The reviewer's comment is perfectly fine. He acknowleges that he's responsible of the device breaking, but points out that the device broke very easily. It's to be expected since the iPad is not meant for "rough" usage, but Apple explicitly promoted the iPad for serious mountaneering, hence the "climb every mountan" comment.
As a side note, using the iPad for serious mountaineering is actually not a good idea given the device's characteristics.
If you get the device with the goal of reviewing it, it might be that you are actually requested by your employer to also test its sturdiness, which means handling it roughly or even making "drop tests".
]And RAM. [/B]
Also, I think he was referring to the incredibly thin mockup.
I don't think I will be upgrading from my iPad 4 anytime soon. Currently 50% battery left with 8 hours of use. Mostly YouTube (48%) and Safari (43%). Maybe if I had really bad battery life I would upgrade. The lightness doesn't matter to me, (I throw cases on all my tech.)
90 minutes less battery life than the original iPad Air. It's THINNER though. What a joke!
Not lying.
And iPad sales numbers have already been speaking. Slumped is the magic word.
Again apple, WTF!! we don't want or need thinner or lighter, we NEED battery life though !!
I now use a windows 8.1 atom based tablet that is about 75% heavier than my ipad air was, and its a million times more useful, runs the full office suit, and other windows applications, and the battery still lasts me a full day
sure its not all pretty and aliminum, but its a damn sight more useable than the ipad, oh, and the ability to add extra storage space in the form of an internal microSD or an external USB drive, priceless.
and total cost of this wee device, about 1/3rd that of the ipad air at the moment
"Ridiculously"so battery life not as good then...
well....u gotta compromise somewhere.
Really? nothing to do with the smaller battery?
Again apple, WTF!! we don't want or need thinner or lighter, we NEED battery life though !!
It's not possible to make a serious battery testing without having the device in intense use for one, two weeks at least with several full drains/loads and with different software (music production, video recording/editing, gaming).
We are playing Asphalt (arcade racer video game app) a lot since years on different iPads simultaneously (local WiFi multiplayer). And we always are wondering: If you start playing that demanding (hardware, software) game withlets say: iPad 4 and iPad Air @ 100% batterythe draining is exactly simultaneous as well. After some hours of playing the iPad 4 and iPad Air will show exactly the same 68% battery p.e. It was the same when we played with iPad orig./iPad 2 and iPad 3/iPad 4.
That's true..
The iPad Air is already thin enough...
how light do you want a tablet ? TO the point you can't even feel it.?
I would trade more heavy for battery life any day. Which is why i've still got my 4th gen. iPad.
I agree. It does seem peculiar that they advertised this new feature "thinness" which comes at the expense of battery life. I'd have been impressed if we could have had thinness and the same battery life, but it looks to not be the case..
That protruding camera on the back of the iPhone 6 is a great example. Someone at Apple was so gung-ho about about slimming it down that they made it too thin to fit the lens.
You still get your quoted 10 hours, maybe 11. I have had iPad for years and they normally exactly get 10 hours. Don't know why you guys think the new iPad has less battery life. The a8x is a lot more efficient than a7.
I don't know what some of these reviewes are doing when they are claiming to get 13 hours of battery. Some guy in this thread said he had 8 hours usage and still had 50% left on his iPad 4, that's BS.
On normal usage with brightness at 60% or higher, with third party apps downloaded and running in the background I get 10 hours, so do all my family members or friends that own an iPad. The new ipad air 2 will be the same, exactly as quoted by Apple.
Thank God it's thinner.
Thank
God.
This is the best derp review ever.Joanna Stern, The Wall Street Journal:
Quote:
That anti-reflective screen also makes a great, though admittedly ginormous, viewfinder for snapping nature shots with the revamped 8-megapixel camera. It takes much crisper shots than before, and in many cases, ones as good as those I can take with my iPhone 6. But I won't bring my iPad to some mountain peak, as some Apple promo shots suggest.
Besides, when I set the iPad Air 2 down for a second on a bench, it slid off and hit concrete, shattering the screen. Sure, I'm to blame, but if Apple wants me to climb every mountain armed with nothing but an iPad, ruggedness should be as important as anti-reflectivity.
Heck, I'm still happy with my 2. I've lost track of how many generations behind it is, yet it still does what I need it to do other than constantly reloading safari tabs. And I'm not upgrading just for that.
Weight comes at the expense thickness for more battery life. Everything is a tradeoff, but what good is more battery life if the thing is heavy and uncomfortable to hold for that long? The iPad has incredible battery life as is. Get a second charger if needed.
2GB, and THREE cores? What a pleasant surprise.