Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, you could always try corn whiskey. Some people claim the unaged corn whiskies tastes similar to tequila. (Personally, I like the aged variety.)

Either can be used to make an interesting Margarita, however. ;)

maybe you would like this one;

Hudson-New-York-Corn-for-products-page.jpg


an excellent small distillery, I like their rye whiskey quite too much
 
maybe you would like this one;

Image

an excellent small distillery, I like their rye whiskey quite too much

I just read a review for it that made it sound wonderful. I'm going to add this to my list of excuses for making a trip to NY. ;)

Some of the local micro-distilleries here produce a less-sweeter variety of corn whiskey that are quite decent. Some make a product that remind me the cough medicine a local doctor used to make in one of his back rooms. :D
 
Ok, I purchased a half pint of Jim Beam Black and have been sipping it. It's reported to be a mid priced "award winning" double aged whiskey that sells for about $32 a liter. Keep in mind, I am a whiskey novice.

The JBB has a nice sweet caramel flavor, but I notice at the end of a sip and swallow, a sensation and taste of how I imagine varsol or turpentine might taste. Is this a quality of whiskey, that has to gotten used to or can a bump up in quality move towards smooth and eliminate the solvent taste and sensation?

Looking for some recommendations for sweet, smooth, flavorful sipping whiskey. I drink it straight and keep it in the freezer. Is this a mistake?

I found this page: Find the Best Whiskey and selected American and came up with several pages of interesting looking names. price ran from $40-$150 a bottle. Some aged for 15 years. If anyone is wondering, I'm choosing domestic bourbon brands hopefully to achieve the best pricing.
Thanks! :)

Jim%20Beam%20Black%20bottle%20shot.jpg
 
Last edited:
I'm drinking Macallan 17 Fine Oak. I used to drink Macallan 18, but it seems that it is no longer sold in the US.

The Macallan 17 fine Oak is a delightful single malt scotch.

(I also enjoy absinthe...but that ain't whiskey!)

Image

Well, I rather like absinthe, too, (I believe that I may have mentioned this fact somewhere or sometime in some post or other…..)…..

The Macallan 17 fine Oak looks lovely; is it as smooth as its venerable vintage might suggest?

One night recently, in our dodgy little dive, I came across an elegantly smooth 18 year old single distillery whisky in an impressive squat bottle, colour almost black, which I must investigate further. Not least to confirm how to spell the strange Scottish word with which it identifies itself…..

However, a colleague returned from a brief break with a bottle of (a one litre bottle of) Johnnie Walker Blue Label for me last week. I have refused to open it (a mere matter of principle) until I had reimbursed the generous soul who transported it across oceans and continents so that it could be surrendered into my tender care…..

For now, it sits in my cupboard, along with a bottle of XO Hennessy (cognac) and a good many bottles of extremely good Italian wine.

Other shelves play host to coffee from Intelligentsia (Honey Badger, no less, along with some of their standard Black Cat espresso) and Illy, along with robust & rugged leather coasters, (from Saddleback, thank you, Shrink), porcelain mugs, many books, a Bialetti French press, more books, wine and beer glasses, cans of beer (Stella, Jupiler, Budvar),…… the word well-stocked comes to mind…..

Aged cheeses from the Netherlands and some others from Italy are in my fridge…..and tins and tins of olives…...
 
Last edited:
Well, I rather like absinthe, too, (I believe that I may have mentioned this fact somewhere or sometime in some post or other…..)…..

The Macallan 17 fine Oak looks lovely; is it as smooth as its venerable vintage might suggest?


The Macallan 17 is really a delight. Not as much peat flavor as Lagavulin, for example (another of my favorites), somewhat sweet, spicy, unbelievably smooth...really a wonderful drink.

And as was mentioned above, I was wrong about the unavailability of Macallan 18 (truly ambrosia) in the US. It is available here, and I may have found a web site within Mass that will ship it, as alcoholic beverages cannot be shipped across the border from out of state. It is, however, just a bit pricey at about $200 for a standard bottle (750 ml).
 
Well, I rather like absinthe, too, (I believe that I may have mentioned this fact somewhere or sometime in some post or other…..)…..

The Macallan 17 fine Oak looks lovely; is it as smooth as its venerable vintage might suggest?

One night recently, in our dodgy little dive, I came across an elegantly smooth 18 year old single distillery whisky in an impressive squat bottle, colour almost black, which I must investigate further. Not least to confirm how to spell the strange Scottish word with which it identifies itself…..

However, a colleague returned from a brief break with a bottle of (a one litre bottle of) Johnnie Walker Blue Label for me last week. I have refused to open it (a mere matter of principle) until I had reimbursed the generous soul who transported it across oceans and continents so that it could be surrendered into my tender care…..

For now, it sits in my cupboard, along with a bottle of XO Hennessy (cognac) and a good many bottles of extremely good Italian wine.

Other shelves play host to coffee from Intelligentsia (Honey Badger, no less, along with some of their standard Black Cat espresso) and Illy, along with robust & rugged leather coasters, (from Saddleback, thank you, Shrink), porcelain mugs, many books, a Bialetti French press, more books, wine and beer glasses, cans of beer (Stella, Jupiler, Budvar),…… the word well-stocked comes to mind…..

Aged cheeses from the Netherlands and some others from Italy are in my fridge…..and tins and tins of olives…...

My favorite whisky to date is the Talisker 18. I do very much recommend it, and it happens to cost quite a bit less than the delightful Mcallen 18. The Laphroaig 18 is also divine, although Laphroaig is not for the faint of heart. It packs some serious peat and iodine.

Either is excellent, but for the moment Talisker would be my top choice...exquisite balance.
 
I read an article (no link) which said that "wheated" whiskey (versus rye) was the smoothest and recommended Makers Mark. Thoughts? Thanks!
 
I read an article (no link) which said that "wheated" whiskey (versus rye) was the smoothest and recommended Makers Mark. Thoughts? Thanks!

first you gotta get past the turpentine taste! LOL

I suppose there are those that think of bourbon as a somewhat medicinal flavored booze drunk in the south so maybe the turpentine flavor you mention is something associated with the corn mash?

Have you tried other types of whiskey to see if bourbon is the flavor you'd prefer? You might try some taste testing......go to a liquor store where you can acquire a number of those small bottles (airlines serving size) of different types and brands.....and give them a sample (not all at once of course or you won't remember a thing about the different flavors)

Myself, I'm not much given to bourbons unless they're mixed with something and there's a party going on
 
I read an article (no link) which said that "wheated" whiskey (versus rye) was the smoothest and recommended Makers Mark. Thoughts? Thanks!

"Wheated"? Makers Mark has a bourbon that's made, in part, from wheat, but it's not considered a true "wheat whiskey" in the U.S. market, because it's not made primarily from a wheat mash. But then they may be marketing a true wheat whiskey now(?) (I don't know.)

Mass produced aged wheat whiskies seem rather uncommon in the U.S. Most seem to come from micro-distilleries.
 
My favorite whisky to date is the Talisker 18. I do very much recommend it, and it happens to cost quite a bit less than the delightful Mcallen 18. The Laphroaig 18 is also divine, although Laphroaig is not for the faint of heart. It packs some serious peat and iodine.

Either is excellent, but for the moment Talisker would be my top choice...exquisite balance.

After Macallan 18 and Lagavulin (16 year old), I also enjoy the Talasker that you mentioned. Also, occasionally, Dalwhinney is very nice, imo.:D
 
My favorite whisky to date is the Talisker 18. I do very much recommend it, and it happens to cost quite a bit less than the delightful Mcallen 18. The Laphroaig 18 is also divine, although Laphroaig is not for the faint of heart. It packs some serious peat and iodine.

Either is excellent, but for the moment Talisker would be my top choice...exquisite balance.

After Macallan 18 and Lagavulin (16 year old), I also enjoy the Talasker that you mentioned. Also, occasionally, Dalwhinney is very nice, imo.:D

if you like the Talisker 18 then perhaps you'd like Highland Park 18?
 
I've been having the different Macallan's of late, but now that I've read this thread I wanna try the Talisker 18 and Highland Park 18.
 
first you gotta get past the turpentine taste! LOL

I suppose there are those that think of bourbon as a somewhat medicinal flavored booze drunk in the south so maybe the turpentine flavor you mention is something associated with the corn mash?

Have you tried other types of whiskey to see if bourbon is the flavor you'd prefer? You might try some taste testing......go to a liquor store where you can acquire a number of those small bottles (airlines serving size) of different types and brands.....and give them a sample (not all at once of course or you won't remember a thing about the different flavors)

Myself, I'm not much given to bourbons unless they're mixed with something and there's a party going on

I'm exploring different tastes now. I'll see if the local liquor store has the small bottles. I've read several articles that describes a "finish". This is when I notice the medicinal taste most. It could be the whiskey Jim Beam Black and maybe I need to try a better whiskey? The basic flavor of the JBB is good until the finish. If that medicinal flavor is a character of all whiskeys then I won't become a whiskey drinker and specifically why I'm inquiring about smooth whiskeys. :)

"Wheated"? Makers Mark has a bourbon that's made, in part, from wheat, but it's not considered a true "wheat whiskey" in the U.S. market, because it's not made primarily from a wheat mash. But then they may be marketing a true wheat whiskey now(?) (I don't know.)

Mass produced aged wheat whiskies seem rather uncommon in the U.S. Most seem to come from micro-distilleries.

Please reference Burbon Guide and see the section on "high rye" vs "wheater", where in the 2 example either rye or wheat is added to the corn mash...which I believe is separate from a true wheat whiskey. If confusion, it was probably the way I stated it. :)
 
I'm exploring different tastes now. I'll see if the local liquor store has the small bottles. I've read several articles that describes a "finish". This is when I notice the medicinal taste most. It could be the whiskey Jim Beam Black and maybe I need to try a better whiskey? The basic flavor of the JBB is good until the finish. If that medicinal flavor is a character of all whiskeys then I won't become a whiskey drinker and specifically why I'm inquiring about smooth whiskeys. :)

In general, the more corn, the sweeter it tastes. I hardly notice the sweetness, but then I was raised on hot toddies. :)

Please reference Burbon Guide and see the section on "high rye" vs "wheater", where in the 2 example either rye or wheat is added to the corn mash...which I believe is separate from a true wheat whiskey. If confusion, it was probably the way I stated it. :)

That page is interesting. I was referring to the narmes/terms for the classes/types of whisky the U.S. government uses however. Don't think "wheater" is on the list. ;)
 
Last edited:
My tour through the 18's is slow due to rather strong objections from my wallet, but I'll put the Highland Park on my short list.

While I understand the sane objections from cowering wallets, these are whiskies to be sipped and savoured (rather like an aged cognac) rather than swallowed in haste. Perhaps even sipped and savoured on special occasions….

This, in turn, in an ideal world, means that one can expect to have the bottle for some time……….

 
While I understand the sane objections from cowering wallets, these are whiskies to be sipped and savoured (rather like an aged cognac) rather than swallowed in haste. Perhaps even sipped and savoured on special occasions….

This, in turn, in an ideal world, means that one can expect to have the bottle for some time……….


Quite right, I seem to recall having the other bottles for over a year.
 
Gouden Carolus Single Malt ftw. (Local Belgian whiskey)

That sounds rather good, actually. What are your impressions?

Over the past few weeks, I have also made the acquaintance of Bunnahabhain 18 year old single malt Scotch (whisky) - which comes in a strangely unsettling, squat, black, bottle…..

Sublime…..and smooth...
 
Exactly; these are not whiskies to be proffered lightly, but ought to be reserved for special people (your good self), special occasions, and perhaps, special friends or close family………not, in other words, everyday quaffing…..

I'd like to point out that there's NOTHING wrong with these being used for everyday quaffing
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.