LOL! Well, that's reassuring, isn't it? After those three years, the sky's the limit!T-Mobile and Sprint have also promised that they will not raise prices for three years following the completion of the merger.
LOL! Well, that's reassuring, isn't it? After those three years, the sky's the limit!T-Mobile and Sprint have also promised that they will not raise prices for three years following the completion of the merger.
The CDMA and GSM standards have already merged. LTE is the official upgrade path for both network systems.
Both Sprint and T-Mobile are already using LTE for the majority of their network infrastructure and will be decommissioning their remaining legacy CDMA and GSM systems soon so they can re-farm the spectrum for use in 5G
LOL! Well, that's reassuring, isn't it? After those three years, the sky's the limit!
All new CDMA phones are both CDMA and GSM/LTE capable.Not disagreeing (actually I had no idea that's how it worked), but if that's the case, aren't smartphones still being marketed as either CDMA (Verizon/Sprint) or GSM (ATT/TM) models?
This argument hasn't made sense to me. If Sprint failed their spectrum would go back to the US government who could relicense it to someone other than the existing big 3. This was an opportunity to send a message that usage of spectrum is a privilege not a right.
In fact, mergers should invalidate spectrum holding in their entirety. You can consolidate the brand and the hardware, but not the resources of the American people.
This argument hasn't made sense to me. If Sprint failed their spectrum would go back to the US government who could relicense it to someone other than the existing big 3.
All new CDMA phones are both CDMA and GSM/LTE capable.
Carrier specific models have been going away for a while now.
It's kind of funny how easily I can find the 1 or 3 percent coverage gaps (and not just from TMo), unless I'm just that lucky?Together, the two companies have committed to building out a nationwide 5G network covering 97 percent of the U.S. population within three years and 99 percent within six years. T-Mobile and Sprint have also promised that they will not raise prices for three years following the completion of the merger.
How would this merger work? Since Sprint is CDMA and TMobile is GSM? Would the "New TMobile" be both, or would current Sprint customers have to change to GSM phones?
I think you missed the sarcasm.Funny.
Except your sarcasm works against you... because landline telephone prices SKYROCKETED after they were broken up.
And also innovation was stifled by it, since all the things Bell Labs did and couldn't patent because they were unrelated to telephony could suddenly be patented. You know, things like UNIX, C, C++, Stereo Sound, Radio Astronomy, finding the evidence of the Big Bang itself, TDMA and CDMA, the transistor, the laser, solar cells, CCDs... you know, things we DEFINITELY don't rely on today and we DEFINITELY don't benefit from the free licenses on.
When T-Mo bought MetroPCS they were CDMA and they eventually converted everyone to a GSM handset as they sunset the CDMA networks.Like Verizon, CDMA is only used for sub-LTE communications. But more than likely, they'll have to keep the CDMA network running for a few years until a significant portion of its users have replaced their phones.
I'm hoping the merger will improve my T-Mobile coverage presuming there is a way to share the Sprint LTE towers between both T-Mobile and Sprint devices.
Hopefully it's not just one company running what is essentially two entirely separate networks.
So you’re okay just settling and just taking what’s in front of you instead of searching for other options that best fits your needs?I’m all for less competition
I'm a t-mo customer and really happy with their service. I'm skeptical of this merger though. Fewer companies always lead to higher prices. I'm keeping my grandfathered plan as long as possible.
I think you’re right on the money. With the merger, Verizon and AT&T finally have a viable threat.As of 3Q18 (the most recent data I could find in a quick search) Verizon had 35% of the US wireless carrier market, AT&T had 34%, T-mobile had 17% and Sprint had 12%. While I generally agree that mergers = less competition = bad for consumers, this case might be an exception. Because the 2 biggest players control nearly 70% of the market, T-mobile and Sprint individually are a distant 3rd and 4th place but combined they would be a close 3rd place. That might actually make them more of a competitor to the big 2.
T-Mobile's $195,000 expenses at the Trump International Hotel in Washington finally bearing fruit. 😉
That's what was reported 8 months ago. I wouldn't be surprised to learn more has been spent since then.Wow, if $195,000 (of which most very little is profit to the hotel and almost all would been spent at some other nearby hotel had they not stayed or done events there) is all it took to bribe the FCC’s commissioners into approving a merger of two companies who together will still be third (that is how small they are, even after combining, they are still third), it was money well spent.