Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
"Apple representatives attempted to search Hogan's home, but were turned away by a roommate" (MR/Wired) can be interpreted multiple ways, the nicest being that the "attempt" was merely implied, or simply conjecture on the reporter's part.

I think you can be pretty sure Apple representatives, whether dressed in conformance with your nightmares or not, probably are aware of the laws against trespass. That would be tortious, and for no real reason (they could just wait outside until the guy got back).
 
What if no one came looking for that bill? What is the manager gonna do? just keep it?

That's the manager's moral quandry to have.

I don't get to avoid doing the right thing because somebody else down the line might do something corrupt.

You know who thinks like that? People that don't want to do the morally correct thing, and who know it's wrong because they're justifying it.
 
Apple is becoming more evil as they get bigger. Shame really.

What did Apple do here? A piece of their hardware was STOLEN, then SOLD, and now the people that committed the felony are being prosecuted by the law.

Seriously, I can't believe you don't realize that a crime has been committed here. :rolleyes:
 
I think part of the mistake (and a big one at that) on Gizmodo's part here was releasing the videos and photos of the phone while still having possession of it
Oh, certainly. Proof? Engadget posted pictures of the exact same phone before Gizmodo did. It's unclear whether these were sample pictures taken and submitted by Hogan, or if he stopped by and let them photograph it, but either way, Engadget were the ones who broke this story. Engadget were the first to ruin Apple's surprise by showing the phone to the world. Yet after Gizmodo took it one step further and bought/disassembled the phone, all eyes were on them, Engadget's name was completely wiped from memory and Gizmodo somehow retroactively got the entire blame for the whole shebang. Lesson learned: Just take pictures, get off scott free.
 
What if no one came looking for that bill? What is the manager gonna do? just keep it?

Indeed. That's how bribes tend to work. "Oh, no, I wasn't bribing him, you see, I just found this money on the ground, and I thought I'd give it to him for safekeeping... he seemed like the right person to give it to. I mean, someone might have stolen it! And any favours he did for me after were pure coincidence..." Even if you weren't /intending/ to receive a favour, you were opening the opportunity. And the teller has no official (laws in your region may vary) duty to handle lost property on behalf of third parties.

If you find some lost property, you could hand it to the owner, or report to the police. A distant third is to try a lost property department if at some public place, e.g. airport. Anything else is pretty much equivalent in terms of having decided that you're not interested in having the owner get it back.

If you'd identified this phone as almost certainly an Apple prototype, it was absolutely the correct thing to do to contact Apple. Which was done. And if Apple had abandoned the property, because someone speaking on behalf of Apple wasn't aware of what it was, well, sucks to be Apple. Which is what happened. It doesn't matter that Joe Developer had the phone on his person - it wasn't, as far as anyone seemed to believe, actually his property.

So, everyone's out to make a buck, everyone's incompetent, everyone's self-righteous, and everyone's blaming everyone else. And the world's best marketing company is enjoying the world's best marketing. Business as usual.
 
Ignorance to the criminality of an act does not change the definition of the offense.



No, it is up the finder to make adequate attempts to return the property. This guy clearly did not do this. A crime committed by a 21 year old is as much a crime as if it were committed by a 50 year old. 21 is old enough not to be an idiot.



Okay, imagine that you lost a wallet in the bar and I "found" it and then sold your personal information for money. No one should be blamed except you, right? Do I understand you correctly?



It isn't 'just a friggin phone'. It represents trade secrets that are worth millions. And Apple could lose money through lost sales of the current generation models and by competitors getting early access to Apple's design. It is indeed bad, all because someone decided not to follow the law.

I can't believe that, after about 5000 posts over the last few days, people are still bringing up these same clueless arguments. I also can't believe I've read most of them. Must. do. work.
 
Isn't That Obvious?

This guy went to Powell's facebook after he found the phone. And he didn't even try to contact owner directly! Oh, wait, he 'made some effect to return it to apple". Nice make up story to fool around.
 
Apple representatives attempted to search his apartment? Wow. That really seems inappropriate.

A little off topic but since we are talking about breaking the law, you know Mr. Jobs drives around without a license plate on his car. Is he breaking the law or is there some kind of special circumstance that is applied thus overlooking the law.
 
Are you really that inept? What did Apple do here? A piece of their hardware was STOLEN, then SOLD, and now the people that committed the felony are being prosecuted by the law.

Seriously, I can't believe you could be that dumb as to not realize that a crime has been committed here. :rolleyes:
I agree that a crime was committed, I never said anything different. However, since your true fanboi colors are flying, Apple LOST the phone, it wasn't stolen. Having something stolen is different than losing it, please learn the difference.
 
Its a bunch of kids, leave them alone.

If the part about apple representatives trying to gain entry into someone's premises is true, that is total BS!

M$ might have done alot wrong on the past, but they have never stooped this low. Shame on you apple, I hope this is not true.

They aren't kids. They are adults and need to act like it. Apparently they lack a crap load of common sense. Why? Well let's see..

Common sense would tell me if I find something that's not mine, I attempt to find the owner. If I do not, I give it to the police if it warrants it. I DO NOT go and sell it. OBVIOUSLY someone knew what he had was valuable because he was PAID. He knew he had something. It had freaking APPLE on the back. Gizmodo knew he had something.

Common sense states, if someone is going to give you a lot of money for something, what you have obviously is worth something. Hence - DON'T SELL THE DAMN THING especially after you FOUND it and it's NOT YOURS!
 
A little off topic but since we are talking about breaking the law, you know Mr. Jobs drives around without a license plate on his car. Is he breaking the law or is there some kind of special circumstance that is applied thus overlooking the law.

Steve Jobs' car has a license plate. A special one that any resident of California can get.
 
Umm, the phone was LOST, not taken. He didn't wrestle it away from his hands. From a few posts back:


I only blamed Apple for losing the phone, nothing more.

And I haven't made any person attacks on anyone... but you comparing a lost iphone to rape is utterly absurd.

I see dejo already called you out on your lies about personal attacks (thank you, dejo), yet you fail to understand the principle here.

I'm going to try to make this real simple for you.

You leave your phone at a bar. The result of you leaving your phone at a bar is that the phone is at the bar, while you are not.

If you choose to come back and ask around, this phone will still be at the bar.

If it is not there, what has happened? Somebody will have taken it. Somebody will have taken your phone, knowing that it is not their property, and left the bar.

What is it called when someone takes something that is not theirs?

Theft.

Let me know if you need further assistance.
 
Lessons to be learned:

1. Learn to figure out who won't leave important things in a bar.
2. If you find something you think is valuable, do your best to return it without selling it off.

Can we get back to our lives now?
 
I have but one question:

If my iPhone were lost, would the Santa Clara and San Mateo Police Departments and District Attorneys be conducting a similar investigation? What if it had been stolen? What if I had been robbed?

What would it take for me to get the same level of support from these officials? Could I even get the same level of support?
 
I have but one question:

If my iPhone were lost, would the Santa Clara and San Mateo Police Departments and District Attorneys be conducting a similar investigation? What if it had been stolen? What if I had been robbed?

What would it take for me to get the same level of support from these officials? Could I even get the same level of support?

You could if the phone was a prototype corporate trade secret.
 
I have but one question:

If my iPhone were lost, would the Santa Clara and San Mateo Police Departments and District Attorneys be conducting a similar investigation? What if it had been stolen? What if I had been robbed?

What would it take for me to get the same level of support from these officials? Could I even get the same level of support?

If you ran a local business of the size of Apple and the device was a prototype and intellectual property as well as physical, then yeah, probably. This was not just any phone. It's been said.
 
Some say he's naive but not so stupid that he couldn't follow the money. Now he'll turn this into a media windfall. We'll see his punk a** on DWTS.
Geesh!

"Hello this is Mr.Worhol asking 21st century Media Creations to establish a Mr.Brian J. Hogan his requisite 15 minutes. Chow baby!"
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.