Hmm? Not sure what this has to do with anything as my edit was made well before this post.
I will stand by what I said. In fact, I imagine you never even heard of the app until you read it allowed for tethering and quickly decided to get it while still up. Call it a hunch lol
I hope you are kidding.
If you are not, you do realize they reserve this right to remotely kill apps in their TOS that
you had agreed to when you use the app store right? That nullifies all your points right off the bat, never mind they were simply grasping at straws in the first place if Apple did indeed do this.
Also ,you would not be out anything for a couple reasons
1) Apple would refund you your money if they killed it
2) There are numerous other apps that accomplish the same function (being a flashlight)
You nor I know what reasons Apple needs to utilize this. I happen to think that having an app misrepresent itself that hurts their business partnership with ATT may be reason enough as well as violating the TOS. We shall see. Kudos if they don't but I wouldn't be surprised
I would hardly call enabling tethering into a flashlight app and then having the developer post a video on how to enable it be called a "mere oversight"
Yes, I agree here
True but tethering has not been approved in the time since Netshare. There is now a way to have that functionality via an approved ATT method.
The case you speak of has since been allowed in the TOS depending on the usage
No longer it does
Not quite. One (streaming) is permitted in the TOS and the other (tethering) is not (other than going through ATT to enable tethering)
To you as well