Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'd like to see Apple, Google, and Microsoft getting behind the effort for better broadband more aggressively. Are they even doing anything? It's the backbone of their business and directly determines the experience of their products. I guess Google kinda tried....
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
the developer of this app is "SamKnows"...lol no thank you

SamKnows is reputable. They are a third-party organization that has been operating for years to test broadband speed claims. I have a SamKnows "whitebox", a wireless router that has been modified to remove its wifi capabilities and instead run automatic, periodic speed, jitter, ping, and packet loss tests. I've been operating it for almost six years and it helped me to identify a cable degradation issue at my old house.

[Edit]
It might also put your mind at ease to know that SamKnows is an organization headquartered in the UK and is not connected to the US government (i.e. "Uncle Sam"). The name originates from Sam Crawford, the developer who began the company. https://www.samknows.com/company/history
[/Edit]
 
Last edited:
I’ve heard for best results, the user should be vaccinated and keep their arm close to the smartphone. I’m not sure why...

PS I’m joking folks, get yourself vaccinated!! 😃
Unfortunately my phone is XR so totally missing out on the 5G advantage!
 
It’s kind of useless to make this an app for a smartphone if the purpose is to measure wired connections. A smartphone will always be on WiFi (or cellular) and never wired. Yet, many WiFi setups are very much lacking and don’t cause speed issues for the user that have nothing to do with the provider.
 
Those results aren't accurate, as ISPs pay SpeedTest for favorable results.
Or conspiracy theories aside, they run their own speed test servers. Why would I as an ISP trust results from a server with unknown resources for the speed test server. I get 100% of the advertised speed of my ISP, largely independent of which server I run the test against.
 
It takes no effort to update to say “we don’t collect any” if they truly don’t.
 

Attachments

  • 60981576-0A7E-4E35-8CFD-5F6BEEF4984B.jpeg
    60981576-0A7E-4E35-8CFD-5F6BEEF4984B.jpeg
    315.8 KB · Views: 75
Because you downloaded the wrong one. When you search for FCC speedtest, the first app that appears is Speedtest master. That's not it.
No. He's not wrong. The FCC Speed Test app is garbage. It's 4 years old and last updated 4 months ago... boy developer SamKnows...

So the FCC bought some guys product and put their name on it and it's got issues... European date format and the data charts post a day in the past...

Maybe there's an update that will be released? (Hope they didn't pay this guy too much money.)
 
Agreed. But Speedtest uses a mix of hosts which can yield to much variation. I have tried such.
Speedtest data is pretty useless since Comcast and others host a server in each market. I don't care how fast my cable or fiber internet is to the office downtown. Without solid network peering I still can't get anything at a good rate. Right now I have gig with Centurylink, but it's been getting slower month over month as they bring on more customers. Their network is garbage even if my uplink to their CO downtown is great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
No. He's not wrong. The FCC Speed Test app is garbage. It's 4 years old and last updated 4 months ago... boy developer SamKnows...

So the FCC bought some guys product and put their name on it and it's got issues... European date format and the data charts post a day in the past...

Maybe there's an update that will be released? (Hope they didn't pay this guy too much money.)
Probably should have put a fresh coat of paint on it before the national press release.
 
Those results aren't accurate, as ISPs pay SpeedTest for favorable results.
How does an ISP go about paying for favorable speedtest results?

That is not an option. ISP's or anyone for that matter can host their own speedtest server. Speedtests vary between servers for multiple reasons. 1, the testing server could be overwhelmed or under sized for what its doing. 2, the server you are testing through could be on the other side of a congested link that your ISP has no control over and hence slow speeds to that server and not the closer one.
 
Only if sleepy Joe uses this service in his bungalow in Scranton PA
then i still would not use that or any other gov service.
 
Last edited:
Wonder how they remove WiFi issues from the result?
That was my thoughts too. People could have gigabit tier service but **** wireless in their house and the speedtests would reflect the crappy wireless and not their gigabit tier service.
 
For those interested, here's what the app will collect:

https://www.fcc.gov/general/mobile-broadband-performance-application-privacy-notice-and-terms-use

What I think is interesting is this section:



So from this, it seems like the app runs continuously on it own. That's a bit odd.

It doesn't run continuously on its own. You need to tell it to run when you want it to run. The app just keeps track of how much data it's used so it can give you a heads up before you run the test if you have used all of what you have allocated to the app.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jayducharme
I wonder what server they’re using... and where. I have gig service... and I registered at 131 mbps. Speedtest.net I hit 700 off my Wi-Fi. No differences other than the geographically selected server that I can visibly see...
Same here gig and I pull 600-800 wireless pulled 48 then 150 on their app
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.