First 1.3Ghz Geekbench results

Discussion in 'MacBook' started by dubydoo, Apr 23, 2015.

  1. dubydoo, Apr 23, 2015
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2015

    dubydoo macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2014
    #1
    A Japanese site has posted Geekbench benchmark of the 1.3 version.
    http://netafull.net/macbook/049781.html

    Just when I thought I had decided on waiting for Skylake... :rolleyes:

    Edit: Posted by sucaj on reddit/r/apple

    (It's pointed out that these screens are old news, but after people have started actually receiving and benchmarking their 1.3's it seems the scores are correct)
     
  2. 3bs macrumors 603

    3bs

    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Location:
    Dublin, Ireland
    #2
    So are you're going to wait or not? Are you happy with the results?
     
  3. dubydoo thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2014
    #3
    It's supposedly matching the Macbook Air 2015 i5, which is great! So now I'm leaning towards not waiting!
     
  4. 3bs macrumors 603

    3bs

    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Location:
    Dublin, Ireland
    #4
    11" MBA early 2015 with i7 is getting a max of 3351 and 7015 based on the geekbench scores I could find

    Couldn't find any i5 in 64bit and in your screenshot it says 64bit for the rMB.
     
  5. Atimix macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2015
    #5
    If you're talking about the Russian who posted geekbenches on Twitter that's super old man.
     
  6. dubydoo thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2014
    #6
    http://browser.primatelabs.com/mac-benchmarks
    Macbook Air i5 2016, 64bit single core = 2866

    ----------

    Ah, seems to be a russian tweet. :( Damn
     
  7. MyopicPaideia macrumors 68000

    MyopicPaideia

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Location:
    Trollhättan, Sweden
    #8
    Why does it say @1.2 and @1.3 on the screen shot?
     
  8. noobinator macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
  9. dexterbell macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2015
  10. Atimix macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2015
    #11
    Even if they may be fake, if you compare the increase in performance from the 5y51 to the 5y71, the numbers are almost an exact match.
     
  11. TheSteves macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2015
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    #12
    true: taken from a hungarian "review" video. probably fake.

    But very reasonable:

    5Y31, 2.4GHz turbo, approx. 2400 max single core Geekbench 64
    5Y51, 2.6GHz turbo, approx. 2600 max single core Geekbench 64
    5Y71, 2.9GHz turbo, approx. 2900 max single core Geekbench 64
     
  12. Miltz macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2013
    Location:
    New York
    #13
    It's not fake... If you do the math, the number line up exactly. It's what I was expecting to see from the 1.3GHz chip that boosts to 2.9GHz. Personally I think Apple should have released the 1.2 and 1.3 only, but what do I know.
     
  13. TheSteves macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2015
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    #14
    yes. Thats what I wanted to say- numbers line up- probably not fake!:eek:

    BTW- your photos are truly amazing- you are so gifted!!
     
  14. Miltz macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2013
    Location:
    New York
    #15
    Thank you, I really appreciate that. :D
     
  15. GrantMeThePower macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2011
    #16
    I second that! wow...great pictures and really nice (quick) site! Great stuff, Miltz!
     
  16. Cvx5832 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2014
    #17
    Nice pictures. You clearly have an eye for that thing.

    For what it's worth, I can cruise your site with absolutely no stutter on the 1.2/512 rMB. I can flick it up or down as fast as I can and the thing just glides. So kudos to you and Apple.
     
  17. palmwangja macrumors regular

    palmwangja

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2015
    #18
    indeed. so surreal.
     
  18. JKNorth macrumors member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2010
    #19
    Oh man, just when I thought the art collection in my office was finished...
     
  19. iRun26.2, Apr 23, 2015
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2015

    iRun26.2 macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2010
    #20
    Amazing scenes!

    They are stunning! I can't stop looking at them.
     
  20. dexterbell macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2015
    #21
    It says 1.2GHz and 1.3GHz, that's impossible. They are two different machines. That's also from the people who said they edited photos and videos and played games but they have no video proof of that unit ever working in the video. It's fake.
     
  21. Miltz macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2013
    Location:
    New York
    #22
    That doesn't mean it's fake. Intel doesn't have a official 1.3GHz part so Apple gets binned core m cpus that do 1.3GHz and turbo to 2.9GHz. The software sees it's a 1.2GHz chip based on the CPU code, but it's running at @ 1.3GHz... that's all.

    ----------

    Thank you, Thank you, Thank you.

    ----------

    I'm very happy to hear that... I means a lot. And Yes the rMB is beast for web content.

    ----------

    :D:cool:

    ----------

    Perhaps it's time to add to it... LOL That's a very nice compliment. Thank you.

    ----------

    Hearing stuff like that makes me want to go out and shoot more... Thank you.
     
  22. bcaslis macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    #23
    No, it's not impossible. When I run Geekbench on a 1.2GHz machine, it shows it as 1.1 and 1.2. Must be something about how the Core M reports the status. The fact that it shows 1.2 and 1.3 actually makes me think it's more legit.
     
  23. TheSteves macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2015
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    #24
    Ah... I didn't know that. Thats the part that made it untrustworthy for me- so maybe it is legit. They claimed that they ran all the benchmarks without recording video and when they started to record the video they had the machine bricked (probably tried to connect to itunes and apple bricked the thing)
     
  24. cschaetzle macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2015
    Location:
    Germany/BW
    #25
    The processor is a 1.2 GHz processor but it is takted as 1.3 GHz.

    The Core M is not available with 1.3 GHz.

    The same with the 1.2 GHz model. That is a 1.1 GHz processor witch is takted as a 1.2 GHz one.
     

Share This Page