Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Abandoned in 1995... Fail to pay filing fee. He has no patent. He may have a copyright on his drawings but nothing looks like his drawings. Done.

But here in 'merica you can sue for anything.
 
It looks a lot like a Newton which came out about the same time. Who is stealing from who?

With a clam shell design, dual screens and keyboards, it doesn't look like the Newton (or an iPhone, for that matter).

The closest inspiration might be a 1991 Psion Series 3 Organizer, which was clam shell with a keyboard, but only had one screen.

I will give him that having dual screens was pretty novel (and far fetched) for the time.
 
Why not 100 billion dollars?

blog-banner-dr-evil.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PBJRumors and Zirel
"... but the application was declared abandoned in April 1995 by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office after he failed to pay the required application fees."

End of story. Next.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PBJRumors
It looks a lot like a Newton which came out about the same time. Who is stealing from who?
 
I don't think this will go far... That drawing reminds me of old Palm or Window based PDAs.

This feels like a scam actually. The Apple Newton was released in 1993, so this patent likely was not filed before the Newton began production.

The image itself looks more like later Blackberry models. Even the later Palmpilot which started the PDA craze still had more similarity to the Newton. There's also the Psion devices which date back to calculators.

The first "cellular" PDA-like device was the Blackberry which used Mobitex.

So if this was legitimate, it's sour-grapes.
 
"great and irreparable injury that cannot fully be compensated or measured in money,"

If that's the case, then why ask for 10 billion? Forget the royalties...

And since the patent was never officially filed, how the hell can he sue?
 



Florida resident Thomas S. Ross has filed a lawsuit against Apple this week, claiming that the iPhone, iPad, and iPod infringe upon his 1992 invention of a hand-drawn "Electronic Reading Device" (ERD). The court filing claims the plaintiff was "first to file a device so designed and aggregated," nearly 15 years before the first iPhone.

Apple-vs-Ross.jpg

Between May 23, 1992 and September 10, 1992, Ross designed three hand-drawn technical drawings of the device, primarily consisting of flat rectangular panels with rounded corners that "embodied a fusion of design and function in a way that never existed prior to 1992."Ross applied for a utility patent to protect his invention in November 1992, but the application was declared abandoned in April 1995 by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office after he failed to pay the required application fees. He also filed to copyright his technical drawings with the U.S. Copyright Office in 2014.

Apple-vs-Ross-design-drawing.jpg

While the plaintiff claims that he continues to experience "great and irreparable injury that cannot fully be compensated or measured in money," he has demanded a jury trial and is seeking restitution no less than $10 billion and a royalty of up to 1.5% on Apple's worldwide sales of infringing devices.

Ross v. Apple, Inc. was filed with the Florida Southern District Court on June 27. The case number is 0:2016cv61471.

Article Link: Florida Man Sues Apple for $10+ Billion, Says iOS Devices Copy His 1992 Drawings

Kind of ridiculous. It's like using a generic picture of ugly car with the words "self-driving" next to it and suing the bigger player in 15 years time.
 
You go, Ross! :confused:
[doublepost=1467169123][/doublepost]Let me guess, old Ross tried to sue Palm first before realizing HP had ditched the brand by selling it off to the Chinese?
 

Attachments

  • 220px-Palmpilot5000_eu.png
    220px-Palmpilot5000_eu.png
    99.9 KB · Views: 96
in 1997 I made a drawing placing a mobile phone on a wrist (Glove) – now that called "Smart watch" : D

where can I get my millions from ; )
 
It is interesting people are pointing to tablets in Star trek and movies as prior art, but are totally ok with Apple suing Samsung.
 
This is the problem with the patent system, although it sounds like he doesn't even have a patent. If you have an idea, you should have to build a prototype or manufacture it within in a given amount of time. Saying you have an idea and not executing on it over a certain period of time is just like millions of others who drew a sketch of their idea...

The patent system worked perfectly here. He applied, he didn't follow through, the application was voided.

Patents are already "Use it or lose it." Patents intentionally expire in a relatively short period of time - in the US that's 20 years for "utility" patents, 15 years for design patents, from the date of the original application, regardless of whether the thing is manufactured, or not. After that, the idea becomes public property. Reduce the possibility of profiting from the idea, and society ensures that more ideas will remain locked inside people's brains, desk drawers, or bank vaults - society never gets to own them, or use them.

The bigger an idea is, the harder it is to bring to fruition. Sure, someone can invent a gadget that can be prototyped in a day and manufactured within months. Most of the time, gadgets of that sort do not change the world. Big inventions, the ones that change the world, generally take far more time, money, and effort. A shorter patent time clock can put the really big ideas out of society's reach.
 



Florida resident Thomas S. Ross has filed a lawsuit against Apple this week, claiming that the iPhone, iPad, and iPod infringe upon his 1992 invention of a hand-drawn "Electronic Reading Device" (ERD). The court filing claims the plaintiff was "first to file a device so designed and aggregated," nearly 15 years before the first iPhone.

Apple-vs-Ross.jpg

Between May 23, 1992 and September 10, 1992, Ross designed three hand-drawn technical drawings of the device, primarily consisting of flat rectangular panels with rounded corners that "embodied a fusion of design and function in a way that never existed prior to 1992."Ross applied for a utility patent to protect his invention in November 1992, but the application was declared abandoned in April 1995 by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office after he failed to pay the required application fees. He also filed to copyright his technical drawings with the U.S. Copyright Office in 2014.

Apple-vs-Ross-design-drawing.jpg

While the plaintiff claims that he continues to experience "great and irreparable injury that cannot fully be compensated or measured in money," he has demanded a jury trial and is seeking restitution no less than $10 billion and a royalty of up to 1.5% on Apple's worldwide sales of infringing devices.

Ross v. Apple, Inc. was filed with the Florida Southern District Court on June 27. The case number is 0:2016cv61471.

Article Link: Florida Man Sues Apple for $10+ Billion, Says iOS Devices Copy His 1992 Drawings
[doublepost=1467189080][/doublepost]Something is very fishy about Ross' drawings that tells me that he is a fraud! He specifies the "black and white or color LCD screens" on his 1992 invention are "LED backlit", a technology that was not even on anyone's horizon in 1992! In fact, in 1992, LEDs were essentially any color you wanted, if they were red or green. The white LED was not even developed until 1995, and the lumen out put was far too low to even be considered for a backlight. The first use of LEDs as an LCD screen backlight was not developed until 2003, and commercially in 2004! Yet Ross claims his device in 1992 omnisciently and confidently claims that LCD screens are LED backlit!How?

Easy, the drawing had to have been done sometime these past few years since these technologies were developed. . . this guy is a fraud and his claims are frauds.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.