Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The quote says they are expecting it in an early update within the next couple of months. I wouldn't get too excited just yet. It might be a long way off. At least that gives them plenty to perfect the implementation.

I just hope that they concentrate on getting Leopard out of the door before moving on to develop the next version of iphone osx... It seems like there is a lot to do in squashing the bugs in the beta, I'd hate to see another delay on Leopard because of iphone.
 
I think Apple was playing a game of chicken with Adobe over the flash player licensing fee. Adobe wants a pretty penny for the player on embedded devices.

[Dramatic reenactment]
ADOBE: So, you want the flash player on your new phone, eh?
STEVE: Yep.
ADOBE: OK, that'll be 5% of retail sales.
STEVE: Ah, no
ADOBE: OK, 2.5%, bottom line.
STEVE: Look, we can release this device without the Flash player at all.
ADOBE: No way, we rule dynamic content on the web--if you want to give people the "real web" you've got to play ball.
STEVE [to the public]: Develop using Web 2.0, Flash Player will suck your battery so it's really better that you don't have FP. [applies RDF effect].
PUBLIC: [Buys 100,000 x ? phones in the first week]
ADOBE: Ah, Steve? Steve? Are you there?
STEVE: Hmm, oh it's you. Can I help you with something?
ADOBE: Ah, how's about 5$/unit.
STEVE [Applying RDF]: you think it would be strategic to offer the Flash Player for free on the iPhone.
ADOBE: Ah... We've decided it would be strategic to offer the player for free on iPhones... [blinks a few times, regains focus] But you've got to pay for the development and maintenance.
STEVE: Already done.

In my 29 years of dealing with Apple, the above is pretty much the way they negotiate-- from a position of strength.

If Adobe caved, then the tipping point was the alacrity with which YouTube agreed to convert to h246.
 
I think Apple was playing a game of chicken with Adobe over the flash player licensing fee. Adobe wants a pretty penny for the player on embedded devices.

[Dramatic reenactment]
ADOBE: So, you want the flash player on your new phone, eh?
STEVE: Yep.
ADOBE: OK, that'll be 5% of retail sales.
STEVE: Ah, no
ADOBE: OK, 2.5%, bottom line.
STEVE: Look, we can release this device without the Flash player at all.
ADOBE: No way, we rule dynamic content on the web--if you want to give people the "real web" you've got to play ball.
STEVE [to the public]: Develop using Web 2.0, Flash Player will suck your battery so it's really better that you don't have FP. [applies RDF effect].
PUBLIC: [Buys 100,000 x ? phones in the first week]
ADOBE: Ah, Steve? Steve? Are you there?
STEVE: Hmm, oh it's you. Can I help you with something?
ADOBE: Ah, how's about 5$/unit.
STEVE [Applying RDF]: you think it would be strategic to offer the Flash Player for free on the iPhone.
ADOBE: Ah... We've decided it would be strategic to offer the player for free on iPhones... [blinks a few times, regains focus] But you've got to pay for the development and maintenance.
STEVE: Already done.

Sounds about right... plus, adding a new feature like flash will be a powerful tool to regenerate iPhone hype after the initial hype starts to die down.
 
I think Apple was playing a game of chicken with Adobe over the flash player licensing fee. Adobe wants a pretty penny for the player on embedded devices.

[Dramatic reenactment]
ADOBE: So, you want the flash player on your new phone, eh?
STEVE: Yep.
ADOBE: OK, that'll be 5% of retail sales.
STEVE: Ah, no
ADOBE: OK, 2.5%, bottom line.
STEVE: Look, we can release this device without the Flash player at all.
ADOBE: No way, we rule dynamic content on the web--if you want to give people the "real web" you've got to play ball.
STEVE [to the public]: Develop using Web 2.0, Flash Player will suck your battery so it's really better that you don't have FP. [applies RDF effect].
PUBLIC: [Buys 100,000 x ? phones in the first week]
ADOBE: Ah, Steve? Steve? Are you there?
STEVE: Hmm, oh it's you. Can I help you with something?
ADOBE: Ah, how's about 5$/unit.
STEVE [Applying RDF]: you think it would be strategic to offer the Flash Player for free on the iPhone.
ADOBE: Ah... We've decided it would be strategic to offer the player for free on iPhones... [blinks a few times, regains focus] But you've got to pay for the development and maintenance.
STEVE: Already done.

this is hilarious i bet they(adobe) are feeling really stupid for not giving it to them for free...
 
Here's some other stuff I would not be surprised/hoping to see..

rstp streaming

native itunes client

Bonjour support

I would really, REALLY like to see an iPod/iPhone version of iTunes that would allow you to buy tracks over WiFi and sync your other iTunes database remotely. In other words, if I download the new Ryan Adams album from an iPhone or WiFi iPod, my iTunes at home should automatically download it on the next launch.

I absolutely love the way Exchange keeps my email synced from Treo to Outlook to OWA, and I could see a lot of interest in having iTunes run the same way.
 
While cool, it seems odd they would suddenly do this. Apple seemed adamant that Flash was a drain on battery life, and they went out of their way to get YouTube to recode all their videos to not be Flash.

So why suddenly add Flash now? Why not have it there all along?
Something doesn't seem right with this rumor -- unless they're just caving in to all the complaints of the iPhone not supporting Flash. But Apple doesn't seem like the kind of company to cave in...

apple was not adamant about no flash. the company line has always been "we're not sure"

specifically here's a direct quote from jobs immediately following the keynote in january:

Markoff: “And what are you thinking about Flash and Java?”

Jobs: “Java’s not worth building in. Nobody uses Java anymore. It’s this big heavyweight ball and chain.”

Markoff: “Flash?”

Jobs: “Well, you might see that.”


http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/01/13/ultimate-iphone-faqs-list-part-2/


there are two obvious reasons for no flash from the beginning:

1) it was a third party app that has its own APIs and interaction methods. apple was eliminating all the "unknowns" for launch. safari, pdf*, quicklook, etc... are all internally controlled

2) because flash has a unique interaction layer, getting it to work properly with the iphone's multitouch display will prove tricky. for example there are no mouseover/mouseout events supported in flash, and i'd say 95% of sites that use flash rely on mouseover/mouseout events.


*pdf is an open standard and apple wrote their own pdf viewer.
 
I would really, REALLY like to see an iPod/iPhone version of iTunes that would allow you to buy tracks over WiFi and sync your other iTunes database remotely. In other words, if I download the new Ryan Adams album from an iPhone or WiFi iPod, my iTunes at home should automatically download it on the next launch.

I absolutely love the way Exchange keeps my email synced from Treo to Outlook to OWA, and I could see a lot of interest in having iTunes run the same way.

unless they are able to make the iphone data transfer over to the computer, which currently on my macbook, i cant, then it aint happenin. Plus, the wireless system could kill your battery life.
 
Well, I still think this is about 2 issues.
1. Ad's not rendering on web pages.
2. Games

And not so much about video, we all know h.264 is high Q.

3. Basic navigation on flash based sites
4. Flash video


Again, without flash a browser isn't a complete browser. Complain all you want about how this is supposedly "not true." Sorry, it is. 98% of *all* users have the flash plugin, and *no* "real" browser would be complete without it. Until flash support comes, the iPhone does *not* display "the real internet" it's still a "kinda-sorta internet."

Before you claim otherwise, think again: Imagine if safari for Macs and Windows did *not* have flash support. Imagine if IE did *not* have flash support. Imagine if Firefox did *not* have flash support. Would you call *any of those browsers* "real browsers? Nope.

w00master
 
3. Basic navigation on flash based sites
4. Flash video


Again, without flash a browser isn't a complete browser. Complain all you want about how this is supposedly "not true." Sorry, it is. 98% of *all* users have the flash plugin, and *no* "real" browser would be complete without it. Until flash support comes, the iPhone does *not* display "the real internet" it's still a "kinda-sorta internet."

Before you claim otherwise, think again: Imagine if safari for Macs and Windows did *not* have flash support. Imagine if IE did *not* have flash support. Imagine if Firefox did *not* have flash support. Would you call *any of those browsers* "real browsers? Nope.

w00master

i call it a real browser. i block all flash in firefox and don't notice a difference on a single site i go to.
 
So these could be some of the reasons flash was not included but will be.

Better battery life and specs for launch.
Adobe wanting steep licensing money.
Less hacks at launch.
Competing products can show flash based web pages.
 
A lot of people aren't realizing that it isn't as simple as using the existing Safari Flash plug-in;
No, I think most people fully understand this, but thanks for underestimating everyone's intelligence anyway.
 
Here's some other stuff I would not be surprised/hoping to see..

rstp streaming

native itunes client

Bonjour support

I'm not expecting RTSP streaming. RTSP requires a lot of back-and-forth between client and server. EDGE (and even 3G) has too long a latency. Possible over WiFi, but I don't see them introducing a feature that would work over WiFi but not over EDGE. I wasn't happy when I learned it was gone (I develop sites that include a lot of RTSP streaming), but once I thought about it, it makes sense that it's gone.

On the iPhone you can jump around quicktime movies anyway, which solves one of the downsides of not having RTSP support. I'll be happy when that feature comes to the Mac...

I'd love native Bonjour, for iChat, printing (nobody's even discussed printing), and who knows what else. Wouldn't it be cool to have skype-like capabilities over WiFi within an office?

Not sure about native iTunes. I do think they'll add the capability to buy songs online.
 
i call it a real browser. i block all flash in firefox and don't notice a difference on a single site i go to.

Sure, from an academic standpoint, it's still a real browser. But you don't notice a single difference with flash blocked? Come on, if you want to give your point of view, let's discard the exaggerations. If you really don't see a difference, then you aren't viewing many sites that are popular among the general population (that means I'm not counting digg, slashdot, etc.). Otherwise, you're ignoring the differences. A grey box with a "missing plugin" icon looks far different than the flash content intended for that space.

Regardless, the average user doesn't care about the academic distinction between the web browser and the plugins - they're two parts of a whole package that most users don't care to separate, and if you were a business that relied on its users noticing and caring about that distinction, you'd soon be out of business.
 
Not Caving, progressing

While cool, it seems odd they would suddenly do this. Apple seemed adamant that Flash was a drain on battery life, and they went out of their way to get YouTube to recode all their videos to not be Flash.

So why suddenly add Flash now? Why not have it there all along?
Something doesn't seem right with this rumor -- unless they're just caving in to all the complaints of the iPhone not supporting Flash. But Apple doesn't seem like the kind of company to cave in...

Rojo, Apple is by no means caving in. There's no logical way in hell that they would not support Flash. It could be that they are working with Adobe to develop some an optimized version that will suite iphone's needs. Just as many have mentioned here, Flash can be intensive on CPU resources and battery life. Through research and development, Apple already knows that 96% of all computers online can view flash content, which means there's no way they can ignoring implementing this sort of feature for the iPhone.

We have a lot to be excited about and to look forward to, think about it; For the first time in history there's been a mobile device released by a company who cares about its product and is in complete control of it's OS. We all can look forward to some killer apps and updates from Apple!
________________________________________________
iPhone, iGotOne, iDidNotWaitInLine! HA HA!
 
Lack of Flash Probably Not Entirely For Technical Reasons

I think Apple was playing a game of chicken with Adobe over the flash player licensing fee. Adobe wants a pretty penny for the player on embedded devices.

I think that's exactly right. Also I heard thru the grapevine that Apple was all ready pissed at Adobe for something and broke off negotiations for the iphone flash plug in.

Has anyone got any idea about java support?
 
If you really don't see a difference, then you aren't viewing many sites that are popular among the general population (that means I'm not counting digg, slashdot, etc.).

I understand that Flash is big on the web, but I'd like to hear some examples of major websites whose core functionality depends on Flash. I'm a user of above-average technical knowledge and I haven't run into a website yet on my iPhone where the lack of Flash was a problem. I'm not saying they're not out there, I'm just asking for some examples.
 
If you want to be using third party apps on the iPhone, you should be rejoicing with this news. As a Flash Developer i can tell you that Flash developers will create the most amazing web apps for your iPhone that will not only match but sometimes exceed the ui experience you see now on the iPHone
 
I think Apple was playing a game of chicken with Adobe over the flash player licensing fee. Adobe wants a pretty penny for the player on embedded devices.

[Dramatic reenactment]
ADOBE: So, you want the flash player on your new phone, eh?
STEVE: Yep.
ADOBE: OK, that'll be 5% of retail sales.
STEVE: Ah, no
ADOBE: OK, 2.5%, bottom line.
STEVE: Look, we can release this device without the Flash player at all.
ADOBE: No way, we rule dynamic content on the web--if you want to give people the "real web" you've got to play ball.
STEVE [to the public]: Develop using Web 2.0, Flash Player will suck your battery so it's really better that you don't have FP. [applies RDF effect].
PUBLIC: [Buys 100,000 x ? phones in the first week]
ADOBE: Ah, Steve? Steve? Are you there?
STEVE: Hmm, oh it's you. Can I help you with something?
ADOBE: Ah, how's about 5$/unit.
STEVE [Applying RDF]: you think it would be strategic to offer the Flash Player for free on the iPhone.
ADOBE: Ah... We've decided it would be strategic to offer the player for free on iPhones... [blinks a few times, regains focus] But you've got to pay for the development and maintenance.
STEVE: Already done.

Hehe.
 
I understand that Flash is big on the web, but I'd like to hear some examples of major websites whose core functionality depends on Flash. I'm a user of above-average technical knowledge and I haven't run into a website yet on my iPhone where the lack of Flash was a problem. I'm not saying they're not out there, I'm just asking for some examples.

I'm not saying major functionality, but I am saying that it is ridiculously unlikely that any user wouldn't notice a difference between using a browser with flash and using one without it.

However, the Volkswagen site seems to be entirely flash-based. It's not a major website necessarily, but it's a very well-known brand and tends to have that same cultish appearance that Apple has (to outsiders).
 
I think Apple was playing a game of chicken with Adobe over the flash player licensing fee. Adobe wants a pretty penny for the player on embedded devices.

I think that's exactly right. Also I heard thru the grapevine that Apple was all ready pissed at Adobe for something and broke off negotiations for the iphone flash plug in.

Hmmm... that's a very interesting angle to look at it.

It's also very "Steve-Jobsian"...

:)

Rod.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.