Would have been nice if they'd taken the opportunity to drop the price, seeing as it's no longer going to be required for accessing Apple's services.
What does one have to do with the other?
Would have been nice if they'd taken the opportunity to drop the price, seeing as it's no longer going to be required for accessing Apple's services.
I actually really do love my Apple TV 4K.
It runs YouTubeTV wonderfully!
Most bold, courageous and innovative move we've seen today.
The name change is appropriate given the capabilities but I think the business move Apple should have made as an armchair quarter back would be to show investors they truly give a crap about growing services revenue would be to:
Make the 1080P Box $49, 4K Box, $99 for anyone who signs up for AppleTV+ for one year and maybe they will do this but if AppleTV the box is a hobby and the service is what they want to boast to investors, they need to move more units.
Well, with new TVs supporting AirPlay 2 and the AppleTV app right out of the box, there will be less incentive to buy one.What does one have to do with the other?
I can't believe they're still charging $150 for a non-4K ATV, that's absurd.
It would be nice if they updated the hardware, the chip is already 4.5 years old.
Can't compete with the better and more versatile $50 Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K that has been on sale for as low as $35. This is the current industry benchmark and I've had HTPC, Nvidia Shield TV, Apple TV, Android TV, SBCs, etc.
I returned mine when I realized that Apple is not going to invest in new hardware and instead will make an app that most TV manufacturers will just put in their Smart TV OS. They listed quite a few that are on board with this. I recall somebody here saying that would never happen.
That's the Apple way. They still sell a 5 year old Mac Pro starting at $3,000.
I’ve been cautious with anything Apple since 2012 because you know that you’re paying at least 33% Appletax with lock-in.
Gone are the days you happily bought Apple stuff for knowing they bring you a good experience and worth the price. It’s definitely gone
Limited to 1080p YouTube on Apple TV 4K since Apple doesn't think VP9 is good for you.
It runs YouTubeTV wonderfully
Pretty sure everything Apple sells is new in the box.
Whew. (That's the sound of ATV4 users breathing a sigh of relief; the rebrand means ongoing support for a while longer. Those who got them free from DTV Now probably exhaled twice from extra joy.)
YT 4K video on ATV is a casualty in the VP9/HEVC turf battle.
I have a 4th Gen ATV. Evidently I haven't been using it correctly because I still like mine. I also have a Roku, but I had timing problems with speech and video and I've quit using it.
I am not a heavy tv watcher, I don't subscribe to any premium channels on my Dish, so I'm probably not a good standard to judge the ease, quality or value of anyone's service. My ATV has done what little I've asked of it with few problems and I'm not unhappy. Too little 4K is reliably available to me, OTA doesn't have any 4k and internet is too flakey to support it at my house, evidently. Someday I might get a 4k TV, but probably not this year. I have no choice in my ISP-other than options that are worse than what I currently have- and I see no reason to spend money on something I may be able to use only a handful of times in the next 2 years because of where I live. So no 4k TV and no 4k streaming device until I can actually use it on a daily basis.
It's all 720p/1080p content anyhow
Since when has the 4th gen version come with the newer remote. My Apple TV HD’s remote doesn’t have the white ring around the menu button.
It's all 720p/1080p content anyhow
these should come free with the service like a cable box)
Does the 4K still not support YouTube 4K?
Since when has the 4th gen version come with the newer remote. My Apple TV HD’s remote doesn’t have the white ring around the menu button.
Since now. It's part of the rebranding. This picture is directly off the new Apple product page.
P.S. You don't have an Apple TV HD unless you bought it like 5 minutes ago.
Since they released the ATV 4K back in 2017.
[doublepost=1553554178][/doublepost]
Nonsense. I can view 8K60p content on my LG OLED and it looks glorious. Youtube also has HDR10 videos. If you haven't seen this stuff yet, I highly suggest you get a new TV this year. 4K HDR is the new standard going forward and it's ready for primetime.
There are a lot of 4K and even 8K content on YouTube. Just limited to 1080p on Apple TV 4K without VP9 codec support.
Tim wears a new pair of sneakers every day. These don't pay for themselves.
From what I’ve read, it’s better suited to extend Homekit than e.g. an iPad, due to better BT range. Still on the fence, but currently that’d be the only reason for me to get an AppleTV (4K). For everything else I use other platforms or my AppleTV 3rd gen.Apple TV is now "unofficially" a dead platform since it now longer will have anything unique to offer (access to Apple's ecosystem).
First of all, I've bought well over $50K in Apple gear over the years, and last year I dropped $2500 on an OLED tv. I can afford it (and I have an ATV 4K). It doesn't make it any less absurd.I can't believe people are decrying prices as absurd when it's clear that there is more than ample demand to justify the pricing. That you can't afford something doesn't make it absurd.