They should be paying me $10 a month to use a fitbit.
Fitbits sleep tracking is above and beyond any app free or pay wise and the apple watch. Battery life also is double to triple vs my apple watch.
They should be paying me $10 a month to use a fitbit.
I have run across some actual research on this topic and your statements are pretty much dead on. Apple has encouraged me to be a little more active through the gamification of fitness. I've earned the fitness challenge badge every month this year from January through July. When I realized a couple days ago I was behind schedule on earning the August badge, I put more effort and attention into closing my circles over the past few days to make sure I earned the August badge. My personal example is a relatively common use case for these type of devices. By setting small, achievable goals (i.e. a monthly challenge) it encourages people who were already inclined to exercise to do so more often. But for a person who isn't really into exercising, they are still likely to stop as soon as the novelty wears off of their new toy.Is there any research on how much these fitness devices help people to maintain a regular exercise routine?
I feel like most people who don't exercise will be excited with their new toy and start exercising and then abandon it, the way the vast majority of people abandon diets.
I can understand how some of these devices may help people who are already dedicated to exercising but I question the utility of fitness and sleep tracking.
Incoming rant/unpopular opinion:
I see an issue...Look at iCloud. Apple is moving hard to up it's subscription revenue as they're stalling with new hardware. Eight years ago, Apple offered 5GB free. Now, almost a decade later, this hasn't budged. Why? They want perpetually subscription revenue.
Yes, Apple offers 50GB for $0.99/month (super cheap). But this is such a nickle & dime process (just like how they offered 16GB base storage for iPhones until a few years ago). If it's so cheap to offer 50GB for $0.99/month, why not increase standard iCloud to a tiny fraction, say 10GB (they can offset their cost by upping the iPhone price by $15 or whatever Apple pays). This would be better user-experience than the desperate notifications "Your iCloud storage is full. Pretty please upgrade to a subscription so that it will make it harder for you to jump to Andrioid" emails my mom gets weekly.
Fitbits sleep tracking is above and beyond any app free or pay wise and the apple watch. Battery life also is double to triple vs my apple watch.
People who take fitness seriously don't need watches with subscriptions for ****s sake.The subscription you're getting with Fitbit is not comparable to the stuff Apple is offering
Fitbit, like Nike who has Nike Training Club at $15 a month, is offering personalised training and editorial content for those who want to take fitness more seriously
The subscription you're getting with Fitbit is not comparable to the stuff Apple is offering
Fitbit, like Nike who has Nike Training Club at $15 a month, is offering personalised training and editorial content for those who want to take fitness more seriously
Yesterday i found wallpaper app with 7,99 Eur per week subscription.Oh boy, I can’t wait to pay $10 a month to follow personalized fitness advice for a week or two and then consistently ignore it after that!
In all seriousness, I wholeheartedly agree that subscription fatigue is a thing.
Perhaps if there weren’t SO many subscription services out there, this could be a thing. I mean *everything* has a subscription these days. Gaming services, TV streaming services, movie ticket services, food delivery apps, ride sharing apps, grocery delivery services, photo editing apps, clothing curation services, weather apps, Reddit apps, car washes, fitness advice services, etc. etc. etc.
Sure, you don’t *need* to sign up for any of these. But when I look at what I need to prioritize, “fitness advice” falls very low on that list, especially for $10 a month.
Why is EVERYTHING going to a subscription model? What happened to just buying stuff?
I have run across some actual research on this topic and your statements are pretty much dead on. Apple has encouraged me to be a little more active through the gamification of fitness. I've earned the fitness challenge badge every month this year from January through July. When I realized a couple days ago I was behind schedule on earning the August badge, I put more effort and attention into closing my circles over the past few days to make sure I earned the August badge. My personal example is a relatively common use case for these type of devices. By setting small, achievable goals (i.e. a monthly challenge) it encourages people who were already inclined to exercise to do so more often. But for a person who isn't really into exercising, they are still likely to stop as soon as the novelty wears off of their new toy.
please don't give apple any ideasOr I can continue with my Apple Watch and not pay an additional subscription.
Fitbits sleep tracking is above and beyond any app free or pay wise and the apple watch. Battery life also is double to triple vs my apple watch.
Incoming rant/unpopular opinion:
I see an issue...Look at iCloud. Apple is moving hard to up it's subscription revenue as they're stalling with new hardware. Eight years ago, Apple offered 5GB free. Now, almost a decade later, this hasn't budged. Why? They want perpetually subscription revenue.
Yes, Apple offers 50GB for $0.99/month (super cheap). But this is such a nickle & dime process (just like how they offered 16GB base storage for iPhones until a few years ago). If it's so cheap to offer 50GB for $0.99/month, why not increase standard iCloud to a tiny fraction, say 10GB (they can offset their cost by upping the iPhone price by $15 or whatever Apple pays). This would be better user-experience than the desperate notifications "Your iCloud storage is full. Pretty please upgrade to a subscription so that it will make it harder for you to jump to Andrioid" emails my mom gets weekly.
That's ridiculous. The Fitbit is not going to cost you anything per month. Only if you get the subscription service. The watch itself is half the price of an Apple Watch, has many features that are actually useful and has twice the battery life. I don't get why people on this forum are just focusing on the subscription service.I would sooner take a $400 Apple Watch that lasts as long as I can make it rather than a Fitbit that costs $10 a month for life.