Why? Saying you don't think something looks as nice as Apple's previous work is attacking? In my book, constructive criticism on a product's aesthetic is not the same as bashing.Probably need to change your signature.
Mind you, I entered the conversation stating I was sort of amazed that the people saying it didn't look good were getting so much flack. For you convenience I have posted my first input to the thread below:
[Enter guy with obligatory "don't buy one then" remark...] Unfortunately there isn't a 5k Apple monitor for me to endorse so...I am unsure why a person's opinion on how a product looks should be invalidated by what the product does. No, nobody is saying they "can't get work done" on this screen. They'rejust saying it doesn't look as nice as they wanted it to look I don't disagree. I am sure he screen looks absoutely amazing when in use. My prius gets incredible gas malieage too. Doesn't mean it doesn't look like shjit (and yes, we have a prius lol). Call a duck a duck. Physically speaking, this isn't the prettiest design. Period.
The current iMac looks great, FWIW. But the two aren't exactly comparable products. Put them next to each other though and tell me which one is more aesthetically appealing. If it's the LG, fine. If you don't care, fine. If it's the Mac, perhaps you understand my viewpoint. But What's the point of having a discussion on a forum if you can't say how you feel about something?
Last edited: