Yeah sometimes looking too closely is not really sensible...Folks, don't fall for the tutti-frutti, phoney-baloney, plastic banana, good time, rock-n-roll Apple PR "leaks," designed to build hype. The design has been finalized and locked-in for at least a year. There are always unique issues that appear when manufacturing at scale. Apple likes to spin these into "pushing the cutting edge" to astroturf hype. This is nothing more than working-through typical manufacturing adjustments.
Sure, don't bother going to the moon or Mars. Don't bother trying to make batteries more efficient. Don't bother working on building homes with 3d printers. Don't bother making the phones we have faster while still controlling heat. We shouldn't bother doing any new tech. Got it.
TouchID? Oh my, I might have to get this.. been waiting for the return of TouchID, I don't like lasers hitting my eyes 1000 times a day
It is a laser.It's not a laser...
LOL, yeah every source is wrong, YOU are the one who has the facts lol. Its coming out this year, deal with it.I don’t think Apple will release a foldable anytime soon. For the same reason they haven’t released one in the past 10 years while all the other big smartphone manufacturers have. This.
I mean...The hinge is always going to be the Achilles heel of a foldable device.
The iPhone is know to have this issue.
This is not how iOS and iPadOS apps work at all.NoThe apps would have to rewritten to take that into account. An iOS app and its sibling iPadOS app don't expect to be running on the same device with the same data. (When running on different devices, they use iCloud or other services to sync their local state at certain points, but they each have their own separate local state.) The iPadOS app would have to be able to restore its state from the saved state of the iOS version, and vice versa. In the general case, these are really like two distinct apps. You can't expect them to turn into each other just because the user unfolded or folded the phone. They also have to be separate instances because iOS and iPadOS do not provide identical APIs. The runtime environment under iOS and iPadOS behaves differently. While you can run an iOS-only app under iPadOS, that app thinks that it's runing under iOS (being iOS-only, there's nothing else that it would be capable of running under). An app instance is either iOS or iPadOS, it can't be both.
First two generations of a new Apple product is always that. Reason being that by the time the first gen product hits the market, the second gen is almost finalized with very little consumer feedback making it into the device.The hinge will be released with the flaws. New buyers are BETA testers.
You're opinion that a folding phone isn't useful, is most certainly your personal opinion. It has no basis in fact, but still, you're entitled to your opinion. I own a Fold 7 and find it very useful to the point that I will probably never buy a slab phone again. Also, Jobs shunned many changes to products the Apple has since implemented and done very well with.All those things are inherently useful, this isn't.
Jobs wouldn't, just like he shunned lots of other trends that were useless. Ever since OLED tech first came out in the 2010s and by mere nature of how it worked, it's flexible and rollable - companies have been trying to find a way to shove that into a product - none have worked. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
Yeap, that’s was really impressiveThey should import some OPPO Find N6 and reverse engineer to see how it's done!
Let me show you something )I really don't think any company can build a smartphone foldable at the standards that are hoped for. Apple is no different.
Hinge-gate = do not buy