The prices are not acceptable for you. Apple’s sales figures would seem to indicate that they have enough buyers for their products irrespective of their poorer price/performance ratio in some areas.Me too. I have exclusively used MacOS daily since OS 8. I knew when they announced Mac OS X it was going to be a great OS. I love MacOS (until recently after they sucked out all the open standards). I had a dual roll as network admin for a Windows Server environments. I appreciate both worlds. The problem is we have a bunch of corporate greed trying to suck every dime out of apple now. 7g for a laptop or 10g for a desktop is not acceptable. Enough is enough. The specs they are selling for that amount are not justified when you look at PC equivalents for Price/Performance. No power user cares about Performance/Watt. When you can get a job rendered out faster on a Windows box with the same results for cheaper, that is what matters. More work done equals more money in your pocket. Savings you can use for upgrades that will again be faster than apple offerings in another year. When apple can say we have a machine that outperforms a 14900K with dual 5090's in it for 7g-10g, then I will say, hey.. they are actually competing. Right now, they are not competing. They are playing catch-up. They are about a year behind in CPU and 3-4 years behind in GPU. I would say they have painted themselves in a corner. They are going to hit a point where that SOC is just not feasible to produce for yields because they are jamming too much in. Again, I love MacOS and I love a lot of the features and service apple offers. ... but this last decade is dismal hardware and barely, if any, software offerings from apple for "Pro's". Sorry, but the 2000's were a glorious time for apple. It's changed drastically this last decade. Just my thoughts watching them for the last 30 years. They need to get prices down and simplify the product line again.
Performance/Watt is important in mobile devices, and of course in data centres. It will become more important in desktop systems if power costs continue to rise, but I agree that few people worry about this currently.
The only metric of importance is how well the tools perform for your given tasks, both in absolute performance and in reliability and maintenance overhead. Personally I’ve found Macs and macOS to work somewhat better for me than Linux and Windows machines that I have owned or used. Performance may have been slightly better on some Linux machines, but I sold these after getting newer Apple Silicon machines to replace them, and can’t be bothered with swapping platforms just to squeeze the last bit of performance unless the difference is huge and has financial implications.
for me, I value “lack of hassle” and “it just works” far more highly that raw performance. Macs & macOS are far from perfect, but overall they have required less software and hardware maintenance than other machines I have owned, and that is a big win. Anything that stops me focussing on actual task delivery is just a distraction. I don’t care about price that much.