Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wait, so you want to track your friends without contacting them first to ask them?

Uh, yeah. That's never going to happen.

I use Find My Friends all the time, but I talked with each and every person on my list about it, obviously.

No...make it integrated to iOS so I don't have to wait for my friends to download the app. Some may not WANT to download it as they think it takes up space.

Obviously if I want my friends location, I would have to send a request and the friend must accept the request JUST LIKE what the current app does.
 
I would certainly ask my children for their permission. Not sure where you got this impression form. Nothing I wrote sounds like this.
I got it from the person who said parents use FMF on a daily basis and that he required his children to have it installed.

Asking my child to do something = A judge imposing a sentence on a criminal

Uh...yeah. Those are not even close to being the same thing.
So GPS-tracking and phone calls are identical in terms of surveillance in one case, but not the other?

----------

Again, nothing mentioned on my part about going out of your way to do something--in fact the opposite, using what's already available to you that isn't more disruptive than useful, even if it's not 100% useful for everything all the time. That's what retinal parents understand pretty much inherently.

Arguing that tracking your kids with GPS is okay when it's readily available but not when you have to purchase a device specifically made for it is very strange though. So parents with kids who have smartphones are irrational if they don't track their kids on a daily basis, whilst parents with kids who don't can skip it because all the safety arguments and so on somehow wouldn't apply to them?

What's retinal parents? As you've probably guessed, English isn't my mother tongue.

----------

You keep trying to push your "if it didn't exist" scenario too much to take seriously.

It is there on the phone that they want as a feature. I let my kids have this very expensive phone and part of that deal is so I can use the included feature.

If they were fine with a PanTech piece 'o' crap, I would call or text to see where they are...and if they didn't answer or respond in a decent amount of time, I would worry.

It makes me feel better...it is safer for them....they are kids....

I seriously get where you are coming from, but this is a tool that I (and a bunch of other parents on here) use because it is there and it is helpful...even with other adults in our families. I do not have the time or inclination to constantly spy on anyone whether or not they are in my family...and trying to paint this image of us sitting in a chair at home watching our kids' every move is ridiculous and unfair.

One guy said he used it daily to check up on the whereabouts of his kids, and another person said he didn't start preparing for dinner until he sees his wife leaving the office. They're the ones painting a picture of constant control.

As I said, having FMF activated is one thing - using it on a daily basis simply seems excessive unless you distrust your children.

The thought of activating it on my wife's iPhone hasn't even entered my mind.

----------

Parents force their kids to do stuff they don't want to do all of the time - it's called PARENTING. Otherwise, if kids only did what they wanted to do, anarchy would ensue. They are not old enough to make informed intelligent decisions, and they surely don't fully understand the ramifications of their actions. In that regard, it IS a trust issue. I DO NOT trust my kids to make the best decision all of the time, regardless of how smart, nice, kind and open they are. Therefore, I take actions to either prevent that from happening, or to help minimize the fallout afterwards. Having more information (i.e. knowing where they may be without having to ask them) is only a good thing. I'm sorry if you can't see that. I am over here shaking my head, wondering what your household is like as you obviously never made your kids do anything against their will. My household is NOT a democracy, and the kids surely don't run it. I'm not here to make the popular decisions.

This is my last post on this thread, as obviously we do not see eye to eye, nor are we going to be able to convince each other of the other's position. I bring my life experiences with me when making my parenting decisions, and what goes on in my household doesn't happen in yours. All I can say is that the FmF app is a great tool for parents to use in keeping track of their kids for a variety of reasons and I have value for the app, which was my response to a post near the beginning of this thread.

Not GPS-tracking teenagers on a daily basis is not the same as not imposing any rules, but watching kids like a hawk? Either you live in a far more dangerous community than I do, have far less trust in their ability to make the correct choices, or you simply don't see how controlling you actually are.

But hey, to each their own, I just find it odd that people think the default setting for parents of teens is to distrust them or have the need to check their exact location on a daily basis.

----------

Absolutely agree with every word you said.
I think hafr is a kid, not a parent .....

I think you're very narrow minded to assume only kids would see a problem with smacking a GPS-tracker on teens and use it on a daily basis.
 
I got it from the person who said parents use FMF on a daily basis and that he required his children to have it installed.


So GPS-tracking and phone calls are identical in terms of surveillance in one case, but not the other?

----------



Arguing that tracking your kids with GPS is okay when it's readily available but not when you have to purchase a device specifically made for it is very strange though. So parents with kids who have smartphones are irrational if they don't track their kids on a daily basis, whilst parents with kids who don't can skip it because all the safety arguments and so on somehow wouldn't apply to them?

What's retinal parents? As you've probably guessed, English isn't my mother tongue.

----------



One guy said he used it daily to check up on the whereabouts of his kids, and another person said he didn't start preparing for dinner until he sees his wife leaving the office. They're the ones painting a picture of constant control.

As I said, having FMF activated is one thing - using it on a daily basis simply seems excessive unless you distrust your children.

The thought of activating it on my wife's iPhone hasn't even entered my mind.

----------



Not GPS-tracking teenagers on a daily basis is not the same as not imposing any rules, but watching kids like a hawk? Either you live in a far more dangerous community than I do, have far less trust in their ability to make the correct choices, or you simply don't see how controlling you actually are.

But hey, to each their own, I just find it odd that people think the default setting for parents of teens is to distrust them or have the need to check their exact location on a daily basis.

----------



I think you're very narrow minded to assume only kids would see a problem with smacking a GPS-tracker on teens and use it on a daily basis.
That should have been "rational" (damn autocorrect, as they say).

Ultimately, when it comes to parenting, all that utopian "blind trust" and "good-feely" stuff is just not realistic, no matter what anyone might think. Heck, when it comes to reality of life it's not even realistic. It's good for philosophical discussion purposes, but as soon as you bring the reality of the human condition and the actual world we live in, it just doesn't work.
 
So GPS-tracking and phone calls are identical in terms of surveillance in one case, but not the other

Jesus, do I really have to come in here and explain to you that my child is not a criminal? You actually need that spelled out?

and another person said he didn't start preparing for dinner until he sees his wife leaving the office. They're the ones painting a picture of constant control.

Please spend your week asking friends: "Hey, I know a guy who makes dinner for his wife every night. Is that him controlling her?"

I EAGERLY await your survey results.
 
That should have been "rational" (damn autocorrect, as they say).

Ultimately, when it comes to parenting, all that utopian "blind trust" and "good-feely" stuff is just not realistic, no matter what anyone might think. Heck, when it comes to reality of life it's not even realistic. It's good for philosophical discussion purposes, but as soon as you bring the reality of the human condition and the actual world we live in, it just doesn't work.

In what way has the world changed since tracking apps became readily available, so that not using them daily wouldn't work for rational parents? I see it as irrational fear or excessive need of control, unless (as mentioned earlier) we're talking about a child who has violated the trust - used up his or her trust capital.

----------

Jesus, do I really have to come in here and explain to you that my child is not a criminal? You actually need that spelled out?
Neither the reason nor the subject is in any way relevant to your claim that a phone call and GPS-tracking are identical forms of surveillance.

Please spend your week asking friends: "Hey, I know a guy who makes dinner for his wife every night. Is that him controlling her?"

I EAGERLY await your survey results.
I'll do that. In the meantime, why don't you do the same, using the following question: I know a guy who uses a GPS-tracking device to know when his wife leaves work and where she is at all times, is that him trusting her?
 
No...make it integrated to iOS so I don't have to wait for my friends to download the app. Some may not WANT to download it as they think it takes up space.

Obviously if I want my friends location, I would have to send a request and the friend must accept the request JUST LIKE what the current app does.

Yep, it makes lots of sense to integrate it. It could maybe integrate with the maps app on OSX too.

Interesting how this thread turned into a discussion of whether it's right to track your kids etc. I only use permanent tracking between me and my girlfriend, so if one of us gets home first we can see where the other is and start making dinner etc at the right time. It also came in handy when I had a stupid number of punctures out cycling, ran out of tubes, and needed picking up.

I have also used the temporary sharing with friends occasionally. A few times, people had never heard of the app, and I had to explain that the tracking would only be temporary. Another reason to integrate it.
 
I'll do that. In the meantime, why don't you do the same, using the following question: I know a guy who uses a GPS-tracking device to know when his wife leaves work and where she is at all times, is that him trusting her?

Ok, if you're just going to keep making up crap I didn't say then I'm done here.
 
In what way has the world changed since tracking apps became readily available, so that not using them daily wouldn't work for rational parents? I see it as irrational fear or excessive need of control, unless (as mentioned earlier) we're talking about a child who has violated the trust - used up his or her trust capital.

----------


Neither the reason nor the subject is in any way relevant to your claim that a phone call and GPS-tracking are identical forms of surveillance.


I'll do that. In the meantime, why don't you do the same, using the following question: I know a guy who uses a GPS-tracking device to know when his wife leaves work and where she is at all times, is that him trusting her?
When it's about your kids, you use whatever is at your disposal (usually within reason, but sometimes even beyond that, depending on your particular situation).

What resolves all this for everyone is this: if you don't want to use something like this, then don't, but there's no need to tell others they shouldn't or why they shouldn't (and others don't need to tell you that you should use it). Everything beyond that is pretty much just futal.
 
I suggested this a while ago when Apples own apps were starting to be updated for iOS 7. I think find my iPhone and find my friends should both be in the map app under two aditional tabs at the bottom of the apps screen.

You could even integrate maps with Calendars, can think how to do it but they wouldn't implement it as it would become a visually busy interface which goes against iOS 7's direction.
 
The scariest ideology is one that doesn't recognise itself as ideology.
 
There is an immense difference between asking your kid where (s)he's going, and checking their exact location without their knowledge on a daily basis.


There is an option on "Find my Friends" to hide from followers. If you choose not to hide, then you have given them the permition to track yor EXACT location.
 
I have 3 teenagers. I can track all 3 on FmF if I choose - and they know that.

Do I sit all day long with the FmF app open, watching in real-time where they go. No, not even close. But if I choose to know that my daughter got home safely after a night out with her friends while my wife and I are at a movie (since I can't exactly take a call in a theater), then I'm well within my rights as a parent to do so... and my daughter is aware I can do so.

My kids should (and do) text me when they get to where they're going, so there is also responsibility on their part. But I am relieved as a parent knowing that I could see where they are any time I feel necessary. And to make sure they are calling/texting from where they said they would be.

As Ronald Reagan once said (and it seems like this board has a right-wing bend to it), "trust but verify."
 
Which part did you feel was made up?

In Small White Car's defence, you used a phrase like "knowing where your wife is at all times" when he was talking about wanting to know when his wife left work so he could put the dinner on.

That sounds like one helluva leap you made there.

Find My Friends is very useful for knowing what time your other half is going to be home from work. Traffic jams on the motorway means I can get home anytime between 1745 on a quiet night and 1900 on a busy night. My wife being able to check my location without having to call me every 10 mins has avoided many burnt or missed dinners.
 
I have 3 teenagers. I can track all 3 on FmF if I choose - and they know that.

Do I sit all day long with the FmF app open, watching in real-time where they go. No, not even close. But if I choose to know that my daughter got home safely after a night out with her friends while my wife and I are at a movie (since I can't exactly take a call in a theater), then I'm well within my rights as a parent to do so... and my daughter is aware I can do so.

My kids should (and do) text me when they get to where they're going, so there is also responsibility on their part. But I am relieved as a parent knowing that I could see where they are any time I feel necessary. And to make sure they are calling/texting from where they said they would be.

As Ronald Reagan once said (and it seems like this board has a right-wing bend to it), "trust but verify."
See, this is the way of using FMF that I can understand. What I found weird was the "I check on my kids' exact location on a daily basis because I'm a rational parent"-attitude that was going on...

Right wing bend? Heh, no kidding. Google "authoritarian parenting". It's not typical for any kind of political ideology, but apply it on a society and you have right wing politics. Compare it to "authoritative parenting" (it seems like you would fall under this category) which I feel is a far better option.

In Small White Car's defence, you used a phrase like "knowing where your wife is at all times" when he was talking about wanting to know when his wife left work so he could put the dinner on.

That sounds like one helluva leap you made there.

Find My Friends is very useful for knowing what time your other half is going to be home from work. Traffic jams on the motorway means I can get home anytime between 1745 on a quiet night and 1900 on a busy night. My wife being able to check my location without having to call me every 10 mins has avoided many burnt or missed dinners.
He also said something in the lines of him checking up on her to know where she were when she was out (in the mall, at a friend's house etc.).

I must be extremely old fashioned in that case, because I simply call home (or expect a call if it's the other way around) when I'm running late for whatever reason. Before cell phones, "tardiness" simply meant the dinner needed re-heating. Can't really see how the person being at home having to constantly check FMF to see if the queues have let up is an improvement to that... But hey, to each his own :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.