Palm handhelds had no file system. All data were tied to the applications and the user had no way to directly access them. File transfer was only possible through the Palm desktop sync.
I loved my Paln Zire but hated the limited file system. Most people I know stopped using the Palm because of the lack of a filesystem. Without a filesystem it was simply a overpriced calendar.
Eventually there was a third party file system and then Palm released their update with a file system. However at that point it was too late because too many programs were not using it because they were developed for the "non-file-sytem" and the potential of the Palm was never realized.
Then Palm went down the drain.....
Apple is in a much better situation than Palm of course. But this example clearly shows that there is a broad need and desire of users to organize and control their data the way they want. I think it is a mistake that Apple does not support an open file system.
I loved my Paln Zire but hated the limited file system. Most people I know stopped using the Palm because of the lack of a filesystem. Without a filesystem it was simply a overpriced calendar.
Eventually there was a third party file system and then Palm released their update with a file system. However at that point it was too late because too many programs were not using it because they were developed for the "non-file-sytem" and the potential of the Palm was never realized.
Then Palm went down the drain.....
Apple is in a much better situation than Palm of course. But this example clearly shows that there is a broad need and desire of users to organize and control their data the way they want. I think it is a mistake that Apple does not support an open file system.