Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,733
39,680



Following the release of the first OS X Yosemite 10.10.3 beta to developers this afternoon, the embargo has lifted for media outlets to publish their first impressions and hands-on reviews of the all-new Photos for OS X app. Below is a roundup of some of the more interesting comments and opinions about Photos for OS X, which combines iPhoto and Aperture into one for OS X Yosemite.

Photos-for-OS-X.jpg
The Wall Street Journal describes Photo for OS X as a significant improvement for users in the Apple ecosystem, adding that the app is less confusing to use than iPhoto thanks to an improved iCloud-based approach. It also found Photos for OS X to have snappier performance than iPhoto based on the Apple-provided demo notebook.
"If you choose to turn it on, all of your Apple devices feed all their full-resolution photos into iCloud, making them all available over the Internet to the Photos apps on all your Apple devices. [...] You can see the advantage to all this when you edit photos. With iCloud, any change you make on one device will show up moments later everywhere else."
Wired was also impressed with Photos for OS X, describing the software as a "vast improvement" over iPhoto and praising its new built-in photo editing tools. It believes that, while some professionals might opt for Adobe Lightroom and other tools, Photos for OS X is an ideal photo management and editing solution for most Mac users.
"Advanced users, particularly those operating on 5K iMacs or Mac Pros, may be happier eventually switching to Adobe Lightroom--though most of them probably have done so already. But for most of us, particularly recent Mac converts and people who may not fancy themselves serious photographers, Photos is a welcomely humble way to approach image editing."
icloud_photo_library_large.jpg
Even further praise of Photos for OS X was provided by Re/code, which described the software as a "huge improvement" over iPhoto with easy-to-use editing tools and seamless iCloud syncing. Its hands-on impressions found Photos for OS X to be lacking some advanced editing tools found in Aperture, however, noting that some users might opt for professional software.
"While Photos offers some advanced settings like white balance and level, it lacks some of the professional-level tools found in Aperture. For example, it doesn't have brushable or curve adjustments and doesn't support splitting and merging libraries. And you can't add custom metadata fields in the app."
The Verge went hands on with Photos for OS X and walked away impressed, noting that it handles large photo libraries much better alongside more powerful photo editing, sharing and syncing options. As with other publications, it found Photos for OS X to be more suitable for beginners than professionals.
"iPhoto was never one of Apple's most beloved products. Every year, it seemed slower and less connected to the phone -- the place where most photos are taken. Photos for OS X does a lot of things right, but mostly it's just fast and tightly integrated with your other devices. It feels like a big step forward, even if feels overdue."
Yahoo Tech claims that much of Photos for OS X will be a familiar experience for most Mac users, noting that power users will be impressed with the several photo parameters that can be adjusted. The review finds that Photos for OS X gives up some iPhoto features, however, including flags, star ratings, events, round-trip editing in other apps and sorting albums by keyword, title and rating. Many professional options from Aperture are also missing.
"If you're happy with iPhoto and Aperture now, you should feel no hurry to switch over when Photos comes out this spring (as part of the free Yosemite 10.10.3 update), unless you want that iCloud Photo Library feature. Which would be understandable. [...] Someday, yes, there will be some OS X version that can't run today's iPhoto and Aperture at all. But that's years away. In those years, Apple has plenty of time to bring Photos' feature list up to code, and you can freely keep using iPhoto and/or Aperture and Photos, side-by-side on the same Mac."
Overall, Photos for OS X appears to be a significant improvement for users migrating from iPhoto, but a step down in functionality for those coming from Aperture. A number of other publications have shared first impressions and hands-on reviews, including CNET, Engadget, Macworld, Mashable and SlashGear. Photos for OS X will be available as a public beta soon ahead of a Spring launch as a free update on OS X Yosemite.

Article Link: First Impressions of Photos for OS X: 'Vast Improvement' Over iPhoto
 
Absolutely loving the new Photos situation with Apple devices! The best way to explain it is it's like IMAP for photos.
 
Huh, pretty cool.

iPhoto has always been the most confusing thing about OS X for me. I just don't understand how to properly utilize it, or why it's so clunky. It always seemed so un-Apple to me.

Edit: Evidently iMovie is worse. I've never even tried using it, but I believe you fellow Mac-users.
 
Last edited:
I'm cautiously excited about this. iPhoto has been slow, clunky, and unintuitive for a long time. My wife particularly hates it, but wants an integrated solution, so hopefully Photos will do the trick.
 
What about Faces? I know some folks, including myself, who have put a decent amount of time in getting face tagging to be accurate, and would hate for that feature to go away - especially thinking about facebook integration.
 
Does it still support Face tagging / recognition? I still use that feature in iPhoto just to filter my photos when I am looking for someone in particular.
 
What about Faces? I know some folks, including myself, who have put a decent amount of time in getting face tagging to be accurate, and would hate for that feature to go away - especially thinking about facebook integration.

Faces is still an option in Photos.
 
I see a lot of conversation about "cloud syncing", iCloud, etc. in this post. What about those of us who do not want our photos in the cloud. Will the traditional USB sync/drag and drop/local file storage framework of iPhoto still be allowed? Will it be prominent?
 
iPhoto was unreliable and one of the worst major photo apps, so "vast improvement" over it doesn't say much.

Being locked to iCloud, which is also a very poor cloud service is not a great benefit, either. Does anyone know if iPhoto works with other cloud services?
 
I see a lot of conversation about "cloud syncing", iCloud, etc. in this post. What about those of us who do not want our photos in the cloud. Will the traditional USB sync/drag and drop/local file storage framework of iPhoto still be allowed? Will it be prominent?

I'm sure it will. If it doesn't then.. well it just wouldn't make any sense. I'd be completely shocked if they don't let you sync photos manually.
 
Does it still support Face tagging / recognition? I still use that feature in iPhoto just to filter my photos when I am looking for someone in particular.

I saw it briefly as an organization option in the video posted above. So hopefully that means it will all transfer over seamlessly.

D.
 
Lightroom & CaptureOne kick Apertures butt, so Apple abandons the Pro market completely, ignores even the Prosumer market, and creates an app for teenagers posting selfies on Facebook.

And then charges a subscription fee to use it...

okidoki then.
 
Question/Suggestion: I used to have all users in my household (2 adults, 2 kids) signed into our main iCloud account on all devices. This allowed all pictures taken by the family to be automatically downloaded to our iMac for backup/preservation by Aperture/iPhoto.

When Family Sharing came out with iOS8, we all logged into our seperate iCloud accounts and now only one user has their photos automatically brought into Aperture on our iMac.

They need to have a way to enable Family Sharing in this new Photos app so all the pictures a family of users take are preserved in one place. Of course, I'm sure Apple would like me to buy extra iCloud photo storage for 4 users instead of 1 :)

Any thoughts?
 
Faces is still there.

Unfortunately, you can't edit the drop pin of locations of photos. and you can't see all pictures one map like you could with iPhoto.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.