It sounds like people should be tired of being ignorant and work on changing that more than anything else.
Customers shouldn't have to pass some legal bar to even understand the TOS.
It sounds like people should be tired of being ignorant and work on changing that more than anything else.
Not when it comes to even knowing there are TOS present to begin with and having some idea of what's there. Seems like even those basics are all too often missing.Customers shouldn't have to pass some legal bar to even understand the TOS.
Though the money part is funny around here.
People will grab their torches and pitchforks to support Apple charging a ridiculously high premium and get an unheard of profit margin per device. They'll brush off all the rumors of the Apple negotiating with the cell companies to increase the price of iPhone 6 by $100 (those cell companies are arguing on the customer's behalf by the way.) They'll ignore Apple $100 for a $11 dollar increase in flash memory and insisting the smallest device is still 16 MB.
But if a cell company does anything that somehow seems like they want an extra nickel, people write 11 pages of how evil cell phone companies are.
FCC not happy with Big Red's answers....and it doesn't surprise me one iota. Unlimited is unlimited. And yes, 47CFR27.16(c)(1) does apply.
http://thehill.com/policy/technology/214698-fcc-chief-frowns-on-verizons-slowing-speeds
It seems like it's still under question if it applies or exactly how, otherwise (if it did apply and they knew how) they would have already gone after Verizon using it instead of asking questions and then just not being happy with the answers.FCC not happy with Big Red's answers....and it doesn't surprise me one iota. Unlimited is unlimited. And yes, 47CFR27.16(c)(1) does apply.
http://thehill.com/policy/technology/214698-fcc-chief-frowns-on-verizons-slowing-speeds
It sounds like people should be tired of being ignorant and work on changing that more than anything else.