Of course, if you take the pictures under the best possible conditions of light, movement of the target and the phone, then professionally retouch them in photoshop and show them at the appropriate size (3 MP is still 3MP), you get a good result.
Of course a real professional, like the guy in the video when he actually tries to make business, would NEVER use something like that. Saying that technology does not matter is plain stupid. Remember we come from analogical devices that shoot pictures at a much higher resolution than 3 MP and technology has been trying to catch up to that for a number of years. It's not that we are improving the quality a lot, it's that we are making it more convenient for professional work.
Remember resolution is not everything. How about light sensitivity? How about color realism?.
On top of that, you have to know how to use the technology to make a good picture, and that is what distinguishes a real professional from an amateur. You might be the best pilot in the world, but you don't go into the NASCAR with a 100 hp Honda, do you?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.