Originally posted by TimDaddy
Even though I am pretty anti-union, I feel the need to defend the union on this one. They are NOT on strike. There has been an ongoing labor dispute for I believe over a year. The company that runs the docks are adding a computerized inventory management system. This will result in many new jobs. Instead of making these jobs available for union members to transfer into, the company wants to fill them with new, non-union, lower paid employees. Basically, they are adding jobs but the jobs are off limits to current employees. The company is accusing the union of illegally, intentionally slowing down work. Their claims have not been proven, so I don't know who is telling the truth there. But, the fact is, the COMPANY chose to lock out all of the employees. The employees did NOT authorize a strike. But, I'm sure the Bush administration will make it look like the union is the party that doesn't care about their damage to the American economy, even though the work stoppage was directly caused by the company. I'm not a popular guy at my job right now. Most of us are anti-union and Bush supporters. I am too most of the time, but I must dissent right now. I haven't had a minute of overtime all week because our company is afraid of running out of parts. They say if the dispute goes on for a few more days we WILL shut down completely. Another of our company's plants, located in California, was forced to send its workers home on Thursday with no word on when production will resume. All my cowokers are saying that the union is taking food out of their children's mouths. I say the company that runs the docks is doing that. Has anyone else here been effected by the Longshoremen's dispute?