Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is it just me, or does this guy bear an amazing resemblance to Steve Ballmer?

If I could only achieve a 14% margin, I wouldn't be lecturing others how to do things better.

He doesn't get to export all his labor to China, automakers pay high Union wages. It's cute to look at Tesla, but they burned thru several billions before having a working car at all. There's not a "Foxconn" for cars where you just show up with a pretty picture and they make it... Even GM doesn't have those. The demands placed on cars are much higher. It can't have "bugs" like not turning left, or a lazy headlight... Look how hard Totota fought to keep the Feds from looking at their speed controller (it's SOP that the Feds look at whatever they want for safety) Feds are "up in your business" in the auto market at nearly every step of the process... Apple would be better off adding FDA Approved features to their watch.
 
Apple will figure this out. Or it will figure out a way to make it irrelevant.

Apparently Apple's attempt to get into the television market fell apart because the providers of content already had contracts with the likes of Comcast to prevent a newcomer like Apple from revamping the television.

Apple didn't need to crack the entire phone market when it came up with the iPhone. It signed exclusive deals with certain carriers.

It could try a similar tactic with an Apple Car. If their car is both electric and automatically driven, they could partner with someone like Disney to ferry families from the various hotels to the parks (along private roads). The journey could feature "random" bicyclists and pedestrians (actually Disney cast members). For a lot of people, this would be their first experience with autonomous cars. For Apple, it would be a showcase of its driverless car tech. For Disney, it would be an attraction in itself, both for the passengers and for, say, other guests dining in a restaurant overlooking a "busy intersection".

I trust Apple to be able to figure it out, or at least figure out if it's even worth it. I was more referring to the people who say that because Apple figured out how to make a mobile phone, which is basically a small computer these days, that must mean they could just as easily figure out how to build a better car. I'm not saying they couldn't do it, just that iPhones and cars are like apples and oranges. Apple pun not intended.
 
awfully premature since you dont even know what they're making.

also do i sense a small tinge of jealousy since maybe because Apple is using Mopar instead of GM on their test vehicles?

Re-read the comment. He's not disparaging the idea. He's saying make sure you want to do it because it ain't like selling smartphones.

Using Mopar to reference a minivan.:mad: That's sacriledge man. If it ain't muscle, it ain't Mopar.
 
Honestly, Apple doesn't have to know anything about constructing vehicles. They will hire the best to do it for them and grow into that market.

Also, the car frames are only made of steel. The rest is cheap fiberglass and plastic, basically. I'm pretty sure apple could beat every company down for giving us a unibody steel vehicle. One that looks great and is great for your safety.

I'm ready for Apple to be on top completely. Technology will be integrated into everything we have/do because it makes life better. Period. This is bound to happen.

I'm not sure what cars you've been in that only have frames made of steel and the rest is cheap plastic and fiberglass!

And I don't think Apple is going to mill an entire car out of one giant lump of aluminium...
 
Apple bought a couple thousand furnaces and was in the sapphire business. Try that with auto manufacturing. You are correct, the auto business is a long game that takes a lot of money with a small return.

The average profit for high end makers are around 10-13% (Audi for example is around 12%). Not a huge net profit, but considering the revenues involved, still many billions.

Buying the furnace wasn't the end of the equation and those furnaces were seemingly much more temperamental than expected (GTAT was sued by someone who bought them). There were also new Intellectual property used in processing the Boules themselves.

Anyway, notice I didn't dismiss the difficulties of doing a car at all; quality issues are what bring down most car makers. There isn't any wiggle room there and getting Apple hardware quality right from the start would be a big challenge. Producing crap is no challenge obviously ;-).

Apple doesn't want a bad Car to affect their overall brand; which is probably the main reason why they'd want to stay out of it.
 
Apple Car(t).....the ultimate mobile device.
Can't wait to pay 50k for a car that goes obsolete in 4 years.
And do you really want a self driving car that can get hacked...and leave you unable to even control it.
 
Pretty sure that any and all companies out there can duplicate what Qualcomm is doing - but only Qualcomm has the patents, and why would you waste your time developing your own when it's easily licensable and already works with existing infrastructure?

Its not that small a task, there is a reason that there was alot of consolidation in the telecoms market in the early 00's . Thers is no reason for :apple: to develop there own modem technology, but that not what the thread is about. Could Apple create an all new technology?
 
Sounds like you have an inside source. I doubt they're building a car at all, but they could hypothetically start with a hybrid to get the ball rolling. That eliminates issues with range and lack of plentiful charging stations. So ICE technology would not be out of the question near term. Everyone seems to assume an EV but it could just as easily be a hybrid that leads to an EV.
No inside source.

A hybrid would be a a good starting point if they had started five years ago, because they could be coming to market in the next year or so and the infrastructure is not ready. But there are more charging stations now than there were a year ago, and there will be more next year, and the year after that.

I don't know if Apple is going to build a car. It's conceivable that they are exploring the idea. If they do bring a car to market, I'd be willing to bet they aren't going to offer a CD player as an option, or a ICE hybrid engine.

I could see a fuel cell electric / plug-in electric hybrid, though.
 
Seems like every CEO who doubts the abilities of Apple, end up eating crow.
Michael Dell, Steve Balmer and now this guy.
 
To be fair, a smartphone is just a small computer which is very much in the same realm of what Apple has always made. A car really is a very different beast. I seriously doubt apple is making a car but if they are I'm sure it will be electric and very, very different from the old and outdated model GM uses to design and manufacture their cars.

Again, I seriously doubt Apple is actually intending on making and selling an automobile for consumers. Maybe they are making their own self driving cars for the Apple campus, that I could believe.
 
The average profit for high end makers are around 10-13%. Not a huge net profit, but considering the revenues involved, still many billions.

Thing is, for Apple to play in this market, let alone become competitive, they'll have to spend tens of billions before they'll make even a single red cent. Even if they only want to be a little boutique company, like Tesla, it'll cost them a goodly chunk.

They have the money to try, certainly. The question is, will be able to get back their investment in 10-20 years? How long will it be before Apple is a growth stock again? Will they ever be a growth stock after this?
 
The average profit for high end makers are around 10-13% (Audi for example is around 12%). Not a huge net profit, but considering the revenues involved, still many billions.

Buying the furnace wasn't the end of the equation and those furnaces were seemingly much more temperamental than expected (GTAT was sued by someone who bought them). There were also new Intellectual property used in processing the Boules themselves.

Anyway, notice I didn't dismiss the difficulties of doing a car at all; quality issues are what bring down most car makers. There isn't any wiggle room there and getting Apple hardware quality right from the start would be a big challenge. Producing crap is no challenge obviously ;-).

Apple doesn't want a bad Car to affect their overall brand; which is probably the main reason why they'd want to stay out of it.

What Apple thought they were buying was GT's technology on making the type of sapphire that they wanted. The furnaces were the hardware to do so. Somewhere things didn't go anywhere near the way they were planned.
 
As of now we have no idea what Apple is planning on doing. What I do know is that Apple really liked that iOS Car Toy, Anki. Those cars have a level of Autonomous that Apple probably is thinking why not bring to real cars.
 
As of now we have no idea what Apple is planning on doing. What I do know is that Apple really liked that iOS Car Toy, Anki. Those cars have a level of Autonomous that Apple probably is thinking why not bring to real cars.

This is very true, we have had endless Apple television set rumours on this site for several years now... and we still have no Apple television set. So who knows?
 
I wonder how much it would cost to make a car if you got rid of the unions - i'm not saying create sweat shops but make the industry like every other non-union industry in the U.S. How much overhead do unions add?
 
Forget steel. We taking Aluminum, Carbon Fiber, Gorilla Glass or any other monkey related Glass. Apple will show you how to make cars. GM motors have no idea what will hit them.

Yeah... I'm so tired of cars that dent. I can't wait for that erra to end. Looking forward to the days when cars just shatter to pieces and both drivers find themselves just sitting on the ground surrounded by tiny shards of glass.

Saturn thought dent resistant panels were a great idea. Until cars were driving around with huge holes where a small dent might have been.

Ford is on the right path with strong aluminum. No rust, still rigid.

Fiberglass, glass, carbon fiber, and plastics have already proven to be poor structural choices.

But it would still be funny to watch a car essentially disintegrate on impact. So hopefully Apple will go that route. We need the comic relief.

And, on the plus side, Apple getting into the car business will start a whole new market of car covers and car skins for increasing strength and protection from impacts.

Maybe someone will even make a waterproof case for when Apple Maps tries to turn your car into a boat.
 
What is it with all the absolutes when it comes to this rumor? Either this GM guy is a doughbag or no way Apple is building a car. I think what he said is completly reasonable. But at the same time I wouldn't be surprised if Apple is looking at what role they can play in the car space. Last year Tim Cook said iPhone would be Apple's main revenue driver for the next 5 years. What comes after iPhone. It would be ridiculous to think Apple isn't thinking about what's next. Doesn't mean an :apple:Car is coming but also doesn't mean Apple isn't researching this space.
 
I don't think you need to have all the experience in house. Apple partnered with the company in Arizona to make Sapphire glass that backfired. The phones are built by other companies in China.

Apple doesn't make a lot of the parts in their devices, if any. Car manufacturers often build cars in factories and production lines ran by another company they have a close relationship with that the general public has never heard of. Parts for a single car can sometimes come from dozens if not hundreds of companies around the world.

I think an Apple car is a somewhat odd idea and I don't know how possible it is. Nevertheless, I don't think you can say Apple's people don't know how to do it. They don't need to be the experts working with steel, if an Apple car (electric) would even use steel.
 
they also didnt have an idea regarding the hifi market and now the overwhelming majority of homes all have an ipod hifi.

wait i dreamt that.

True but my point is they can do it if they do it right. True not always.
 
I still don't see Apple getting into the car business unless they buy Tesla. Start from scratch on a completely new industry sounds crazy IMO but I could see them buying Tesla and using their already established know how.
Apple and Tesla together could indeed be something very interesting and cool.
 
So what makes the Ex-GM CEO think that Apple will sell the car with only <20% margins?

Seriously, how shortsighted is that guy?

Just because GM couldn't ask higher prices (because they don't know how to build good cars), why should or does Apple have to do the same?

This guy doesn't make any sense.

Tesla reinvented the car and has 30% margins which is higher than most in the auto industry. I doubt Apple could get more than that which would still be LESS than the 40% they get today selling phones. Moving into cars would be dilutive to Apple.
 
Apple didn't know anything about music before they entered into the music industry.

Apple didn't know anything about phones before they entered into the phone industry.

Two huge industries. Revolutionized by one company.

Winter is coming, GM.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.