Nice idea but it self selects, the people with the worst service and circumstances probably aren't downloading FCC apps
Because democracy produces great governance?I feel like this is a good cause by a not so great agency.
A governing body of its type should be chosen by the people.
If they made an iOS app, isn't making an M1 app almost no work at all?Odd how the developer made it available for M1 Macs but no other models.
Wasn’t this what Net Neutrality did/was supposed to do? (Not to get political on whether you think it was a good or bad idea).I see this as laying the groundwork for broadband as a utility. They need to see what true speeds are around the country and if telcoms are being truthful.
So more like school boards and less like courts?I feel like this is a good cause by a not so great agency.
A governing body of its type should be chosen by the people.
The app isn't just available for iOS.I downloaded this and it was spamware. Moreoever, it was obviously spamware. Why would the FCC only release a tool like this on iOS? MacRumors, you should delete this posting.
By default, the Application is configured to use no more than 100 megabytes (MB) of data each month for automated testing. Any additional tests you initiate will also consume between 100 kilobytes (kB) for the smallest packet loss test and 40MB for a complete suite of tests. At any time, you can change the amount of data the Application uses by increasing or reducing the “monthly data cap” in the settings menu.
I'm just wondering. What'll stop the internet providers from kicking you into the fastlane whenever they detect a connection to an FCC server?
FCC: Apparently everyone in the US has 1 gigabit up and down.
Installing a Google app on your smartphone - what a GREAT idea. </sarcasm>Installing a Federally-produced app on your smartphone -- what a GREAT idea. </sarcasm>
Or from any popular site that logs such data, like Netflix or Youtube. Indeed, I bet the FCC has the power to compel the ISPs to log and provide this data anyway. Seems really odd to release a janky app like this.Or FCC could just consider buying data from Speedtest or whoever the market leaders are.
Not necessarily, but at least there's a modicum of accountability.Because democracy produces great governance?
The carriers provide "best case scenario" data which does not align with reality. And in some cases they don't even know what connections they actually have available in a given location. Here's a fun little romp by way of example: https://arstechnica.com/information...months-without-internet-despite-5000-payment/Can't they just use their regulatory powers to glean the data from the carriers directly?
It's worth a shot to crowd source it, but they'd probably get more valid results grant funding a university to do a study.Already covered, but 1) this doesn't need to be an app, and 2) just buy that data.
Waste of FCC money.
Potentially but can go both ways. People with bad service may be more likely to download it in order to show the FCC how bad their service, in hopes it helps get them to push for better speeds.Nice idea but it self selects, the people with the worst service and circumstances probably aren't downloading FCC apps