Works for me. Law enforcement had a warrant signed by a judge.
Don’t like that? Don’t leave evidence of your crimes on your phone.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
First Case Surfaces of Law Enforcement Forcing Suspect to Unlock iPhone With Face ID
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Works for me. Law enforcement had a warrant signed by a judge.
Don’t like that? Don’t leave evidence of your crimes on your phone.
Right, because I specifically said - I support criminals, and child predators..
I was pointing out that privacy seems to be a thing of the past; and the government goes to whatever lengths to get your data (look at the NSA for example).
If anything, we should take a page out of the middle east's book for punishment for child predators.
That's a pretty big "If", because I only see "forced" and/or "told" in the MR article and Forbes article, not "asked".
Can you defeat FaceID by making a weird, distorted facial expression?
I guess it doesn’t matter; they’ll toss you in jail and scan your face while you sleep.
I guess it doesn’t matter; they’ll toss you in jail and scan your face while you sleep.
“We demand cool new technology all the time, otherwise we complain incessantly, and fingerprints are sooo passé!” Thanks us.
Set "Require Attention" in your FaceID settings, then when the thugs try to violate your Constitutional rights simply keep you eyes closed (both need to be closed). It's rather difficult to force someone to open their eyes without being so egregiously intrusive as to make FaceID impossible.
you have no privacy if you're a damn criminal. the world's gotten soft because of ppl like you and that's why there's more crap happening in the world now than ever before.
if you're not committing any crime then there will be no reason to get into your phone. to even write a warrant for such thing takes a lot of grounds. they wanted into his phone to gather more evidence on this pos.
I wonder if the dead person's finger could be warmed up in hot water and then dried off and then try Touch ID.
If you are then a law abiding citizen then why have Face ID? or Touch ID? or passwords? nobodies gonna look at your phone right?
The reason I'd advocate the fake password. If you are in circumstances where that info must be secure. Regardless of the consequences. Plus you are being forced to give that password. Once they try the fake password. The game is over. The device is irrevocably scrambled. Barring future technological development. Any other method and you can be prevented from taking taking that step.
Another option would be for it to perform that wipe. Then open to a protected environment (sort of a guest account like Filevault offers). Then, hopefully, they just think you don't store anything and wipe all your history regularly. While it has already destroyed the encryption key and is resetting the device in the background.
I won't bother delving into the hypotheticals of why one may find this necessary nor how likely anyone would find this necessary. Just suffice to say. One should have the option to implement this. If they decide the benefits outweigh the consequences.
If my first step is followed. Destroying the encryption key. Everything else is not necessary but a nice addition. The encryption key is everything. Without the key everything is a scrambled mess. Biometrics and passwords just unlock the encryption key. By themselves they are useless. What they unlock no longer exists.
As a precaution you want the reboot after. Just in case the key resides in the RAM. Then as long as it remains powered up. Some future security flaw found may be able to retrieve it from RAM.
I hesitate to reply because I think to myself that you are being antagonistic or sillybut...
If you have nothing to hide then you won't mind if the authorities body cavity check you or loved ones, cause you have nothing to hide.
If you want to argue about that, would you mind if you were pulled out of line for the your flight? You wouldn't mind wrongfully missing your flight?
Tell that to the US Customs & Border Protection agents who force random people to unlock their phones (without a warrant) so they can search your phone's contents and/or save a copy of your device's contents when you're leaving or entering the United States (whether you're a citizen of the US or foreign).
- https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/14/business/border-enforcement-airport-phones.html
- https://www.theverge.com/2017/2/15/14629022/border-search-customs-data-privacy-encryption
It's a prevalent enough occurrence that 1Password even made a travel mode, so you can delete your passwords and restore them once through customs, so they won't receive a copy of all of your accounts/passwords if this happens to you.
Yes, people like me that think your life and the things you look at and the phone calls you make belong to you - and a warrant is needed to investivage you is why there is more crime.
Thanks for getting the bottom of that.
I see cops or hear police, search warrant I am squeezing the side buttons and forcing passcode entry. Enjoy not getting anything from me
Face ID is a convenience for the average people that is safe enough for household use. If you don't want cops to unlock your phone, then don't use Face ID. Face ID is not required for operating the phone. Besides, if you're not looking at the phone with your eyes clearly open, the phone is not going to unlock. You can press the power button 5 times before the cops come, but once they are there, that would be considered tampering with evidence.
Biometric ID is not a password. With a search warrant, the only thing you can keep to yourself is your thoughts. Your fingerprint, your face, your iris pattern, your tattoos, your DNA are all fair game for the police to take, it's not considered self-incrimination.
Encryption alone is not 100% secure, unless you can claim plausible deniability. If an adversary suspects that you are using encryption (and they will), they can use other means, such as completely breaking you psychologically, and under pressure you might provide the information that they need, or make a mistake. Investigators can legally apply such pressure.
Biometric ID is not a password. With a search warrant, the only thing you can keep to yourself is your thoughts. Your fingerprint, your face, your iris pattern, your tattoos, your DNA are all fair game for the police to take, it's not considered self-incrimination.
Encryption alone is not 100% secure, unless you can claim plausible deniability. If an adversary suspects that you are using encryption (and they will), they can use other means, such as completely breaking you psychologically, and under pressure you might provide the information that they need, or make a mistake. Investigators can legally apply such pressure.
Yes. Consider that in some countries the illegal action committed by the phone's owner might simply be supporting the government's opposition, fighting for human rights, or wanting democracy.
"Are not complete sentences." is not a complete sentence. I can play this game too!
Biometrics for convenience, alphanumeric password for highest possible security. It will be like that forever.
Check this link: https://security.stackexchange.com/...fingerprint-sensor-versus-a-standard-password <-- very good explanation here.
I am not defending pedophile, good riddance, actually, it is just that this also teaches a lesson all those who want highest possible protection of their data.
Check this link: https://security.stackexchange.com/...fingerprint-sensor-versus-a-standard-password <-- very good explanation here.
I am not defending pedophile, good riddance, actually, it is just that this also teaches a lesson all those who want highest possible protection of their data.
they can check them if they have a warrant, which doesn't just appear out of no where. you need to swear to information on that warrant that has to be accurate.
so again, if you aren't doing anything wrong then you don't need to worry about anything. stop protecting criminals.
[doublepost=1538425283][/doublepost]
you are seriously comparing the two? liberals piss me off. illogical way of thinking and ruining this world.
i can assure you your state of mind would change if your child was involved in a case like this.
I have one too. I just wish Apple Pay would work on it for online and Apple Pay Cash. It's running iOS 12 nicely.
[doublepost=1538429073][/doublepost]
It actually does strobe a light on your face, you just can't consciously see it in the visible realm. I'm surprised people are not having seizures yet or linked them to face id.
Hold another camera up to the front of your X and you'll see it.