Is it just me, or does this guy bear an amazing resemblance to Steve Ballmer?
If I could only achieve a 14% margin, I wouldn't be lecturing others how to do things better.
Apple will figure this out. Or it will figure out a way to make it irrelevant.
Apparently Apple's attempt to get into the television market fell apart because the providers of content already had contracts with the likes of Comcast to prevent a newcomer like Apple from revamping the television.
Apple didn't need to crack the entire phone market when it came up with the iPhone. It signed exclusive deals with certain carriers.
It could try a similar tactic with an Apple Car. If their car is both electric and automatically driven, they could partner with someone like Disney to ferry families from the various hotels to the parks (along private roads). The journey could feature "random" bicyclists and pedestrians (actually Disney cast members). For a lot of people, this would be their first experience with autonomous cars. For Apple, it would be a showcase of its driverless car tech. For Disney, it would be an attraction in itself, both for the passengers and for, say, other guests dining in a restaurant overlooking a "busy intersection".
awfully premature since you dont even know what they're making.
also do i sense a small tinge of jealousy since maybe because Apple is using Mopar instead of GM on their test vehicles?
Honestly, Apple doesn't have to know anything about constructing vehicles. They will hire the best to do it for them and grow into that market.
Also, the car frames are only made of steel. The rest is cheap fiberglass and plastic, basically. I'm pretty sure apple could beat every company down for giving us a unibody steel vehicle. One that looks great and is great for your safety.
I'm ready for Apple to be on top completely. Technology will be integrated into everything we have/do because it makes life better. Period. This is bound to happen.
Apple bought a couple thousand furnaces and was in the sapphire business. Try that with auto manufacturing. You are correct, the auto business is a long game that takes a lot of money with a small return.
Pretty sure that any and all companies out there can duplicate what Qualcomm is doing - but only Qualcomm has the patents, and why would you waste your time developing your own when it's easily licensable and already works with existing infrastructure?
No inside source.Sounds like you have an inside source. I doubt they're building a car at all, but they could hypothetically start with a hybrid to get the ball rolling. That eliminates issues with range and lack of plentiful charging stations. So ICE technology would not be out of the question near term. Everyone seems to assume an EV but it could just as easily be a hybrid that leads to an EV.
The average profit for high end makers are around 10-13%. Not a huge net profit, but considering the revenues involved, still many billions.
The average profit for high end makers are around 10-13% (Audi for example is around 12%). Not a huge net profit, but considering the revenues involved, still many billions.
Buying the furnace wasn't the end of the equation and those furnaces were seemingly much more temperamental than expected (GTAT was sued by someone who bought them). There were also new Intellectual property used in processing the Boules themselves.
Anyway, notice I didn't dismiss the difficulties of doing a car at all; quality issues are what bring down most car makers. There isn't any wiggle room there and getting Apple hardware quality right from the start would be a big challenge. Producing crap is no challenge obviously ;-).
Apple doesn't want a bad Car to affect their overall brand; which is probably the main reason why they'd want to stay out of it.
As of now we have no idea what Apple is planning on doing. What I do know is that Apple really liked that iOS Car Toy, Anki. Those cars have a level of Autonomous that Apple probably is thinking why not bring to real cars.
Forget steel. We taking Aluminum, Carbon Fiber, Gorilla Glass or any other monkey related Glass. Apple will show you how to make cars. GM motors have no idea what will hit them.
Is it just me, or does this guy bear an amazing resemblance to Steve Ballmer?
they also didnt have an idea regarding the hifi market and now the overwhelming majority of homes all have an ipod hifi.
wait i dreamt that.
So what makes the Ex-GM CEO think that Apple will sell the car with only <20% margins?
Seriously, how shortsighted is that guy?
Just because GM couldn't ask higher prices (because they don't know how to build good cars), why should or does Apple have to do the same?
This guy doesn't make any sense.