Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

FBI Insists Apple Cooperate Despite Resetting iCloud Password on Shooter's iPhone

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
66,055
34,896



iPhone-Passcode.jpg
The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation has confirmed that it worked with San Bernardino County government officials to reset the iCloud account password on an iPhone belonging to suspected terrorist Syed Farook, according to a press statement obtained by Re/code.

Apple told reporters on Friday that the Apple ID password associated with Farook's iPhone was changed "less than 24 hours" after being in government hands. Had the password not been altered, Apple believes the backup information the government is asking for could have been accessible to Apple engineers.

Nevertheless, the FBI insists that the iCloud password reset does not impact Apple's ability to comply with a court order demanding it create a modified iOS version that allows authorities to unlock the shooter's iPhone 5c by way of a brute-force attack.

The FBI further stated that "direct data extraction from an iOS device often provides more data than an iCloud backup contains," and said investigators may be able to extract more evidence from the shooter's iPhone with Apple's assistance. Tim Cook and company, however, have thus far refused to cooperate.
Even if the password had not been changed and Apple could have turned on the auto-backup and loaded it to the cloud, there might be information on the phone that would not be accessible without Apple's assistance as required by the All Writs Act order, since the iCloud backup does not contain everything on an iPhone. As the government's pleadings state, the government's objective was, and still is, to extract as much evidence as possible from the phone.
Click to expand...
Cook shared an open letter on Wednesday stating that while Apple is "shocked and outraged" by the San Bernardino attacks last December, and presumes "the FBI's intentions are good," the company strongly believes that building a "backdoor" for U.S. government officials would be "too dangerous to create."

The White House later denied that the FBI is asking Apple to "create a new backdoor to its products," but rather seeking access to a single iPhone. On Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice called Apple's opposition a "marketing strategy" in a motion filed to compel Apple to comply with the original court order.

The dispute between Apple and the FBI has ignited a widespread debate over the past six days. Google, Facebook, and Twitter have publicly backed Apple, and some campaigners have rallied to support the company, while U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump and some San Bernardino victims have sided with the FBI.

Apple now has until February 26 to file its first legal arguments against the court order.

Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: FBI Insists Apple Cooperate Despite Resetting iCloud Password on Shooter's iPhone
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2016/02/22/fbi-vs-apple-icloud-password-reset/
"No, but we really, REALLY want you to compromise the security of all your devices to satisfy this one whim. Just this one timeeee... We promiseee."

In spite of my disagreement with this guy on a lot of issues, Tim has been absolutely heroic in this issue of privacy. Just fantastic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LastName, TropN, iChrist and 39 others
So is Apple sitting hard on the key, or is there simply no key? The former would indicate Apple is, as accused, using this as an opportunity to generate warm fuzzies from its customers. The latter would be more palatable, to me anyway.

As a megacorp, I've always found it rather unbelievable that Apple doesn't have the ability to crack it's own keys. But if they won't decrypt this phone because they genuinely can't, wouldn't that be a better argument to the Feds?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamesPDX
Providing backdoor to FBI by Apple could cripple the whole iPhone business around the globe, including various European countries and China. There is no need to mention China is always keeping an eye on what Apple is doing.

I also don't agree we need to lose privacy in order to subdue a single killer. There should be workarounds to force shooter leaking passcode, rather than ordering Apple to do so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hevelius, Benjamin Frost, vmistery and 2 others
"Even if the password had not been changed and Apple could have turned on the auto-backup and loaded it to the cloud, there might be information on the phone that would not be accessible without Apple's assistance as required by the All Writs Act order..."
Using weasel words such as "might be" really weakens any government arguments for help from Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LastName, jbachandouris, JackRoch and 7 others
mcdj said:
As a megacorp, I've always found it rather unbelievable that Apple doesn't have the ability to crack it's own keys.
Click to expand...

The best kind of security is one you can show every aspect (code, mathematical theory, etc.) to everyone, friends and enemies, and everyone agrees, they can't break it. This is why Open Source is so powerful in the area of security: there is no false sense of security through obscurity.

Apple can't break the encryption because they didn't make the encryption. They specifically picked one they can't break. The FBI knows this. They aren't asking Apple to crack encryption. They are asking for a way to circumvent the secure enclave chip that will wipe the phone after 10 failed attempts at guessing the code. There's only 1 million codes to try, if they could try them one every 2 seconds, worst possible case, they would have the code in 23 days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gasu E., centauratlas, vmistery and 6 others
I'm sure Apple already has a backdoor version of iPhone made... like they did for PowerPC and Intel... "just in case scenario"
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamesPDX
I love how the FBI now "has confirmed that it worked with San Bernardino County government officials to reset the iCloud account password" after the County defended itself by tweeting that FBI actually told them to do it.

The FBI made it look like the County were a bunch of buffoons and reset the password.
The County tweeted that the FBI told them to do it.
Now the FBI implies, "ok, it was joint effort"

Just sounds like the FBI is trying to cover up any wrong doing or mistakes by blaming others (throwing anyone under bus even if they try to help)

.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankeeD, gadgetguy03, Snide and 9 others
Morod said:
"Even if the password had not been changed and Apple could have turned on the auto-backup and loaded it to the cloud, there might be information on the phone that would not be accessible without Apple's assistance as required by the All Writs Act order..."
Using weasel words such as "might be" really weakens any government arguments for help from Apple.
Click to expand...

For the FBI, "might be" and "we believe" has come to replace "evidence indicates" and "we have been informed that". They have stopped seeking real facts and just make stuff up. They are smarter than we are, you know...

Dale
 
  • Like
Reactions: LastName, centauratlas and jjm3
paul4339 said:
I love how the FBI now "has confirmed that it worked with San Bernardino County government officials to reset the iCloud account password" after the County defended itself by tweeting that FBI actually told them to do it.

The FBI made it look like the County were a bunch of buffoons and reset the password.
The County tweeted that the FBI told them to do it.
Now the FBI implies, "ok, it was joint effort"

Just sounds like the FBI is trying to cover up any wrong doing or mistakes by blaming others (throwing anyone under bus even if they try to help)
Click to expand...
That's why they're called "Special" agents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LastName, Snide, FriendlyMackle and 1 other person
mcdj said:
So is Apple sitting hard on the key, or is there simply no key? The former would indicate Apple is, as accused, using this as an opportunity to generate warm fuzzies from its customers. The latter would be more palatable, to me anyway.

As a megacorp, I've always found it rather unbelievable that Apple doesn't have the ability to crack it's own keys. But if they won't decrypt this phone because they genuinely can't, wouldn't that be a better argument to the Feds?
Click to expand...
They don't have a key. What the FBI wants Apple to do is to write a custom version of iOS that ignores some of the security features and makes a brute force attack feasible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TropN, FrankeeD, gadgetguy03 and 7 others
This is nothing else but a shocking example of brute force, state controlled momentum to establish a precedent of access.

I have never heard of such a mercenary state nation like the U.S (posing to be free and democratic), since the time of the British Empire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankeeD, vmistery, BvizioN and 3 others
They could DFU update to a "newer" version that could disable the passcode security features.

mariusignorello said:
What kills me is the fact that if Apple chose to rewrite iOS, this device in question would need to be updated or restored, therefore possibly destroying evidence. After all, they can't back up and restore the device because the password is different now. FBI just might be screwed in this case.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: TropN
With all these mess ups, even the ones who originally stood by the FBI must be having second thoughts by now.

I know I would.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back