Yes, according to the OP logic. The new food should arrive the exact same time as well. It is the restaurant's responsibility to know when delivery drivers are hungry and should double up on food orders to cover this.
And Apple is sending him a new one. Case closed.
If that is the case then the mods need to close this thread
Don’t blame Apple, blame FedEx. Yeah it sucks that you’re getting your computer so late, but shift your blame correctly.
Bingo. Like lmao close the thread this person getting a new replacement end of story.
It doesn’t matter. Where do you think the stock from local stores comes from? No matter where you buy the product, it comes from China. So your logic is flawed. A MacBook that is bought in store has the same probability of it getting lost or damaged.
But I dare say if you complain to the restaurant about your order, they would at least expedite another order for you regardless of how many orders are front of the OP’s order. Don’t tell me you expect your dinner for today to be delivered a week from now and you are ok with it?
..but it had nothing to do with the restaurant? in this example, the third party courier, DoorDash, would be responsible.
There is a reason why we can’t file a complain to FedEx or any courier if we are not the person/company selling/shipping the product?
the courier is not responsible to the customer, they are responsible to the people that hire them, the restaurant, hence the restaurant is responsible. It is the resturants sole responsibility to make sure that the people/company they hire are trustworthy.
Yes, exactly. The restaurant and the delivery service have a contractual relationship. If there's a delivery issue, it's for them to work out. It's not between the end customer and the delivery service to work out the issue.
Then you have never used Uber Eats, DoorDash, etc or any other similar service. You can only submit issues or obtain support through them, and the restaurant will also tell you that if you call them.
That happens because people do not exercise their consumer rights. Granted it depends on which country you are in BUT in general, if you use a delivery service such as Uber Eats or Deliveroo or one of the others, the same sale of contract applies, which is customer to resturant/fast food place. Again, depending on which country you live in, if the resturant/ fast food place told it's customer to contact the courier they are then breaking consumer law because when you purchase food or any item online or over the phone, the sale of contract is with you and the restaurant, not with the courier. Just because Uber and the restaurants behave the way they do does not mean it's right, it's just that not enough people complain to their local authourity that Uber and the resturants are not behaving within the law.
because you straight out said that packages in international shipping is terrible? when in fact all products you buy has to go through the same international shipping?
Thanks for the advice! Appreciate the empathy as well.
This isn't germane. Apples to oranges. A $2,000 computer is not a $30 meal.
Thank you! Sadly, none of this happened. Apple did nothing in this case...
This would make sense if it were shipping today, but it's not. So they are not fulfilling the order I placed, but instead placing a new one. I already waited a month and paid them for this computer.
Again, this is not germane. 1 day early =/= 3 weeks late. This is the difference between going above and beyond on a promise, and breaking one. Do you see how these two things are not the same?
This is, again, categorically false. Apple charged me and is not honoring my place in line. If Apple shipped me the computer of the person behind me, then they would not have to wait 3 weeks. They would get their computer next, so on and so forth, in sequential order. The only thing I am entitled to, is to receive the computer that I have already paid for. Folks whose machines have not yet shipped, have not paid for them.
Thanks for the advice! Appreciate the empathy as well.
This isn't germane. Apples to oranges. A $2,000 computer is not a $30 meal.
But no, I hold DoorDash accountable because they took my money and I ordered through their app. I didn't order this MBP from FedEx. Apple already charged me for this item and is delivering it a full month late.
Thank you! Sadly, none of this happened. Apple did nothing in this case...
–I had to contact FedEx to learn the order was missing
–I had to then contact Apple to let them know
–I had to ask Apple to process a replacement on my behalf
–Apple basically placed a new order for me after I had already paid for an item (charged at the time of shipment) that will now not arrive for another month.
Apple is very literally not doing anything in this case beyond fulfilling their original obligation 3 weeks late, charging me a month in advance and allowing my trade-in value to expire.
This would make sense if it were shipping today, but it's not. So they are not fulfilling the order I placed, but instead placing a new one. I already waited a month and paid them for this computer.
Again, this is not germane. 1 day early =/= 3 weeks late. This is the difference between going above and beyond on a promise, and breaking one. Do you see how these two things are not the same?
This is, again, categorically false. Apple charged me and is not honoring my place in line. If Apple shipped me the computer of the person behind me, then they would not have to wait 3 weeks. They would get their computer next, so on and so forth, in sequential order. The only thing I am entitled to, is to receive the computer that I have already paid for. Folks whose machines have not yet shipped, have not paid for them.
People are not understanding that the only people who have to wait this long for the MBP I ordered, are those who order it today, 11/18. I placed my order 1 month ago, on 10/19. It is not the same.
No. I also don't expect to be responsible for the logistics of Apple getting their customers their orders on time (which in this case they have failed to do).
